JB/079/082/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/079/082/003: Difference between revisions

Jillybean (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


not being understood to be any part of the design of those who<lb/>introduced the Law to abolish it [I mean the Custom]<lb/> and the words of the Law not being precisely levelled at it.<lb/>The Magistrates whose custom it had been, were naturally<lb/>disposed to <del>give such construction to</del> <add>continue it, and in that view</add> to give <del><gap/></del><lb/><del><gap/></del> such a construction to the Law, as had it not<lb/>been for the Custom, <del>they probably</del> would <add>probably</add> not have been<lb/>that which they would have first pitched upon.<p>paragraph</p>In the next place, the description <add>identification</add> of the <del><gap/></del> Magistrates<lb/>who are to appoint the time and place of the meeting<lb/>of these tribunals is much too lax. <del><gap/></del> "Two or more", (that is <hi rend='underline'>any</hi> two or more "of the Justices acting for the "Division" {26.G.2.r.31/4] are to make the appointment. But what<lb/>may very well happen is that one  set of "two or<lb/>"more" may join in appointing one time or place<lb/>of meeting; and another set of "two or more" may join<lb/>in appointing another: for Justices like other men may<lb/>have their disagreements. <del>In this case what is the</del> <add>Two contradictory warrants then</add><lb/><del>High Constable to do</del>one from each set are issued to<lb/>the High-Constable.  In this case what is he to do?<lb/><del>Obey <del>that</del> the warrant</del> <add>Which warrant is he to obey? that</add> which happens to come to him<lb/>first, or that which is signed by the greatest number, or that which it best suits him to obey? Suppose the numbers<lb/>equal, and that the warrants come to him nearly at<lb/>the same time; the difficulty is <sic>encreased</sic> still further. And<pb/>
<p>not being understood to be any part of the design of those who<lb/>introduced the Law to abolish it [I mean the Custom]<lb/> and the words of the Law not being precisely levelled at it.<lb/>The Magistrates whose custom it had been, were naturally<lb/>disposed to <del>give such construction to</del> <add>continue it, and in that view</add> to give <del>the</del><lb/><del>Law</del> such a construction to the Law, as had it not<lb/>been for the Custom, <del>they probably</del> would <add>probably</add> not have been<lb/>that which they would have first pitched upon.</p>
 
<p>In the next place, the description <add>identification</add> of the <del><gap/></del> Magistrates<lb/>who are to appoint the time and place of the meeting<lb/>of these tribunals is much too lax. <del><gap/></del> "Two or more",<lb/> (that is <hi rend='underline'>any</hi> two or more "of the Justices acting for the<lb/> "Division" [26.G.2.r.31/4] are to make the appointment. But what<lb/>may very well happen is that one  set of "two or<lb/>"more" may join in appointing one time or place<lb/>of meeting; and another set of "two or more" may join<lb/>in appointing another: for Justices like other men may<lb/>have their disagreements. <del>In this case what is the</del> <add>Two contradictory warrants then</add><lb/><del>High Constable to do</del> one from each set are issued to<lb/>the High-Constable.  In this case what is he to do?<lb/><del>Obey that the warrant</del> <add>Which warrant is he to obey? that</add> which happens to come to him<lb/>first, or that which is signed by the greatest number,<lb/> or that which it best suits him to obey? Suppose the numbers<lb/>equal, and that the warrants come to him nearly at<lb/>the same time; the difficulty is <sic>encreased</sic> still further. And</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:08, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

not being understood to be any part of the design of those who
introduced the Law to abolish it [I mean the Custom]
and the words of the Law not being precisely levelled at it.
The Magistrates whose custom it had been, were naturally
disposed to give such construction to continue it, and in that view to give the
Law such a construction to the Law, as had it not
been for the Custom, they probably would probably not have been
that which they would have first pitched upon.

In the next place, the description identification of the Magistrates
who are to appoint the time and place of the meeting
of these tribunals is much too lax. "Two or more",
(that is any two or more "of the Justices acting for the
"Division" [26.G.2.r.31/4] are to make the appointment. But what
may very well happen is that one set of "two or
"more" may join in appointing one time or place
of meeting; and another set of "two or more" may join
in appointing another: for Justices like other men may
have their disagreements. In this case what is the Two contradictory warrants then
High Constable to do one from each set are issued to
the High-Constable. In this case what is he to do?
Obey that the warrant Which warrant is he to obey? that which happens to come to him
first, or that which is signed by the greatest number,
or that which it best suits him to obey? Suppose the numbers
equal, and that the warrants come to him nearly at
the same time; the difficulty is encreased still further. And



Identifier: | JB/079/082/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

082

Info in main headings field

digest publican's law observations

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1 / / / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25524

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in