JB/095/005/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/095/005/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>TU-R-N-E. ACT. New. Prelude. V</head>
<head>TU-R-N-P. ACT. New. Prelude. V</head>


<p><del>By thus increasing <add>of</add> the surface, I flatter myself I<lb/>
<p><del>By thus increasing <add>of</add> the surface, I flatter myself I<lb/>
Line 13: Line 13:


<p><note>Distribution</note>
<p><note>Distribution</note>
The <del><gap/></del> first Sections <add>(after the interpretation <unclear>one</unclear></add> compose what may be <sic>stiled</sic> the<lb/>
The <del><gap/></del> first Sections <add>(after the interpretation one</add> compose what may be <sic>stiled</sic> the<lb/>
Constitutional part of the Law belonging to this Title,<lb/>
Constitutional part of the Law belonging to this Title,<lb/>
that which concerns the <del>powers of</del> Funds of this little<lb/>
that which concerns the <del>powers of</del> Funds of this little<lb/>
Line 27: Line 27:
to be inserted <add>added to</add> under any Title? that regulation <add>as every other</add> must<lb/>
to be inserted <add>added to</add> under any Title? that regulation <add>as every other</add> must<lb/>
concern <add>one, at least,</add> a certain class of persons &#x2014; it must prescribe<lb/>
concern <add>one, at least,</add> a certain class of persons &#x2014; it must prescribe<lb/>
their Duties, or impose on them restraints.</p><pb/>
their Duties, or impose on them restraints.</p>
 
 
<pb/>
 
 
<p>That class is either one noticed <del>before</del> by the Law <add>before</add>, or<lb/>
now for the first time. <add><del>Are</del></add> <del>Is it</del> <add>then</add> in the first <add>of <unclear>these</unclear></add> cases? The<lb/>
regulations in question add one or more Articles to a<lb/>
subsisting Section? Is it in the latter case? They go to compose<lb/>
a new one. <note>The <sic>Burthen</sic> of the Law meantime, to <del>the <gap/> of any but those</del> <add>no other class but that</add> immediately affected by the new addition it receives, no way <del><gap/></del> increasing its dimensions <del>The <sic>Burthen</sic> of the Law <gap/> <gap/> <add>increasing</add> <gap/> <gap/> its dimensions [<gap/>] to the <unclear>cases</unclear> of <unclear>those most</unclear> affected by the <unclear>new</unclear> <gap/></del> receives <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del></note>
Is my addition or alteration become<lb/>
requisite in the <del>course</del> <add>respecting <add>apparatus</add></add> the course of <add>judicial</add> procedure? <unclear>Would</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>finds</unclear> it's appointed station in the Section destined to that purpose.<lb/>
It there stands moreover in a state of probation<lb/>
<del>to be received into the course of procedure belonging to other</del> <add>ready to be adopted if found useful, into other Titles</add><lb/>
<del>Titles</del> &#x2014; Is there any single word or two the import<lb/>
of which <add>not sufficiently established or explained?</add> has been thought to require <add>to be fixed</add> <add>a Definition or</add>  an explanation? There<lb/>
is the first <del><gap/></del> Section of the Code <add>Statute <add>Title</add></add> <del>always</del> open to receive<lb/>
it. Is there any Article the general texture of<lb/>
which is thought to be defective? It is only to recast it<lb/>
<add>Under</add> In all these alterations <add>will</add> the simplicity <add><unclear>party</unclear></add> of the Plan, <add><hi rend='underline'>will</hi></add><lb/>
(<add>assuredly</add> at least it <hi rend='underline'>may</hi>) remain inviolate.</p>
 
<p><note>Methodistica Polychresta</note>
Those who know the universal <del>use that method is of</del> <add>application that the Rules of</add><lb/>
<add>method are capable of to</add> is all <gap/>, &amp; indeed to every subject of consideration<lb/>
<del>will not think any <gap/></del> <add>&amp; that <del>its rules are</del> <add><del>they</del> are</add> never</add> so <del>useful</del>  <unclear>serviceable</unclear> as when they <add>are are made to arise</add><lb/>
accompanied by examples, [will not think any <hi rend='underline'>pains</hi><lb/>
misemploy'd <unclear>inertly</unclear> by being employed <add>upon this topic <add>manner</add></add> in this way.] <note>will more readily <sic>admitt</sic> of an excuse for this transgression</note></p>
 
<pb/>  


<p>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Barrington in his observations on the <add><gap/></add> Statutes,<lb/>
<p>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Barrington in his observations on the <add><gap/></add> Statutes,<lb/>
Line 38: Line 69:
blemishes on which I shall have <unclear>reason</unclear> to<lb/>
blemishes on which I shall have <unclear>reason</unclear> to<lb/>
<gap/> arise from the case's being otherwise<lb/>
<gap/> arise from the case's being otherwise<lb/>
In a <unclear>numerous</unclear> &amp; mixed assembly, there are always<lb/>
In a numerous &amp; mixed assembly, there are always<lb/>
more who are ready with patches <add>of their own</add> to put in, than<lb/>
more who are ready with patches <add>of their own</add> to put in, than<lb/>
who have well studied <add>consider'd</add> the texture of the ground, whether<lb/>
who have well studied <add><sic>consider'd</sic></add> the texture of the ground, whether<lb/>
it <del>wanted such patches or will</del> <add>be such as those patches are wanting for</add> or will<lb/>
it <del>wanted such patches or will</del> <add>be such as those patches are wanting for</add> or will<lb/>
suit with. <note>If I may be indulged with an observation a little out of time To introduce the observation a little out of its place</note> The more this is apt to be the case,<lb/>
suit with. <note>If I may be indulged with an observation a little out of time To introduce the observation a little out of its place</note> The more this is apt to be the case,<lb/>
Line 46: Line 77:
for cutting out the work which all may keep<lb/>
for cutting out the work which all may keep<lb/>
before them &amp; conform to, <add>to</add> be investigated, if possible,<lb/>
before them &amp; conform to, <add>to</add> be investigated, if possible,<lb/>
&amp; agreed on.</p><pb/>
&amp; agreed on.</p>
 
 


<p>So long as the <del>Collection</del> <add>Statute Books</add> remains in it's present state<lb/>
<p>So long as the <del>Collection</del> <add>Statute Books</add> remains in it's present state<lb/>
of <add>[exemplary]</add> confusion, these remarks as far as they serve to<lb/>
of <add>[exemplary]</add> confusion, these remarks as far as they serve to<lb/>
<add>exemplify</add> shew the consequences of want of system, will never<lb/>
<add>exemplify</add> shew the consequences of want of system, will never<lb/>
be out of season.</p><pb/>
be out of season.</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p>Many of the errors <unclear>pointed</unclear> out, <del><gap/></del> <add>in the <gap/></add> Act, share the<lb/>
satisfaction of seeing rectified in the new one: the<lb/>
use however of the passages which point them out<lb/>
will not on that account be altogether superceded:<lb/>
they will still serve <del>to</del> in the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> place to justify<lb/>
[to the public] <add>the necessity of</add> those alterations <add>that have been made</add>, &amp; to <del>shew</del> point out <add>to</add><lb/>
<add>all along to</add> the cause, (the want of system <add>means</add>) <del>that</del> which made<lb/>
them necassary. <note>&amp; to refer them all along to that <unclear>precise</unclear> &amp; universal cause, which originally gave birth to it</note></p>
 
<p>When I declare, as I do, not less through conviction,<lb/>
than out of ........<lb/>
that<lb/>
I shall I hope be acquitted of entertaining any personal<lb/>
design. [<gap/> this before <unclear>for</unclear> opposite. <add>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Barrington</add></p><pb/>
 
<p>As no man takes to himself an observation <add>a remark</add> made to<lb/>
the prejudice of human nature.</p>
 
<p>This I hope will be sufficient to obviate the undesigned<lb/>
effects of any thing that might be <add>to some</add> a cause<lb/>
of pain, &amp; or to others of malicious pleasure.</p>
 
<p>The blame will lie not on him who pushed <add>driven <add><gap/></add></add> on by<lb/>
habit &amp; example <note>in the current of habit &amp; example</note><lb/>
contributes to the accumulation of the evil, but on<lb/>
any one <add>him only</add>, who recognizing within himself the efficacy of a<lb/>
remedy, <note><gap/> apply it</note> should forbear from indolence or a worse motive<lb/>
to concur in it's application.</p>


<p>That class is either one noticed <del>before</del> by the Law <add>before</add>, or<lb/>
now for the first time. <add><del>Are</del></add> <del>Is it</del> <add>then</add> in the first <add>of <unclear>these</unclear></add> cases? The<lb/>
regulations in question add one or more Articles to a<lb/>
subsisting Section? Is it in the latter case? They go to compose<lb/>
a new one. <note>The <sic>Burthen</sic> of the Law meantime, to <del>the <gap/> of any but those</del> <add>no other class but that</add> immediately affected by the new addition it receives, no way <del><gap/></del> increasing its dimensions <del>The <sic>Burthen</sic> of the Law <gap/> <gap/> <add>increasing</add> <gap/> <gap/> its dimensions [<gap/>] to the <unclear>cases</unclear> of <unclear>those most</unclear> affected by the <unclear>new</unclear> <gap/></del> receives <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del></note>
Is my addition or alteration become<lb/>
requisite in the <del>course</del> <add>respecting <add>apparatus</add></add> the course of <add>judicial</add> procedure? <unclear>Would</unclear><lb/>
<unclear>finds</unclear> it's appointed station in the Section destined to that purpose.<lb/>
It there stands moreover in a state of probation<lb/>
<del>to be received into the course of procedure belonging to other</del> <add>ready to be adopted if found useful, into other Titles</add><lb/>
<del>Titles</del> &#x2014; Is there any single word or two the import<lb/>
of which <add>not sufficiently established or explained?</add> has been thought to require <add>to be fixed</add> <add>a Definition or</add>  an explanation? There<lb/>
is the first <del><gap/></del> Section of the Code <add>Statute <add>Title</add></add> <del>always</del> open to receive<lb/>
it. Is there any Article the general texture of<lb/>
which is thought to be defective? It is only to recast it<lb/>
<add>Under</add> In all these alterations <add>will</add> the simplicity <add><unclear>party</unclear></add> of the Plan, <add><hi rend='underline'>will</hi></add><lb/>
(<add>assuredly</add> at least it <hi rend='underline'>may</hi>) remain inviolate.</p> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:10, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

TU-R-N-P. ACT. New. Prelude. V

By thus increasing of the surface, I flatter myself I
have done something towards the rendering it transparent. giving it transparency

Short sentences. I flatter myself I have done something is done towards the giving
transparency to the composition, by thus increasing of the
surface

Distribution The first Sections (after the interpretation one compose what may be stiled the
Constitutional part of the Law belonging to this Title,
that which concerns the powers of Funds of this little
Aristocracy, with the powers & duties of it's superior & inferior
members. The rest regards the different classes
of persons who are subject to come within the
sphere of it's Jurisdiction

Method perpetual. This principle of order once being [well] infused established, will be their needs
no other to the end of Time to keep the whole System from relaxing
into confusion. Is a new regulation thought fit
to be inserted added to under any Title? that regulation as every other must
concern one, at least, a certain class of persons — it must prescribe
their Duties, or impose on them restraints.



---page break---


That class is either one noticed before by the Law before, or
now for the first time. Are Is it then in the first of these cases? The
regulations in question add one or more Articles to a
subsisting Section? Is it in the latter case? They go to compose
a new one. The Burthen of the Law meantime, to the of any but those no other class but that immediately affected by the new addition it receives, no way increasing its dimensions The Burthen of the Law increasing its dimensions [] to the cases of those most affected by the new receives Is my addition or alteration become
requisite in the course respecting <add>apparatus</add> the course of judicial procedure? Would
finds it's appointed station in the Section destined to that purpose.
It there stands moreover in a state of probation
to be received into the course of procedure belonging to other ready to be adopted if found useful, into other Titles
Titles — Is there any single word or two the import
of which not sufficiently established or explained? has been thought to require to be fixed a Definition or an explanation? There
is the first Section of the Code Statute <add>Title</add> always open to receive
it. Is there any Article the general texture of
which is thought to be defective? It is only to recast it
Under In all these alterations will the simplicity party of the Plan, will
(assuredly at least it may) remain inviolate.

Methodistica Polychresta Those who know the universal use that method is of application that the Rules of
method are capable of to is all , & indeed to every subject of consideration
will not think any & that its rules are <add>they are never</add> so useful serviceable as when they are are made to arise
accompanied by examples, [will not think any pains
misemploy'd inertly by being employed upon this topic <add>manner</add> in this way.] will more readily admitt of an excuse for this transgression


---page break---

Mr Barrington in his observations on the Statutes,
has very properly observed made a very proper observation that for certain purposes
the Statute Book collection of these Instruments is may be regarded as the work of
the same Author. It is therefore still a much less
stretch of fancy to regard each Statute by itself in the this same
light: which I shall take the liberty to do, for the convenience of discourse for shortness,
although to speak justly many of the
blemishes on which I shall have reason to
arise from the case's being otherwise
In a numerous & mixed assembly, there are always
more who are ready with patches of their own to put in, than
who have well studied consider'd the texture of the ground, whether
it wanted such patches or will be such as those patches are wanting for or will
suit with. If I may be indulged with an observation a little out of time To introduce the observation a little out of its place The more this is apt to be the case,
the more call is there is for some general plan
for cutting out the work which all may keep
before them & conform to, to be investigated, if possible,
& agreed on.


So long as the Collection Statute Books remains in it's present state
of [exemplary] confusion, these remarks as far as they serve to
exemplify shew the consequences of want of system, will never
be out of season.


---page break---

Many of the errors pointed out, in the Act, share the
satisfaction of seeing rectified in the new one: the
use however of the passages which point them out
will not on that account be altogether superceded:
they will still serve to in the 1st place to justify
[to the public] the necessity of those alterations that have been made, & to shew point out to
all along to the cause, (the want of system means) that which made
them necassary. & to refer them all along to that precise & universal cause, which originally gave birth to it

When I declare, as I do, not less through conviction,
than out of ........
that
I shall I hope be acquitted of entertaining any personal
design. [ this before for opposite. Mr Barrington


---page break---

As no man takes to himself an observation a remark made to
the prejudice of human nature.

This I hope will be sufficient to obviate the undesigned
effects of any thing that might be to some a cause
of pain, & or to others of malicious pleasure.

The blame will lie not on him who pushed driven <add></add> on by
habit & example in the current of habit & example
contributes to the accumulation of the evil, but on
any one him only, who recognizing within himself the efficacy of a
remedy, apply it should forbear from indolence or a worse motive
to concur in it's application.




Identifier: | JB/095/005/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

turnp. act new prelude v

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30891

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in