JB/079/073/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:08, 4 February 2020

2) RS6

Burn 48. D. of Douglas v Lockart. Decr.18.1753
T'was out of this darkness the Court of Session gather'd that
conclusion whereby they thought the Justices within their Jurisdiction
entitled to the benefit of the protection extended
by 24.G.2.6.44. that Breast-plate to upright Magistrates
The House of Lords sitting as Judges after the matter
had travelled to them, thought otherwise: may it be
permitted to ask whether their Lordships had been
a little before as explicit in declaring such their thoughts -
while sitting as Legislators, it might only not have been better?

PROMULGATION. Provincial Languages.

Identifier: \| JB/079/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	079	Main Headings
Folio number	073	Info in main headings field	promulgation provincial languages
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25515
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>2)    <unclear>RS6</unclear></head><lb/> <note>Burn 48. D. of Douglas v Lockart. Dec<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>.18.1753</note><lb/> <p> T'was out of this darkness the Court of Session gather'd that<lb/>conclusion whereby they thought the Justices within their Jurisdiction<lb/>entitled to the benefit of the protection extended<lb/>by 24.G.2.6.44. that Breast-plate to upright Magistrates<lb/>The House of Lords sitting as Judges after the matter<lb/>had travelled to them, thought otherwise: may it be<lb/>permitted to ask whether their Lordships had been<lb/>a little before as explicit <add>in</add> declaring such their thoughts - <lb/>while sitting as Legislators, it might <del>only</del> <add>not</add> have been better? </p><lb/> <head>PROMULGATION.  Provincial Languages.</head><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<head>2)    <unclear>RS6</unclear></head><lb/>
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+<p><note>Burn 48. D. of Douglas v Lockart. Dec<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>.18.1753</note><lb/> T'was out of this darkness the Court of Session <sic>gather'd</sic> that<lb/>conclusion whereby they thought the Justices within their Jurisdiction<lb/>entitled to the benefit of the protection extended<lb/>by 24.G.2.6.44. that Breast-plate to upright Magistrates<lb/>The House of Lords sitting as Judges after the matter<lb/>had travelled to them, thought otherwise: may it be<lb/>permitted to ask whether their Lordships had been<lb/>a little before as explicit <add>in</add> declaring such their thoughts - <lb/>while sitting as Legislators, it might <del>only</del> <add>not</add> have been better? </p>
+<head>PROMULGATION.  Provincial Languages.</head>
+<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/079/073/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:08, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search