JB/096/035/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

To be copied

land had not declared it an evil, it never
could be proved an Evil.+ + Yes it could: or it never sho ought to have forbidden. It lessen'd the national stand of riches, & consequently of strength. it encreased that of a rival nation . So at least it was supposed to do. It follows then,
upon our Author's Principles, that HI
quietly submit to the Penalty, I am a
very moral man, because I am not guilty
of any Offence, which is malum in
se: and I and a very good Citizen, for I
embrace one of the Alternatives proposed by
the law: nay, it follows, that till I am
found out, though I submit to no penalty,
I am still a very moral man, and
a very good Citizen too:—: for the law does not
require me to submit to any penalty till

92)

Identifier: \| JB/096/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	035	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c92 / c93 / c94 / c95
Penner	168	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	31039
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
-and had not declared it our evil, if never<lb/>
+<note><hi rend='underline'>To be copied</hi></note><!-- written in red ink -->
-could be proved an evil. <add>yes it could; or is <lb/>never <unclear>to</unclear>ought to <lb/>have forbidden. I <gap/><lb/><gap/><lb/><gap/>quality of thought.<lb/><gap/>that of<lb/> a novel notion. <gap/>least it was <gap/><lb/>to do.</add> It follows then,<lb/> upon ur Author's principles, that <unclear>of</unclear> I <lb/> quietly submit to the penaly, I am a <lb/>very moral man, because I am not guil<lb/>ty of any offence, which is <unclear>malium in<lb/>se;</unclear> and I and a very good but iren, for of<lb/> embrace <add>one</add> of the alternatives proposed by<lb/> the law: nay, it follows, that till I am<lb/> found out, though I submit to no penal<lb/>ty, I am still a very moral man, and<lb/> a very good biteren <add>to;</add>for the law does not<lb/>require me to submit to any penalty<lb/>till<lb/><pb/>
+<p>land had not declared it an evil, it never
+<lb/>
+could be proved an Evil.<hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>  Yes it could: or it never <del>sho</del> ought to have forbidden. It <sic>lessen'd</sic> the national <unclear>stand</unclear> of riches, &amp; consequently of strength.  it <sic>encreased</sic> that of a rival nation . So at least it was supposed to do.</note>  It follows then,
+<lb/>
+upon our Author's Principles, that <unclear>H<hi rend='superscript'>I</hi></unclear>
+<lb/>
+quietly submit to the Penalty, I am a
+<lb/>
+very moral man, because I am not guilty
+<lb/>
+of any Offence, which is <!-- foreign text checked: http://search.avg.com/?d=4dee1342&i=23&tp=chrome&q=malum+in+se+definition&lng=en-GB&nt=1 --><foreign>malum in
+<lb/>
+se:</foreign> and I and a very good Citizen, for I
+<lb/>
+embrace <add>one</add> of the Alternatives proposed by
+<lb/>
+the law: nay, it follows, that till I am
+<lb/>
+found out, though I submit to no penalty,
+<lb/>
+I am still a very moral man, and
+<lb/>
+a very good Citizen <add>too:&#x2014;</add>: for the law does not
+<lb/>
+require me to submit to any penalty <add>till</add><lb/></p>
+<head>92)</head><!-- written in red ink -->
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/096/035/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search