JB/096/032/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/032/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/096/032/001" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 32: Line 32:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


To be copied "in consequence. For in this case, there
"are two parties: One represented, by the by the
"Sovereign, who insists upon the violation
"of the contract; and the other is the person
"accused, who denies it. It is necessary
"then, that there should be a third person to
"decide this contest; that is to say, a judge, or
"magistrate, from whose determination there
"should be no appeal; and this determination and this determination
should consist of a simple affirmation should consist of a simple affirmation or,
or negation of fact" negation of fact.

[ThereIt should seem almost impossible
that any case can be given where this extraordinary

80




Identifier: | JB/096/032/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c80 / c81 / c82 / c83

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31036

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in