JB/096/004/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

It is sometimes a useful & oftenner still an amusing
eng object to trace the errors of a great man to their
"He must necessarily be subject to the
source. — Whence <add>How came our Author to fall into this</add> "will of his Creator:" — "He must inevitably
confusion of ideas? How could he descant so gravely on
"take the will of him, on whom he depends,
the action of inactive matter? On the obligation of
"as the rule of his conduct:"—" It is necessary
unconscious Being? On acts of superiority exercised &
"that he should in all points conform to
of inferiority allowed by one & the same Being over
"his maker's will." If this representation
himself? On the free agency of a Being tied down by
be true, what occasion for a system of laws?
absolute necessity?— <add>There was one thing our Author could do: that is,Gentle reader! He could read.—
read. There is another thing he could not do: this is, extract the spirit of what he
</add> To what purpose does the learned professor
read! It is with this commentator, as with so many other Commentators: his appetite
is better than his Digestion. But the powers of digestion do not always keep pace
take so much pains to prove the a conformity with the voracity of the appetite:
which does not exist
between the laws of England, and the laws
[Our author had pored over] Montesquieu.— And <add>he had read. Montesquieu
had written upon Laws in general in a manner almost as unintelligible, tho' not
quite so inconsistent. The errors of Montesquieu were the errors of an original genius
</add> of God. And, that conformity supposed, why
struggling under the heap of confusion accumulated by his predecessors. A great part
of this heap he has contributed to remove. The tasks of Montesquieu are daunting to
our Author.
[there] he had found as follows:— "Tous les etesont Esp. des Loix. L.1 C.l
is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to
"leurs loix: la Divinite a ses loix: — le monde materiele ses
these laws? this is all labor lost, if man is
"loix: les intelligences superieur a l'homme ont leurs
necessitated to obey the laws of his maker if Creator
"loix, les betes ont leurs loix: l'homme a ses loix." —
Man <add>in And</add>

3) 7)

Identifier: \| JB/096/004/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	004	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c7 / c8 / c9 / c10
Penner	168	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	31008
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-It is sometimes a useful &amp; <unclear>offenner</unclear> still an amassing <del>eng</del> object to have the errors of a great man to their<lb/>
-"He must necessarily be subject to the<lb/>
-sources. &#x2014; <del>Whence</del> How <unclear>came</unclear> our Author to fall into this<lb/>
-"will of his Creator:"&#x2014; "He must inevitably<lb/>
-confusion of ideas?  How could he descant so gravely on <lb/>
-"take the will of him, on whom he depends,<lb/>
- the <unclear>action</unclear> of inactive matter? On the obligation of<lb/>
-"as the rule of his conduct:"&#x2014;"<unclear>If</unclear> is necessary<lb/>
-unconscious Being?  On acts of superiority exercised &amp; <lb/>
-"that he should in all points conform to<lb/>
-of inferiority allowed by one &amp; the same Being over <lb/>
-"his maker's will." <unclear>If</unclear>this representation<lb/>
-himself?  On the <unclear>face</unclear> agency of a Being tied down by<lb/>
-be true, what occasion for a system of laws?<lb/> There was one thing our Author could do: that is,<lb/>
-absolute mere pity?&#x2014; Gentle reader! He <unclear>coned</unclear> read.&#x2014; <lb/>
-<hi rend='underline'>read.</hi> There is another thing he could not do: this is extract the spirit of what he <lb/> To what purpose does the learned <sic>profefsor</sic><lb/> read! If in with this commentator, as with so many other Commentators: his ap-<lb/>
-But the powers of digestion do not always keep pace<lb/>
--petite is better than his Digestion.<lb/> Take so much pains to prove <hi rend='superscript'>a</hi> conformity<lb/>
-with the voracity of the appetite?<lb/>
-which does not exist<lb/>
-between the laws of England, and the laws<lb/> he had read. Montesquieu
-[Our author had <unclear>pored</unclear> over] Montesquieu.&#x2014; And <lb/>
-And written upon laws in general in a manner almost as <unclear>unintelligible</unclear>, the not <gap/> to <unclear>insignificant</unclear>. The <unclear>form</unclear> of Montesquieu were the errors of an original genius <unclear>elegantly</unclear> under the ways of <gap/> decency by his <gap/><gap/>! A great part of this <unclear>may</unclear> he has <unclear>confronted</unclear> to remain.  The marks of Montesquieu are <unclear><sic>downties</sic></unclear> in our Author.<lb/>
-[There] he had <unclear><sic>fonndas</sic></unclear> follows:&#x2014; <foreign>"Tous les eteront E.p. du font I.l.C.l</foreign><lb/>
-is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to<lb/>
-<foreign>"Leurs loix: la Divinite a ses loux:&#x2014;le monde materiele a ses</foreign><lb/>
-these laws? This is all labor cost if <gap/> an is<lb/>
-"lois: les intelligences superieux a l'homme ont leurs<lb/>
-necessitated to obey the laws of his Creator
-"loix, les betes ont leurs loix: l'homme a ses loix."&#x2014;<lb/>
-in<lb/>
-and<lb/>
-)<lb/>
-)
+<p>
+<add> It is sometimes a useful &amp; oftenner still an amusing<lb/>
+<del>eng</del> object to trace the errors of a great man to their<lb/>
+</add>
+"He must necessarily be subject to the
+<lb/>
+<add>source. &#x2014; <del>Whence</del> <add>How</add> came our Author to fall into this</add>
+"will of his Creator:" &#x2014; "He must inevitably
+<lb/>
+<add>confusion of ideas?  How could he descant so gravely on <lb/></add>
+"take the will of him, on whom he depends,
+<lb/>
+<add>the action of inactive matter? On the obligation of<lb/></add>
+"as the rule of his conduct:"&#x2014;" It is necessary
+<lb/>
+<add>unconscious Being?  On acts of superiority exercised &amp; <lb/></add>
+"that he should in all points conform to
+<lb/>
+<add>of inferiority allowed by one &amp; the same Being over <lb/></add>
+"his maker's will." If this representation
+<lb/>
+<add>himself?  On the free agency of a Being tied down by<lb/></add>
+be true, what occasion for a system of laws?
+<lb/>
+<add>absolute necessity?&#x2014; <add>There was one thing our
+Author could do: that is,</add>Gentle reader! He could read.&#x2014;<lb/>
+<hi rend='underline'>read.</hi> There is another thing he could not do: this is, extract the spirit of what he <lb/>
+</add>
+To what purpose does the learned professor
+<lb/>
+<add>read! It is with this commentator, as with so many other Commentators: his appetite<lb/>
+is better than his Digestion. But the powers of digestion do not always keep pace<lb/>
+</add>
+take so much pains to prove <del>the</del> <add>a</add> conformity
+<add>with the voracity of the appetite: </add>
+<lb/>
+<add>which does not exist</add>
+<lb/>
+between the laws of England, and the laws
+<lb/>
+<add>[Our author had pored over] Montesquieu.&#x2014; And <add>he had read. Montesquieu</add><lb/>
+had written upon Laws in general in a manner almost as unintelligible, <sic>tho'</sic> not<lb/>
+quite so inconsistent. The errors of Montesquieu were the errors of an original genius <lb/>
+</add>
+of God. And, that conformity supposed, why
+<lb/>
+<add>struggling under the heap of confusion accumulated by his predecessors. A great part<lb/>
+of this heap he has contributed to remove.  The tasks of Montesquieu are daunting to<lb/>
+our Author.<lb/>
+[there] he had found as follows:&#x2014; <foreign>"Tous les etesont Esp. des Loix. L.1 C.l</foreign><lb/>
+</add>
+is he so eloquent in enforcing obedience to
+<lb/>
+<add><foreign>"leurs loix: la Divinite a ses loix: &#x2014; le monde materiele ses</foreign><lb/></add>
+these laws? this is all <sic>labor</sic> lost, if man is
+<lb/>
+<add><foreign>"loix: les intelligences superieur a l'homme ont leurs</foreign><lb/></add>
+necessitated to obey the laws of his <del>maker if</del> Creator
+<lb/>
+<add><foreign>"loix, les betes ont leurs loix: l'homme a ses loix."</foreign> &#x2014;</add><lb/>
+<add><del>Man</del> <add>in</add> <add>And</add></add>
+</p>
+<head>3)  7)</head>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/096/004/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search