★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
< | <pb/> | ||
<p> | |||
<add>not necessarily included; & supposing the definition to</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
matter: on the obligation of unconscious | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add>have been just (which it is not) supposing it not to</add><lb/> | |||
being: on acts of superiority exercised, and | being: on acts of superiority exercised, and | ||
<add>have | <lb/> | ||
<add>have mistaken the foundation of Law, for <del>the</del></add><lb/> | |||
inferiority allowed, by one, and the same | inferiority allowed, by one, and the same | ||
<add>have | <lb/> | ||
<add>the Law itself what followed would have been</add><lb/> | |||
being to himself? On the free agency of a | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add>consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt</add><lb/> | |||
being, who is confined by absolute necessity? | |||
<lb/> | |||
<add> | |||
indeed to tack these inferences to our Author's definition <lb/> | |||
of Law. — To make God for instance <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note>+ Vol. 1 p. 39</note> <hi rend='underline'>prescribe</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend='underline'>Laws</hi> to himself: that is, be at once <add><hi rend='underline'>his own</hi></add> Superior<lb/> | |||
& Inferior: Master & Man: To make Stones feel<lb/> | |||
obligation; or to <del>tie</del> make man choose without choice:<lb/> | |||
will without volition.<lb/></add></p> | |||
<p>The professed design of <del>the Commentaries</del> <add>our Author</add> is <add>to</add> <hi rend='underline'>methodise</hi><lb/> | |||
<add>the | & <hi rend='underline'>explain</hi>" a science which had been hitherto <del>been</del> but<lb/> | ||
little cultivated. — <foreign>Quod dedit principium adveniens</foreign>?<lb/> | |||
I shall leave the reader to answer this question. <del>The</del> <lb/> <del>Ancients too were fond of talking of</del> <add>Horace too <del>was</del> of old talked much about</add> <add>the<del>ir</del></add> <hi rend='underline'><foreign>lucidus ordo</foreign></hi>.<lb/> | |||
And yet it was reserved to a great Genius <del>of the present</del> <add>of our own to discover</add><lb/> | |||
<del>Age to discover,</del> <add>1800 years afterwards</add> that there was any order at all, in <lb/> | |||
the very book where <del>this phrase occurs. <gap/> The</del> <add>he recommends it. Perhaps our learned</add><lb/> | |||
Commentator may one day meet with as able a friend.<lb/> | |||
<del>At <gap/></del> He seems to be a great Admirer of the Ancients <del><add>truth</add></del><lb/> <add>and</add></p> | |||
<head>9</head> | |||
< | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
---page break---
not necessarily included; & supposing the definition to
matter: on the obligation of unconscious
have been just (which it is not) supposing it not to
being: on acts of superiority exercised, and
have mistaken the foundation of Law, for the
inferiority allowed, by one, and the same
the Law itself what followed would have been
being to himself? On the free agency of a
consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt
being, who is confined by absolute necessity?
indeed to tack these inferences to our Author's definition
of Law. — To make God for instance + + Vol. 1 p. 39 prescribe
Laws to himself: that is, be at once <add>his own Superior
& Inferior: Master & Man: To make Stones feel
obligation; or to tie make man choose without choice:
will without volition.
</add>
The professed design of the Commentaries our Author is to methodise
& explain" a science which had been hitherto been but
little cultivated. — Quod dedit principium adveniens?
I shall leave the reader to answer this question. The
Ancients too were fond of talking of Horace too was of old talked much about their lucidus ordo.
And yet it was reserved to a great Genius of the present of our own to discover
Age to discover, 1800 years afterwards that there was any order at all, in
the very book where this phrase occurs. The he recommends it. Perhaps our learned
Commentator may one day meet with as able a friend.
At He seems to be a great Admirer of the Ancients truth
and
9
|
Identifier: | JB/096/004/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
|
004 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
c7 / c8 / c9 / c10 |
||
|
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
|
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31008 |
||
