JB/095/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/095/081/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>PROCEDURE</head>
<head>PROCEDURE</head>
<head>TURNP. ACT Observations on</head>
<head>TURNP. ACT Observations on</head>
<head>159 ss49</head>
<head>159 §49</head>
<p><note>Evidence</note> It is <del>true that if</del> <add><unclear>odds</unclear> therefore</add> but a Magistrate <add>unversed in business</add>, by the perusal of this<lb/>
<p><note>Evidence</note> It is <del>true that if</del> <add>adds therefore</add> but a Magistrate <add>unversed in business</add>, by the perusal of this<lb/>
general Title, is prepossessed against it <add>the truth.</add> It is true if<lb/>
general Title, is prepossessed against it <add>the truth.</add> It is true if<lb/>
he has the good luck to open the Book at the <del>Title</del> of <add>he may find it in the Introduction: but it is not everyone who</add> <note>will think of looking into that Title for an Axiom <del><gap/></del> omitted in another to which it seems so intimately to belong.</note> <lb/>
he has the good luck to open the Book at the <del>Title</del> of <add>he may find it in the Introduction: but it is not everyone who</add> <note>will think of looking into that Title for an Axiom <del><gap/></del> omitted in another to which it seems so intimately to belong.</note> <lb/>
Line 22: Line 22:
<del>for the truth</del> <add>of the authority </add> of the maxim: <del>an experienced</del> <add>a</add> Councel<lb/>
<del>for the truth</del> <add>of the authority </add> of the maxim: <del>an experienced</del> <add>a</add> Councel<lb/>
giving up his <add>Client's</add> cause.</p>
giving up his <add>Client's</add> cause.</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>


<head>PROCEDURE 162. ss 53</head>
<head>PROCEDURE 162. § 53</head>
<p><note>Trustees to grant warrant of Distress</note>
<p><note>Trustees to grant warrant of Distress</note>
The great Trust to repose is that of sitting in Judgment<lb/>
The great Trust to repose is that of sitting in Judgment<lb/>
Line 30: Line 31:
follows is of course: &amp; it should seem might as well<lb/>
follows is of course: &amp; it should seem might as well<lb/>
be entrusted to persons <add>Commissioners of Turnpikes</add> of this description, as to Commissioners<lb/>
be entrusted to persons <add>Commissioners of Turnpikes</add> of this description, as to Commissioners<lb/>
of Land-Tax, Window Tax &amp; Sewers <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> Qu. Hawkers &amp;c Salt duties</note></p>  
of Land-Tax, Window Tax &amp; Sewers <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <lb/> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> Qu. Hawkers &amp;c Salt duties</note></p>  


<head>163. ss 53</head>
<head>163. § 53</head>
<p><note>Quorum <add>to be</add> constant?</note>
<p><note>Quorum <add>to be</add> constant?</note><lb/>
Should the Quorum <add>of Trustees</add> consist <del><gap/></del> in every step of the<lb/>
Should the Quorum <add>of Trustees</add> consist <del><gap/></del> in every step of the<lb/>
procedure of the same persons? I should think it<lb/>
procedure of the same persons? I should think it<lb/>
Line 42: Line 43:
<pb/>
<pb/>


<head>163 ss 53.</head>  
<head>163 § 53.</head>  
<p><note>PROCEDURE</note> is to shift from <add>one</add> Justice to another &#x2014; there seems no necessity <add>reason</add><lb/>
<p><note>PROCEDURE</note> is to shift from <add>one</add> Justice to another &#x2014; there seems no necessity <add>reason</add><lb/>
why precisely the same act as issued a Warrant<lb/>
why precisely the same act as issued a Warrant<lb/>
of Distress should settle the charges of it when made.<lb/>
of Distress should settle the charges of it when made.<lb/>
Yet perhaps it might be useful to require that one <lb/>
Yet perhaps it might be useful to require that one <lb/>
or 2 of those who proceeded <add><unclear>sat</unclear></add> at the taking of the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi><lb/>
or 2 of those who proceeded <add>sat</add> at the taking of the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi><lb/>
step in the <add>a</add> prosecution should sit <add>proceed</add> throughout.</p>
step in the <add>a</add> prosecution should sit <add>proceed</add> throughout.</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
<head>PROCEDURE 167 § 49</head>
<p><note>EVIDENCE</note>
I think there must be some Millions of people in this<lb/>
Country, who would be long enough before they would be<lb/>
able to guess how it should ever have happened, that<lb/>
their living in a place where a man had done what<lb/>
a Turnpike Act <add>had</add> bid him not do should make them<lb/>
not fit to be believed: tho' at the same time not one<lb/>
of them all, but will <del>acknowledge</del> <add>see a good</add> general foundation<lb/>
for the rule, that an interested person ought<lb/>
not to be a witness. &#x2014; When words cost so little<lb/>
it <del>is</del> <add>would be</add> a pity to leave the Law a riddle for want<lb/>
of 2 such little <add>moderate</add> ones as these.</p>
<head>168 § 56</head>
<p><note>Appeal</note>
A person's thinking himself aggrieved, <sic>tho'</sic> made a<lb/>
condition of his being permitted to appeal, is one of those<lb/>
matters <add>facts</add> which like the instigation of the Devil in<lb/>
a Murder, it is not necessary to bring witnesses to<lb/>
prove: if nothing was said about either of them, the<lb/>
Law would not be much the worse.</p>


   
   


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE TURNP. ACT Observations on 159 §49

Evidence It is true that if adds therefore but a Magistrate unversed in business, by the perusal of this
general Title, is prepossessed against it the truth. It is true if
he has the good luck to open the Book at the Title of he may find it in the Introduction: but it is not everyone who will think of looking into that Title for an Axiom omitted in another to which it seems so intimately to belong.
Introduction. p. 28

he may there find a where
this evidence in question has been holden to be incompetent: but then,
do not in order to know what is Law under the Title do
not of their own hands turn to that of the Introduction

From these considerations I make no doubt but that many
a conviction has very innocently been passed in violation of this
rule: one I happen to have met with that is on
record + + 3. Burrns 1473. it is one by the bye, that affords the strongest
kind of confirmation (were it wanting) that can be given
for the truth of the authority of the maxim: an experienced a Councel
giving up his Client's cause.


---page break---

PROCEDURE 162. § 53

Trustees to grant warrant of Distress The great Trust to repose is that of sitting in Judgment
to acquit or condemn pass acquittal or condemnation; after condemnation what
follows is of course: & it should seem might as well
be entrusted to persons Commissioners of Turnpikes of this description, as to Commissioners
of Land-Tax, Window Tax & Sewers +
+ Qu. Hawkers &c Salt duties

163. § 53

Quorum to be constant?
Should the Quorum of Trustees consist in every step of the
procedure of the same persons? I should think it
need not as it would be difficult to get 5, allways the same together at once to such
more such a number of which not less fewer than 5 should
be the majority, together at once. In the instance of
the provision for backing Warrants, the part of Judge


---page break---

163 § 53.

PROCEDURE is to shift from one Justice to another — there seems no necessity reason
why precisely the same act as issued a Warrant
of Distress should settle the charges of it when made.
Yet perhaps it might be useful to require that one
or 2 of those who proceeded sat at the taking of the 1st
step in the a prosecution should sit proceed throughout.


---page break---

PROCEDURE 167 § 49

EVIDENCE I think there must be some Millions of people in this
Country, who would be long enough before they would be
able to guess how it should ever have happened, that
their living in a place where a man had done what
a Turnpike Act had bid him not do should make them
not fit to be believed: tho' at the same time not one
of them all, but will acknowledge see a good general foundation
for the rule, that an interested person ought
not to be a witness. — When words cost so little
it is would be a pity to leave the Law a riddle for want
of 2 such little moderate ones as these.

168 § 56

Appeal A person's thinking himself aggrieved, tho' made a
condition of his being permitted to appeal, is one of those
matters facts which like the instigation of the Devil in
a Murder, it is not necessary to bring witnesses to
prove: if nothing was said about either of them, the
Law would not be much the worse.




Identifier: | JB/095/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

procedure turnp. act observations on

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial gr crown motif] [partial lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

30967

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in