★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
some pains. </p> | some pains. </p> | ||
<p><del><gap/></del><lb/> <del>thus stands the <gap/></del> <lb/> Upon this footing stands the use of the Recognizance<lb/> with respect to the principal [in the obligation] <lb/>With respect to the Sureties it is <add>the case is</add> different. From <lb/> persons binding themselves as sureties an express <lb/>consent must <add> indeed</add> be taken: for it is only a <lb/> <del>male</del> free <lb/>and <unclear>unexacted</unclear> consent that in such a case can<lb/> warrant the Law to make one man punishable for the<lb/> <del>faults <add><del>offen</del> <add>transgression | <p><del><gap/></del><lb/> <del>thus stands the <gap/></del> <lb/> Upon this footing stands the use of the Recognizance<lb/> with respect to the principal [in the obligation] <lb/>With respect to the Sureties it is <add>the case is</add> different. From <lb/> persons binding themselves as sureties an express <lb/>consent must <add> indeed</add> be taken: for it is only a <lb/> <del>male</del> free <lb/>and <unclear>unexacted</unclear> consent that in such a case can<lb/> warrant the Law to make one man punishable for the<lb/> <del>faults</del> <add><del>offen</del> <add>transgression</add></add> of another. A man can have <add>To such an obligation</add> no <add>other</add> inducement<lb/> to submit himself but special good will towards<lb/> the party whom he is to be bound for. Who is willing</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
(6
Observations.Inferenda.
Recognizance.
it should seem is not much lessen'd when they are told
that under the same penalties they must consent to
the obligation. To a man + + of plain unsophisticated understanding [whose conception of things is not
sophisticated puzzled by technical sophistry discourse], the formality obligation
of giving consent promising of taking a journey in order
to pronounce words of consent [would appear to be
but a hardship] instead of lessening the hardship would
appear to add to it: especially when for the liberty
of pronouncing these words, [a man is finds himself obliged
to pay.] he is made to pay.
To some this what has been said may appear much more than is was necessary;
But the substance of the Law is every where so thick involved
in [so thick] a veil of sophistry, that to hear it at off in any
part can not [but be a work of labour trouble.] be done without
some pains.
thus stands the
Upon this footing stands the use of the Recognizance
with respect to the principal [in the obligation]
With respect to the Sureties it is the case is different. From
persons binding themselves as sureties an express
consent must indeed be taken: for it is only a
male free
and unexacted consent that in such a case can
warrant the Law to make one man punishable for the
faults offen <add>transgression</add> of another. A man can have To such an obligation no other inducement
to submit himself but special good will towards
the party whom he is to be bound for. Who is willing
|
Identifier: | JB/079/094/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
094 |
observations |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
b5 / e6 / b7 e7 / e8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]] |
||
|
25536 |
|||
