JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/095/115/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<head>Observations</head><head>XXIV</head>
<head>Observations</head><head>XXIV</head>
<p>Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect<lb/>obedience they will take up with<!-- blank space underlined with dots --> that <lb/>promise no more than to procure <add>produce</add> a partial one<lb/>  but such a partial one, as the event often <sic>shews</sic> <lb/> to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law.<lb/> </p><p>Whereas, as Mechanics in calculating the <lb/>effect of their Machines, always make [considerable<add>offer their utmost industry</add><lb/><add> <sic>employ'd</sic> in mitigating the effects of</add> <del>allowance <add>abatement</add> on the account</del> of Inertia &amp; others <lb/> to which their work is liable, <add>yet</add> fail not to make<lb/>a  considerable <add>deduction</add> abatement on these accounts, so <lb/>ought Legislators in calculating the force of their <lb/> engines to be persuaded, <note>to lay their account</note> that many more obstacles<lb/>will spring up to their execution than what they<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>can</hi> foresee, much more all they do foresee.<lb/>
 
<head>§ <del><gap/></del> 6.</head>   
<p>Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect
<p>Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu<lb/> shall serve him much &#x2014;<lb/></p>
<lb/>
<p>The following Sections of the original <add>prepared in</add> with the interpolations<lb/><add>that manner that the <gap/> ones</add> <add>here</add> inserted may serve as a commentary <lb/> on this text.<lb/></p><p>  As a proof that so much more than enough becomes<lb/>less I have here inserted all along the additions<lb/> necessary to make it consistent with itself.<lb/></p><pb/>  
obedience they will take up with<!-- blank space underlined with dots --> that  
<lb/>
promise no more than to procure <add>produce</add> a partial one,
<lb/>   
but such a partial one, as the event often <sic>shews</sic>  
<lb/>  
to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law.<lb/> </p>
 
<p>Whereas as Mechanics in calculating the  
<lb/>
effect of their Machines, always <add>often</add> make [considerable<add> their utmost industry</add>
<lb/>
<add> <sic>employ'd</sic> in mitigating the effects of</add> <add>abatement</add><del>allowance on the account</del> of Inertia &amp; others  
<lb/>  
to which their work is liable, <add>yet</add> fail not to make
<lb/>
a  considerable <add>deduction</add> abatement on these accounts, so  
<lb/>
ought Legislators in calculating the force <note>to lay their account</note> of their  
<lb/>  
engines to be persuaded, that many more obstacles
<lb/>
will spring up to their execution than what they
<lb/>  
<hi rend='underline'>can</hi> foresee, much more all they do foresee.</p>
 
<head>§ <del><gap/></del> 6.</head>  
   
<p>Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu
<lb/> shall serve him much &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>The following Sections of the original <add>prepared in</add> with the interpolations
<lb/>
<add>that manner that the real ones</add> <add>here</add> inserted may serve as a commentary  
<lb/>  
on this text.</p>
 
<p>  As a proof that so much more than enough becomes
<lb/>
less I have <del>here</del> inserted all along the additions
<lb/>  
necessary to make it consistent with itself</p>
 
<pb/>  
 
<head><del>The</del> Nugatory<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>  Preamble<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
<head><del>The</del> Nugatory<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi>  Preamble<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi></head>
<p><del>This Statute to</del> <note>Where <hi rend='underline'>something</hi> is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable cal-culation.  But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. </note> It may not be easy to discover &amp; to class every<lb/>distinguishable species of <hi rend='underline'>nugation</hi>: this Statute<lb/> will furnish us with 2.<lb/></p><p>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief<lb/>meant to be prevented.<lb/></p>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Recital in <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> <add>terms of the existence</add> that a certain practice <lb/>is inconvenient &#x2014; suspended <add>or both</add>  
 
by the very act<add> the possibility of an act <add>event</add> and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience</add> </add> <lb/>of prohibition.  <note>Or thus  - 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital that a franchise <lb/>meant to be prevented is mischievous. 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> Recital that it is possible.</note><lb/>
<p><del>This Statute to</del> <note>Where <hi rend='underline'>something</hi> is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable <sic>cal-culation</sic>.  But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. </note> It may not be easy to discover &amp; to class every
<lb/>
distinguishable species of <hi rend='underline'>nugation</hi>: this Statute
<lb/>
will furnish us with 2.</p>
 
<p>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief
<lb/>
meant to be prevented.</p>
 
<p>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Recital in <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> <add>terms</add> <add>of the existence</add> that a certain practice <lb/>
is inconvenient &#x2014; superseded <add>or both</add>  
by the very act <add> the possibility of an act <add>event</add> and its imagined mischief <add>inconvenience</add></add>
<lb/>
of prohibition.  <note>Or these &#x2014; 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Recital that a practice
<lb/>
meant to be prevented is <hi rend='underline'>mischievous</hi>. 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> Recital that it is possible.</note></p>
 
<head>§ 23</head>
<head>§ 23</head>
<p>I cannot very well understand <del>a</del> <del><add>the</add></del> reason <add>there is to be an example</add> why Noblemen's<lb/>& Gentlemen's carriages are to be exempted from<lb/> all these regulations <note>because he <del>has</del> is a Gentleman</note> by being "covered" when <add>there is none for</add> such<lb/> as are open are not exempted.</p>
 
<p>Nor why upon the <add>this</add> condition of covering his carriage<lb/><del>a man</del> is to <del> be <sic>allow'd</sic></del> <add>bear up</add> the Load, with any weight<lb/>drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.<lb/></p>
<p>I cannot very well understand <del>a</del> <del><add>the</add></del> reason <add>there is to be an example</add> why Noblemen's
<p>But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman<lb/><sic>uncover'd</sic> carriage <add>how can it be that .. is a </add>what Exempted man is to <lb/>suppose take upon him to suppose <add>presume</add> from that what is in the mode of it is not<lb/> for the owner's own use</p><pb/>
<lb/>  
<p><add>contemplating it all along</add> according to the plan adopted <add>traced out</add> here and there<lb/>in different parts of the instrument. <add>Statute</add> <del>examples</del><lb/> In this view <del>I have</del> care has been taken not to insert any <!-- blank space underlined with dashes --> for which a  precedent<lb/> is not to be met with<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> in some part of it or other<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi><!-- the superscript 2 is bracketed to the phrase "is not to be met with", and the superscript 1 is bracketed to the phrase "in some part of it or other--></p>
&amp; Gentleman's carriages are to be exempted from
<lb/>  
all these regulations <note>because he <del>has</del> is a Gentleman</note> by being "<hi rend='underline'>covered</hi>" when <add>there is none for</add> such
<lb/>  
as are open. <del>are not exempted</del>.<lb/></p>
 
<p>Nor why <add>a man</add> upon the <add>this</add> condition of covering his carriage
<lb/>
<del>a man</del> is to <del>be <sic>allow'd</sic></del> <add>bear up</add> the Load, with any weight<lb/>drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.<lb/></p>
 
<p>But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman
<lb/>
a <sic>cover'd</sic> carriage which <del>is to</del> <add><del>how can it be thoug</del> <unclear>whatever</unclear> is a </add>Exempted man is to <lb/>suppose <add>presume</add> <note>take upon him to suppose</note> from that what is in the inside of it is not<lb/> for the owner's own use<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
<pb/>
<p> <del>and</del> <add>contemplating it all along</add> according to the plan <del>adopted</del> <add>traced out</add> here and there
<lb/>
in different parts of the instrument. <add>Statute</add> <del><gap/></del>
<lb/>
In this view <del>I have</del> care has been taken not
<lb/>
to insert any <!-- blank space underlined with dashes --> for which a  precedent
<lb/>
is not to be met with<hi rend='superscript'>2</hi> in some part<lb/> of it or other.<hi rend='superscript'>1</hi><!-- the superscript 2 is bracketed to the phrase "is not to be met with", and the superscript 1 is bracketed to the phrase "in some part of it or other--></p>
<pb/>
<note>CARRIERS</note>
<note>CARRIERS</note>
<p> Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the <lb/> respective denominations of <del><gap/></del> carriages to which the <lb/>several parts <add>Articles</add> of this division respectively relate<lb/> It might have been a still  further <add>would have contributed still to</add><lb/> to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent<lb/> to these denominations &#x2014; The Law <add>concerning the owners of</add> of private<lb/> carriages would <add>thus</add> have be<del>deleted text</del> made one Section: that <lb/>concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another a 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi><lb/>That concerning Public Carriages in general a 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>.<lb/></p><pb/><p>And here [it is]we <add><del>we</del> may feel at once</add> see the advantages of a synoptic<lb/>representation: <del>whereby</del> &amp; of a compacted stile,<lb/>without which indeed the framer scarely could<lb/>have place.<lb/></p> <pb/><p>By the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> the multitude of particular propositions<lb/> of which a <add>more</add> general proposition is in<lb/> some way or other predicated, are together<lb/>with it, <add>that general proposition</add> brought under the eye at once:<lb/>By <add>means of</add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>, the eye <add>is enabled to</add> fastens in the instant <note>fastens on the object in the instant</note><lb/> on that  which it is in quest of, no longer<lb/>doomed to the hideous <add>dread?</add> labours of picking out<lb/>one by one <add>the significant</add>  <del>the </del> words <del>significant</del>, from <del>the</del><lb/>insignificant.<lb/></p><p>An expedient, <note>by virtue <add>force</add> of which</note> whereby, the toil of legislation might<lb/>  be reduced, as I much mistake, to a degree <lb/>not easily to be conceived.</p><pb/><head>§ 6c</head><p>It certainly is not every <hi rend='underline'><del>A</del>act</hi><add>provision</add<add>><hi rend='underline'>purpose</hi></add> <add>effect</add> of a <add>repealed</add> <del>Statute</del> repealed<lb/> that is <gap/> by the <add>repealing</add> Statute:  all acts transacted<lb/>under it remain ...: with respect to them<lb/>it is considered as having spent itself &amp; having<lb/>had its force.<lb/></p><p>Suppose a temporary Act to repeal another<lb/> Act: would the latter be considered as revived<lb/> by the expiration of the former?<lb/></p><pb/>
 
<p> Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the  
<lb/>  
respective denominations of <del>persons</del> <add>carriages</add> to which the  
<lb/>
several parts <add>Articles</add> of this division respectively relate
<lb/>  
It <add>would have contributed still further to perspicuity</add> might have been a still  further <add><unclear>perpetual</unclear></add> improvement
<lb/>  
to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent
<lb/>  
to their denominations &#x2014; The Law <add>concerning the owners of</add> of private
<lb/>  
carriages would <add>thus</add> have <del>be</del> made one Section: that
<lb/>
concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another <add>a 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi></add>
<lb/>
That concerning Public Carriages in general, a 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>.<lb/></p>
 
 
<p>And here [it is] we <add> may feel at once</add> see the advantages of a synoptic
<lb/>
representation: <del>whereby</del> &amp; of a compacted stile,
<lb/>
without which indeed the former scarely could<lb/>have place.<lb/></p>
<pb/>
 
<p>By the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> the multitude of particular propositions
<lb/>  
of which a <add>more</add> general proposition is in
<lb/>  
some way or other predicated, are together
<lb/>
with it, <add>that general proposition</add> brought under the eye at once:
<lb/>
By <add>means of</add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>, the eye <add>is enabled to</add> fastens in the instant <note>fastens on the object in the instant</note>
<lb/>  
on that  which it is in quest of, no longer
<lb/>
doomed to the hideous <add>drudgery</add> labors of picking out
<lb/>
one by one <add>the significant</add>  <del>the </del> words <del>significant</del>, from <del>the</del>
<lb/>
insignificant.<lb/></p>
 
<p>An expedient, <note>by virtue <add>force</add> of which</note> whereby, the toil of legislation might
<lb/>  be reduced, or I much mistake, to a degree  
<lb/>
not easily to be conceived.<lb/></p>
 
<head>§ 6c.</head>
 
<p>It certainly is not every <hi rend='underline'><del>A</del>act</hi><add>function <add><hi rend='underline'>purpose</hi></add> <add>effect</add></add>  of a <add>repealed</add> <del>Statute</del> repealed
<lb/>  
that is rescinded by the <add>repealing</add> Statute:  all acts transacted
<lb/>
under it remain intact: with respect to them
<lb/>
it is considered as having spent itself &amp; having
<lb/>
had <sic>it's</sic> force.<lb/></p>
 
<p>Suppose a temporary Act to repeal another
<lb/>  
Act: would the latter be considered as revived
<lb/>  
by the expiration of the former?<lb/></p>




Line 37: Line 190:
    
    
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


ObservationsXXIV

Despairing (as with some reason they may) of a perfect
obedience they will take up with that
promise no more than to procure produce a partial one,
but such a partial one, as the event often shews
to be insufficient to answer the purposes of the Law.

Whereas as Mechanics in calculating the
effect of their Machines, always often make [considerable their utmost industry
employ'd in mitigating the effects of abatementallowance on the account of Inertia & others
to which their work is liable, yet fail not to make
a considerable deduction abatement on these accounts, so
ought Legislators in calculating the force to lay their account of their
engines to be persuaded, that many more obstacles
will spring up to their execution than what they
can foresee, much more all they do foresee.

§ 6.

Ahab hath served Baal a little: but Jehu
shall serve him much —

The following Sections of the original prepared in with the interpolations
that manner that the real ones here inserted may serve as a commentary
on this text.

As a proof that so much more than enough becomes
less I have here inserted all along the additions
necessary to make it consistent with itself


---page break---

The Nugatory2 Preamble1

This Statute to Where something is to be said, the ways of saying it may come under tolerable cal-culation. But the ways of saying nothing at all are infinite. It may not be easy to discover & to class every
distinguishable species of nugation: this Statute
will furnish us with 2.

1st Recital of the possibility of an obvious mischief
meant to be prevented.

2d Recital in general terms of the existence that a certain practice
is inconvenient — superseded or both by the very act the possibility of an act <add>event and its imagined mischief inconvenience</add>
of prohibition. Or these — 1st Recital that a practice
meant to be prevented is mischievous. 2nd Recital that it is possible.

§ 23

I cannot very well understand a the reason there is to be an example why Noblemen's
& Gentleman's carriages are to be exempted from
all these regulations because he has is a Gentleman by being "covered" when there is none for such
as are open. are not exempted.

Nor why a man upon the this condition of covering his carriage
a man is to be allow'd bear up the Load, with any weight
drawn by any number of horses he thinks proper.

But if he assumes those insignia of a Gentleman
a cover'd carriage which is to how can it be thoug whatever is a Exempted man is to
suppose presume take upon him to suppose from that what is in the inside of it is not
for the owner's own use


---page break---

and contemplating it all along according to the plan adopted traced out here and there
in different parts of the instrument. Statute
In this view I have care has been taken not
to insert any for which a precedent
is not to be met with2 in some part
of it or other.1


---page break---

CARRIERS

Had I been able to satisfy myself concerning the
respective denominations of persons carriages to which the
several parts Articles of this division respectively relate
It would have contributed still further to perspicuity might have been a still further perpetual improvement
to have broken it into subdivisions corresponent
to their denominations — The Law concerning the owners of of private
carriages would thus have be made one Section: that
concerning carriages used only in Husbandry another a 2d
That concerning Public Carriages in general, a 3d.


And here [it is] we may feel at once see the advantages of a synoptic
representation: whereby & of a compacted stile,
without which indeed the former scarely could
have place.


---page break---

By the 1st the multitude of particular propositions
of which a more general proposition is in
some way or other predicated, are together
with it, that general proposition brought under the eye at once:
By means of the 2d, the eye is enabled to fastens in the instant fastens on the object in the instant
on that which it is in quest of, no longer
doomed to the hideous drudgery labors of picking out
one by one the significant the words significant, from the
insignificant.

An expedient, by virtue force of which whereby, the toil of legislation might
be reduced, or I much mistake, to a degree
not easily to be conceived.

§ 6c.

It certainly is not every Aactfunction <add>purpose effect</add> of a repealed Statute repealed
that is rescinded by the repealing Statute: all acts transacted
under it remain intact: with respect to them
it is considered as having spent itself & having
had it's force.

Suppose a temporary Act to repeal another
Act: would the latter be considered as revived
by the expiration of the former?











Identifier: | JB/095/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

095

Main Headings

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

observations xxiv

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in