JB/096/001/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/001/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/001/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Section I</head>


<head><del>The author's a</del> <add>A</add>ccount of Law<add>s</add>in<lb/> general</head>
<head>1</head>
 
<head>Section 1</head>
 
<head><del>The Author's a</del> <add>A</add>ccount of Law<add>s</add>in general.</head>
 
<p>"Law, in general, / says our Author / is a <note>Vol:1. P. 38</note><lb/>
"rule of action, which is prescribed by some <lb/>
"superior, and which the inferior is bound to<lb/>
"obey."</p>
 
<p>Having <del><hi rend='underline'>given us this special sense of</hi> the</del> <add>thus defined what he means by the term</add>
<lb/>
<add><del>Now when a man sets out by defining any thing term, that is by telling us, that whenever I us</del></add>
<lb/>
<del>word</del> law, <del><hi rend='underline'>it was natural</hi></del> <add>we had <del>ve</del> a right</add> to expect, that he
<lb/>
<del><hi rend='underline'>would</hi></del> <add>should</add> use it in this sense, and in this sense
<lb/>
<add>For what <del>is it to</del> <add>does a man do when he</add> defines a <del>word</del> <add>term</add>? <del>but to</del> he tells <del>the</del> his reader, "whenever I</add>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>only</hi> throughout the rest of his discourse. <del>What</del>
<lb/>
<add>"use <del>such a</del> <add>this</add> term I mean to excite in your mind such &amp; such ideas."
If during the course of his argument he makes use of this same term to</add>
<lb/>
<del>then must be the surprise of the reader, when</del>
<lb/>
<add><del>raise</del> <add>excite very different</add> ideas <del>very different from those, of which he had at the outset <add>he</add> declared</del>
<del>it the sign</del>, he may be playing at cross-purposes, but he must not pretend</add>
<lb/>
<del>in the very next line he is told, that "this word</del>
<lb/>
<add>to be reasoning &#x2014; He is like the <del>reasoner</del> <add>man of D<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi></add> <del>supposed by</del> Brown: <note>Essay on Charact. Sec. v.</note> <del>who</del> <add>he</add>
assures us that he has a wind mill which lays eggs, &amp; breeds young</add>
<lb/>
<del>is <sic>indiscrinately</sic> applied to all kinds of action,</del>
<lb/>
<add>ones: by a wind mill <del>ones:</del> &#x2014; meaning <del>by a wind mill</del> <add>all the while</add> a  goose or a Turkey.</add>
<lb/>
<del>whether animate, or inanimate.</del>
<lb/>
<del>Let us see now</del> <add>I am afraid</add> <del><add>whether</add></del> <del>how far</del> our learned Judge <del>has not</del> <add>is</add> <del>rational</del> now &amp; then <add>apt to</add> put <add>windmills</add>
</p>


<p>"Law, in general, / says our Author / is a <note>Vol:1.P. 30</note><lb/>
rule of action, which is prescribed by some <lb/>
superior, and which the inferior is bound to<lb/>
obey."</p>


<p>Having <del><hi rend='underline'>given us this special sense of the</hi></del><hi rend='superscript'><add>thus defined what he means by the term</add></hi><lb/><note><del>Now when a man sets<lb/>out by defining any thing</del></note><del> word</del> law,<hi rend='superscript'><del>term, that is by telling us, that whenever Jus</del></hi> <del><hi rend='underline'>it was natural</hi></del><hi rend='superscript'><add>we had <del>e</del> a right</add></hi> to expect, that he<lb/><del><hi rend='underline'>would</hi></del><hi rend='superscript'><add>should</add></hi> use it in this sense, and in this sense<lb/><hi rend='underline'>only</hi><hi rend='superscript'><add>For what <del>is it to</del><hi rend='superscript'><add>does a man do when he</add></hi> defines a word? throughout the rest of his discourse<add>.</add> <del>What</del><lb/>
<unclear>use</unclear> <del>such a</del> <add>this</add> term I mean to excite in your mind such & such ideas."<lb/>
If during the course of his argument he makes use of this same term to<lb/>
<del>raise</del> <add>excite very different</add> ideas <del>very different from those of which he had at the outset <head>he</head> declared<lb/>
it the <unclear>sign</unclear></del>, he may be playing at cross-purposes, but he may not pre<lb/>
<del>in the very next line he is told that "this word</del><lb/>
tend to be reasoning &#x2014; He is like the <del>reasoner</del> <add>man of Dr</add> <del>supposed by</del> Brown, <del>who</del> <add>he</add><lb/>
assures us that he has a wind mill which lays eggs, &amp; breeds young<lb/>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1

Section 1

The Author's a Account of Lawsin general.

"Law, in general, / says our Author / is a Vol:1. P. 38
"rule of action, which is prescribed by some
"superior, and which the inferior is bound to
"obey."

Having given us this special sense of the thus defined what he means by the term
Now when a man sets out by defining any thing term, that is by telling us, that whenever I us
word law, it was natural we had ve a right to expect, that he
would should use it in this sense, and in this sense
For what is it to <add>does a man do when he defines a word term? but to he tells the his reader, "whenever I</add>
only throughout the rest of his discourse. What
"use such a <add>this term I mean to excite in your mind such & such ideas." If during the course of his argument he makes use of this same term to</add>
then must be the surprise of the reader, when
raise <add>excite very different ideas very different from those, of which he had at the outset he declared it the sign, he may be playing at cross-purposes, but he must not pretend</add>
in the very next line he is told, that "this word
to be reasoning — He is like the reasoner <add>man of Dr supposed by Brown: Essay on Charact. Sec. v. who he assures us that he has a wind mill which lays eggs, & breeds young</add>
is indiscrinately applied to all kinds of action,
ones: by a wind mill ones: — meaning by a wind mill <add>all the while a goose or a Turkey.</add>
whether animate, or inanimate.
Let us see now I am afraid whether how far our learned Judge has not is rational now & then apt to put windmills



Identifier: | JB/096/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

section i / account of laws in general

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 f1 / c2 / c3 / c4

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31005

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in