★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head><hi rend='superscript'>RS</hi> VOLUMINOUSNESS - STYLE. <hi rend='superscript'>7</hi></head> | <head><hi rend='superscript'>RS</hi> VOLUMINOUSNESS - STYLE. <hi rend='superscript'>7</hi></head> | ||
<!-- The following 2 paragraphs are scored out --><p><del>thought in there taken to | <!-- The following 2 paragraphs are scored out --><p><del>thought in there taken to prevent. — Scarce a Statute but is loaded <add><unclear>laden</unclear></add> with one or <unclear>more</unclear><lb/> | ||
<unclear>instances</unclear> of | <unclear>instances</unclear> of this sort</del></p> | ||
<head>42. - v. 35. <del><gap/> <gap/ | <head>42. - v. 35. <del><gap/> <gap/> <unclear>frequenting</unclear></del></head> | ||
[Not that [this violation of the Rules of Grammar] is <add>in</add> any case peculiar to this Statute,<lb/> | <p>[Not that [this violation of the Rules of Grammar] is <add>in</add> any case peculiar to this Statute,<lb/> | ||
for in <del>a</del> <add>few</add> printed compositions of the age, are grammatical trespasses more frequent<lb/> | for in <del>a</del> <add>few</add> printed compositions of the age, are grammatical trespasses more frequent<lb/> | ||
or more gross: not those <gap/> <add>not Orthography & Concord</add>, which wound <add>a cultivated</add> | or more gross: not those <gap/> <add>not Orthography & Concord</add>, I mean, which wound the <add>a cultivated</add> ear, but which <del> affect</del> <add>those against Syntax & distinct <add>vitiate —</add></add> the <del><gap/></del> <add>meaning <add>meaning—</add></add></p><!-- End of struck out section --> | ||
<head>43. BODY Natural or Politic?</head> | <head>43. BODY Natural or Politic?</head> | ||
<p>A doubt arises (which by parenthesis <del>took not it's <gap/> but from</del> <add>would not have happened but for</add> a redundancy) whether defr<!-- end of word cut off at edge of page --><lb/> | <p>A doubt arises (which by parenthesis <del>took not <sic>it's</sic> <gap/> but from</del> <add>would not have happened but for</add> a redundancy) whether defr<!-- end of word cut off at edge of page --><lb/> | ||
a person<add> under 2. Geo.2 c.25</add> <del>was</del> <add>is</add> defrauding a Corporation <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v <unclear>Bamidgton</unclear> - Appendix.</note> — It is thought necessary to remove <add>compose</add> it by a legislative <add>new legislative</add><lb/> | a person<add> under 2. Geo.2 c.25</add> <del>was</del> <add>is</add> defrauding a Corporation <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v <unclear>Bamidgton</unclear> - Appendix.</note> — It is thought necessary to remove <add>compose</add> it by a legislative <add>new legislative</add><lb/> | ||
provision <add>interpretative for the purpose</add> — Where does the reader suppose this provision <add>interpretation</add> is to be met with? <del>At</del> <add>In</add> the<lb/> | provision <add>interpretative for the purpose</add> — Where does the reader suppose this provision <add>interpretation</add> is to be met with? <del>At</del> <add>In</add> the<lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> 78<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of a string of long Sections in <add>at the Tail of</add> a Revenue Act.<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>The words which <add>render, or which at least were thought to</add> render the <del>amendment</del> <add>supplement</add> necessary are <add | <del><gap/></del> 78<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of a string of long Sections in <add>at the Tail of</add> a Revenue Act.<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>The words which <add>render, or which at least were thought to</add> render the <del>amendment</del> <add>supplement</add> necessary are <add>or</add> with intention to defraud any person whatsoever" [§1] <del>Had it stopped at the word "defraud" the</del> <del>They would not have <unclear>had</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>would</unclear></del> It could never have <sic>enter'd</sic> into any one's head to think them so had the passage stopped at the word <hi rend='underline'>"defraud".</hi> </note> By 31. G.2. <add>c.23</add> ss.78.</p> | ||
<head>44. <foreign><del>Fiat</del> STATUTA SORTE DIGERANTUR</foreign>;</head> | <head>44. <foreign><del>Fiat</del> STATUTA SORTE DIGERANTUR</foreign>;</head> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<head>Categorical x Hypothetical 45. NUMBER. <foreign>STATUENDI FORMULAE<!-- ligature -->.</foreign></head> | <head>Categorical x Hypothetical 45. NUMBER. <foreign>STATUENDI FORMULAE<!-- ligature -->.</foreign></head> | ||
A noun in the singular number preceded by an article or pronoun indefinite is equipollent to the name noun repeated <del>b</del> in both numbers with <add><unclear> | <p>A noun in the singular number preceded by an article or pronoun indefinite is equipollent<lb/> | ||
<pb/> | |||
to the name noun repeated <del>b</del> in both numbers with <add>connected by</add> a conjunction disjunctive- —<lb/> | |||
Ex. if a person shall — if any person shall — a person who <del>sh</del> <add>shall</add><lb/> | |||
any person who shall — person here is equivalent to {person or persons"}— taken <add>steal</add><lb/> | |||
a Horse — take <add>steal</add> any Horse — Horse equipollent to {Horse or Horses}.</p> | |||
<!-- This paragraph is written in the margin but seems to be a separate section in its own right --><head>O<del>O</del>f the formularies of preception</head> | |||
<p>a Precept is either positive<lb/> | |||
or negative — the positive <unclear>retains</unclear><lb/> | |||
it's name: the negative is often stated<lb/> | |||
- <add>prohibitive</add> preceptive<lb/> | |||
Of the formularies of Legislation<lb/> | |||
The <add>The</add> form which in a strict Grammatical Sense<lb/> | |||
<del>is called</del> <add>is called</add> <unclear>imperation</unclear>, is not frequent <add>scarcely to be met with</add> in our<lb/> | |||
Laws <add>especially</add> of modern date, because that <add>form</add><lb/> | |||
<!-- gap left --> hastening to it's end, <sic>admitts</sic> not<lb/> | |||
commodiously of those modifications &<lb/> | |||
restrictions <add>circumscription of the power of abuse</add> which characterize our Legislature <add>Laws</add><lb/> | |||
so much to it's advantage<lb/></p> | |||
<head> <del>45</del> <foreign>STATUENDI FORMULAE<!-- ligature --></foreign></head> | |||
<p>In like manner the Pronoun Substantive <add>in respect to Human beings - demonstrative number</add> singular <del>is equipollent to</del> <add>followed by</add> the <gap/><lb/> | |||
<unclear>relative</unclear> and a verb of the present tense <add><hi rend='underline'>Indicative</hi></add> or future is equipollent to person or<lb/> | |||
persons <del>in the</del> <add>preceded by an adverb conditional &</add> followed by a verb of the like sense in the <add>future or</add> present<lb/> | |||
subjunctive or Indicative — {He that steals} to "If any person or persons<lb/> | |||
shall steal. <note>A Pronoun negative indicative of the the Agent agreeing with the verb denoting | |||
the action prohibited as <sic>it's</sic> nominative case <gap/> to 8.55</note> | |||
<!-- This paragraph is written in the margin but seems to be a separate section in its own right --><p>The following Rules are<lb/> | |||
constructed for the purpose of<lb/> | |||
furnishing a solution in all<lb/> | |||
cases that shall <sic>occurr</sic> on the<lb/> | |||
subject of Legislation to the<lb/> | |||
following <add>will propose to himself this standing</add> Problem - VIZ:<lb/> | |||
A Set of Ideas being given,<lb/> | |||
to express them in the fewest<lb/> | |||
words possible. <add>they will admit.</add></p> | |||
<head>46. <del><foreign>PERMISSIO</foreign></del>.</head> | |||
<p><del>He shall <gap/> <unclear>may his</unclear> <gap/> for [such an one] to do <hi rend='superscript'><unclear>01</unclear></hi> <gap/> <gap/> may do. <gap/> <gap/> Car. 2.</del> <add>25. ss88</add></p> | |||
<head><del>47 REDUNDANCY <gap/> <gap/></del></head> | |||
<p><del>Epithets</del> <add>Attributives</add> <del><unclear>imparting</unclear> Qualifications the expression of which is <add>either 1</add> superfluous because <add>not <gap/></add> the Law</del><lb/> | |||
<add>and common sense</add> <del>implies <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>sufficient</unclear> <gap/> <gap/>" 22 & 25. Car. 2. <unclear>25</unclear>. 7. <gap/> <unclear>witness</unclear>-</del> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> v. <unclear>P Carnden</unclear> & <unclear>P Mansfield</unclear>'s Arguments <add>on a point of Evidence.</add> 4 <add>to</add>.</note><lb/> | |||
or <del><gap/></del> <del>2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> Nugatory</del> | |||
<add><del>because their import is of the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> to constitute</del> it's | |||
<del><unclear>existing</unclear></del> <add><unclear>inherent</unclear></add></add> | |||
<del>as <gap/> <gap/> & <sic>discreet</sic> men</del></p> | |||
<head><del>48 <foreign>Male experimuntur per PERIPHRASIN quibus est Namen <add><gap/></add></foreign></del></head> | |||
<p><del>The last</del> <del>example</del> passage <del>may likewise be reduced</del> <del><gap/></del> <del>an example of a <unclear>principle</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>introduced to express an <gap/> <gap/> those</del> <add>strands</add> <del>appropriate <gap/> <unclear>Form</unclear> of <gap/> <gap/></del></p> | |||
<head>COMPOSITION. Statute <add>singly</add> <foreign>qua</foreign> Statute— Enacting Formulary. [L] (45, <del>46</del>) Hodge-Lodge-ness Ex. of. 43.</head> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
RS VOLUMINOUSNESS - STYLE. 7
thought in there taken to prevent. — Scarce a Statute but is loaded laden with one or more
instances of this sort
42. - v. 35. frequenting
[Not that [this violation of the Rules of Grammar] is in any case peculiar to this Statute,
for in a few printed compositions of the age, are grammatical trespasses more frequent
or more gross: not those not Orthography & Concord, I mean, which wound the a cultivated ear, but which affect those against Syntax & distinct <add>vitiate —</add> the meaning <add>meaning—</add>
43. BODY Natural or Politic?
A doubt arises (which by parenthesis took not it's but from would not have happened but for a redundancy) whether defr
a person under 2. Geo.2 c.25 was is defrauding a Corporation + + v Bamidgton - Appendix. — It is thought necessary to remove compose it by a legislative new legislative
provision interpretative for the purpose — Where does the reader suppose this provision interpretation is to be met with? At In the
78th of a string of long Sections in at the Tail of a Revenue Act.+ The words which render, or which at least were thought to render the amendment supplement necessary are or with intention to defraud any person whatsoever" [§1] Had it stopped at the word "defraud" the They would not have had would It could never have enter'd into any one's head to think them so had the passage stopped at the word "defraud". By 31. G.2. c.23 ss.78.
44. Fiat STATUTA SORTE DIGERANTUR;
If this proposal for a new arrangement should not be thought fit to be embraced, the next
would make would be to take to pieces the whole collection of Statutes and draw them by clauses
of a Lottery Wheel, [to give us] By this <add>In which means we should at least have</add> a that chance for seeing them in better order than they are
at present.
Categorical x Hypothetical 45. NUMBER. STATUENDI FORMULAE.
A noun in the singular number preceded by an article or pronoun indefinite is equipollent
---page break---
to the name noun repeated b in both numbers with connected by a conjunction disjunctive- —
Ex. if a person shall — if any person shall — a person who sh shall
any person who shall — person here is equivalent to {person or persons"}— taken steal
a Horse — take steal any Horse — Horse equipollent to {Horse or Horses}.
OOf the formularies of preception
a Precept is either positive
or negative — the positive retains
it's name: the negative is often stated
- prohibitive preceptive
Of the formularies of Legislation
The The form which in a strict Grammatical Sense
is called is called imperation, is not frequent scarcely to be met with in our
Laws especially of modern date, because that form
hastening to it's end, admitts not
commodiously of those modifications &
restrictions circumscription of the power of abuse which characterize our Legislature Laws
so much to it's advantage
45 STATUENDI FORMULAE
In like manner the Pronoun Substantive in respect to Human beings - demonstrative number singular is equipollent to followed by the
relative and a verb of the present tense Indicative or future is equipollent to person or
persons in the preceded by an adverb conditional & followed by a verb of the like sense in the future or present
subjunctive or Indicative — {He that steals} to "If any person or persons
shall steal. A Pronoun negative indicative of the the Agent agreeing with the verb denoting
the action prohibited as it's nominative case to 8.55
The following Rules are
constructed for the purpose of
furnishing a solution in all
cases that shall occurr on the
subject of Legislation to the
following will propose to himself this standing Problem - VIZ:
A Set of Ideas being given,
to express them in the fewest
words possible. they will admit.
46. PERMISSIO.
He shall may his for [such an one] to do 01 may do. Car. 2. 25. ss88
47 REDUNDANCY
Epithets Attributives imparting Qualifications the expression of which is either 1 superfluous because not the Law
and common sense implies sufficient " 22 & 25. Car. 2. 25. 7. witness- + + v. P Carnden & P Mansfield's Arguments on a point of Evidence. 4 to.
or 2dly Nugatory
because their import is of the to constitute it's
existing <add>inherent</add>
as & discreet men
48 Male experimuntur per PERIPHRASIN quibus est Namen
The last example passage may likewise be reduced an example of a principle
introduced to express an those strands appropriate Form of
COMPOSITION. Statute singly qua Statute— Enacting Formulary. [L] (45, 46) Hodge-Lodge-ness Ex. of. 43.
|
Identifier: | JB/079/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
041 |
composition statute singly qua statute - enacting formulary hodge-podge-ness |
||
|
001 |
voluminousness - style |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
cc1 |
|||
|
25483 |
|||
