JB/079/132/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/132/003: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>Sect. XII. Persons at Large.<lb/> Art. II.</head>
<head>Sect. XII. Persons at Large.<lb/> Art. II.</head>
<p>Whoso willfully <sic>committeth</sic> mischief on any Turnpike <lb/>road, by defacing damaging or removing any<lb/> work of wood stone or other material placed or <lb/>thrown up [1] for the <del>security</del> <add>guarding</add> of a causeway, [or|2] for <lb/>the <unclear>forcing</unclear> off of <del><gap/></del> <add>any</add> water or hollow place] or [3]<lb/> [for the marking of a boundary], or [4]for the direction, <lb/> <add>of travellers</add> or [5] [for the lighting of the road] or [6]for the purpose <lb/>of a bridge, or [7 for draining <add>off</add> of water, or [8]for any<lb/> other purpose of use or ornament, not mentioned<lb/> in the Article following, shall forfeit <add>a Sum</add> not less than <lb/>10<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> nor more than £5.</p>
<p>Whoso willfully committeth mischief on any Turnpike <lb/>road, by defacing damaging or removing any<lb/> work of wood stone or other material placed or <lb/>thrown up [1] for the <del>security</del> <add>guarding</add> of a causeway, [or|2] for <lb/>the fencing off of <del>water</del> <add>any</add> water or hollow place] or [3]<lb/> [for the marking of a boundary], or [4]for the direction, <lb/> <add>of travellers</add> or [5] [for the lighting of the road] or [6]for the purpose <lb/>of a bridge, or [7 for draining <add>off</add> of water, or [8]for any<lb/> other purpose of use or ornament, not mentioned<lb/> in the Article following, shall forfeit <add>a Sum</add> not less than <lb/>10<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> nor more than £5.</p>
----
 
   
   
<head>Observations.</head>
<head>Observations.</head>
<p>Great are the pains taken in this laborious preamble <lb/>to persuade men of what nobody ever yet could doubt <lb/>of. <del><gap/> advanced however to</del> <add>It may be a means perhaps of inducing</add> a compiler to<lb/> save himself this trouble, <del>or may</del> <add>to</add> observe to him, that <lb/>the mischief he means to guard against is either <lb/>possible <add>or not</add>; if it <hi rend='underline'>is</hi>, one may then venture to say to him forbid it boldly; credit will hardly be refused you for having<lb/> supposed as much: if <del>it is</del> not, 'tis not what you say will make it so.</p>  
<p>Great are the pains taken in this laborious preamble <lb/>to persuade men of what nobody ever yet could doubt <lb/>of. <del><gap/> advanced however to</del> <add>It may be a means perhaps of inducing</add> a compiler to<lb/> save himself this trouble, <del>or may</del> <add>to</add> observe to him, that <lb/>the mischief he means to guard against is either <lb/>possible <add>or not</add>; if it <hi rend='underline'>is</hi>, one may then venture to say to him forbid it boldly; credit will hardly be refused you for having<lb/> supposed as much: if <del>it is</del> not, 'tis not what you say will make it so.</p>  


<p>It may be worth while to hear L<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Bacon's sentiments of <del>a</del> clauses <add>thus</add> constructed <del>in this manner</del>. " <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>De Augm. Scienti<hi rend='superscript'>m</hi> L.8.c.3.Aphor<del><gap/></del> 71.</note> <foreign>Est vers genus <unclear>persevibendi</unclear> <lb/>leges valdi vitiosum. Cum sciticet casus ad quem lex collvinat, fute <del><gap/></del> exprimetier in preambulo: deinde ex vi verbi [tulis<lb/> aut hujiusmodi relativi, corpus legis retro vertitur in preambulum, unde preambulum inseritur et incorporatur ipse lege: <lb/>Quod et obscurum est, &amp; ininus tutum; quia non eadem ad hiberi consuivet diligentia in ponderandis et examinandis <lb/>verbis preambuli, qua adhibitior in corpore ipsius legis."</foreign> <!-- (with apologies) --> One way there is of composing laws that is very virtuous. To<lb/> <unclear>con't.</unclear> when the case whereat the law is levelled, is diffusely expressed in the preamble; whereupon by force of the word <lb/>[such] (or the like relative) the body of the law is turned back <del>onto</del> <add>upon</add> the preamble, which by this means becomes inserted into,<lb/> &amp; incorporated with, the law itself. Now this is both <del>unsafe and</del> <add>not less unsafe than it is obscure:</add> obscure and <add>even</add> unsafe: since the words of the preamble are <lb/>seldom weighed and examined with <del>diligence</del> <add>attention</add> which is bestowed upon the [body of the] law itself."</p>  
<p>It may be worth while to hear L<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Bacon's sentiments of <del>a</del> clauses <add>thus</add> constructed <del>in this manner</del>. " <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>De Augm. Scienti<hi rend='superscript'>m</hi> L.8.c.3.Aphor<del><gap/></del> 71.</note> <foreign>Est vers genus <unclear>persevibendi</unclear> <lb/>leges valdi vitiosum. Cum sciticet casus ad quem lex collvinat, fute <del><gap/></del> exprimetier in preambulo: deinde ex vi verbi [tulis<lb/> aut hujiusmodi relativi, corpus legis retro vertitur in preambulum, unde preambulum inseritur et incorporatur ipse lege: <lb/>Quod et obscurum est, &amp; ininus tutum; quia non eadem ad hiberi consuivet diligentia in ponderandis et examinandis <lb/>verbis preambuli, qua adhibitior in corpore ipsius legis."</foreign> <!-- (with apologies) --> One way there is of composing laws that is very virtuous. To<lb/> <unclear>con't.</unclear> when the case whereat the law is levelled, is diffusely expressed in the preamble; whereupon by force of the word <lb/>[such] (or the like relative) the body of the law is turned back <del>onto</del> <add>upon</add> the preamble, which by this means becomes inserted into,<lb/> &amp; incorporated with, the law itself. Now this is both <del>unsafe and</del> <add>not less unsafe than it is obscure:</add> obscure and <add>even</add> unsafe: since the words of the preamble are <lb/>seldom weighed and examined with that <del>diligence</del> <add>attention</add> which is bestowed upon the [body of the] law itself."</p>  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p><del>Whether the</del> <add>With what</add> attention <del>with which</del> <hi rend='underline'>this</hi> law has been weighed <add>and examined</add> <del>is sufficient</del> may be partly <del>seen</del> <add>judged</add> from those <add>the several</add> supplements <add>included in brackets</add> <lb/>which <del>I have thought</del> <add>it has appeared</add> necessary to insert <del>in brackets</del>. The variety of work indeed which on some occasion or other <lb/>may find a place upon a turnpike-road is such, as I could not see any certainty of being able to cover without<lb/> some such <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> words as those in no<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> [8]<hi rend='superscript'>a</hi>: which words, <add>indeed</add> were I to <del><gap/> my <gap/> <gap/> should</del> <add>judge, might</add> serve for<lb/> all the rest.</p>


<p>Two questions I must submit before I conclude this Article &#x2014; one, whither it <del>would</del> <add>might</add> not be better to make the <del>value</del> <add>quantums</add> <lb/>of the damage the measure of the punishment, <add>within the limits here prescribed,</add> instead of leaving it thus at large? another, whether a compensation <lb/>should not be required from the author <add>to be ascertained and <sic>recover'd</sic> in the same summary way</add> of a damage that may appear <hi rend='underline'>involuntary?</hi> If so, then the <hi rend='underline'>compensation</hi> for <lb/>the <del>latter</del> <add>damage</add> would of course be the single value, &amp; the <hi rend='underline'>penalty</hi> for the mischief might be augmentable <add>at the discretion of the Magistrate</add> as far as to the<lb/> Treble. This Idea (<del>if I may <gap/></del> to digress a moment) if applied universally <add>2</add> <del>with </del>  <add>under<add>3</add></add> certain modifications and restrictions<lb/> to the crimes of <hi rend='underline'>mischief</hi> and of <hi rend='underline'>Theft</hi> <add>1</add> would reduce those unmeasurable <add>inordinate<add>5</add></add> Titles <add>of our Lsw</add> many <add>2</add> hundred-<add>3</add>fold<add>6</add>. </p>


<p><add>2</add> Under which of the denominations specified in the original would the Iron-rails come, for example, that are placed<lb/> round the obelisk near Black <sic>Friers</sic>? Or those venerable <sic>relicks</sic> of antiquity themselves, which under the name of <lb/> Crosses, have been erected on some of our Public Roads? or Statues with the fences for their protection? or monuments<lb/> like that on Lansdown? And why must the upper parts only of Bridges, &amp;<add>2</add> not<add>3</add> the main-work be protected from damage? </p>


<pb/>
<head>Sect. XXXI.</head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:08, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Sect. XII. Persons at Large.
Art. II.

Whoso willfully committeth mischief on any Turnpike
road, by defacing damaging or removing any
work of wood stone or other material placed or
thrown up [1] for the security guarding of a causeway, [or|2] for
the fencing off of water any water or hollow place] or [3]
[for the marking of a boundary], or [4]for the direction,
of travellers or [5] [for the lighting of the road] or [6]for the purpose
of a bridge, or [7 for draining off of water, or [8]for any
other purpose of use or ornament, not mentioned
in the Article following, shall forfeit a Sum not less than
10s nor more than £5.


Observations.

Great are the pains taken in this laborious preamble
to persuade men of what nobody ever yet could doubt
of. advanced however to It may be a means perhaps of inducing a compiler to
save himself this trouble, or may to observe to him, that
the mischief he means to guard against is either
possible or not; if it is, one may then venture to say to him forbid it boldly; credit will hardly be refused you for having
supposed as much: if it is not, 'tis not what you say will make it so.

It may be worth while to hear Ld Bacon's sentiments of a clauses thus constructed in this manner. " + +De Augm. Scientim L.8.c.3.Aphor 71. Est vers genus persevibendi
leges valdi vitiosum. Cum sciticet casus ad quem lex collvinat, fute exprimetier in preambulo: deinde ex vi verbi [tulis
aut hujiusmodi relativi, corpus legis retro vertitur in preambulum, unde preambulum inseritur et incorporatur ipse lege:
Quod et obscurum est, & ininus tutum; quia non eadem ad hiberi consuivet diligentia in ponderandis et examinandis
verbis preambuli, qua adhibitior in corpore ipsius legis."
One way there is of composing laws that is very virtuous. To
con't. when the case whereat the law is levelled, is diffusely expressed in the preamble; whereupon by force of the word
[such] (or the like relative) the body of the law is turned back onto upon the preamble, which by this means becomes inserted into,
& incorporated with, the law itself. Now this is both unsafe and not less unsafe than it is obscure: obscure and even unsafe: since the words of the preamble are
seldom weighed and examined with that diligence attention which is bestowed upon the [body of the] law itself."

Whether the With what attention with which this law has been weighed and examined is sufficient may be partly seen judged from those the several supplements included in brackets
which I have thought it has appeared necessary to insert in brackets. The variety of work indeed which on some occasion or other
may find a place upon a turnpike-road is such, as I could not see any certainty of being able to cover without
some such general words as those in nor [8]a: which words, indeed were I to my should judge, might serve for
all the rest.

Two questions I must submit before I conclude this Article — one, whither it would might not be better to make the value quantums
of the damage the measure of the punishment, within the limits here prescribed, instead of leaving it thus at large? another, whether a compensation
should not be required from the author to be ascertained and recover'd in the same summary way of a damage that may appear involuntary? If so, then the compensation for
the latter damage would of course be the single value, & the penalty for the mischief might be augmentable at the discretion of the Magistrate as far as to the
Treble. This Idea (if I may to digress a moment) if applied universally 2 with under<add>3</add> certain modifications and restrictions
to the crimes of mischief and of Theft 1 would reduce those unmeasurable inordinate<add>5</add> Titles of our Lsw many 2 hundred-3fold6.

2 Under which of the denominations specified in the original would the Iron-rails come, for example, that are placed
round the obelisk near Black Friers? Or those venerable relicks of antiquity themselves, which under the name of
Crosses, have been erected on some of our Public Roads? or Statues with the fences for their protection? or monuments
like that on Lansdown? And why must the upper parts only of Bridges, &2 not3 the main-work be protected from damage?


---page break---

Sect. XXXI.



Identifier: | JB/079/132/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

079

Main Headings

Folio number

132

Info in main headings field

sect. xii new persons at large orig.

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25574

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in