JB/096/092/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/092/001: Difference between revisions

RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/092/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/092/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->




51 SERMO


<note>Definitiones Stat. Disc. authentica</note> Definitiones authoritativae sunto:
<p><note>Definitiones Stat. Disc. authentica</note> 51 SERMO<lb/>
Definitiones authoritativæ sunto:</p>


52<lb/>
<p><note>Definitiones Stat. Disc.</note> 52.<lb/>
<note>Definitiones Stat. Disc</note>. <p>Definitiones eodem contincatur instrumento
Definitio<del>nes</del> eodem contincatur instrumento<lb/>
quo Definitum: <del>aut</del><add> <del>aut</del> <lb/><unclear>saltum</unclear</add>> in alio, si<lb/>
quo Definitum: <del>aut</del><add> <del>aut</del> saltum</add> in alio, si<lb/>
in alio, quod aeque sit prae manibus.</p>
in alio, quod æque sit præ manibus.</p>


53.<lb/>
<!-- the previous two paragraphs are joined by a bracket like this: { -->
<p> Codex <del>Particularis</del>Personalis ad ultimam<lb/>
singulieritatem <gap/> reductum tam reductio<lb/>
est <gap/> <gap/>.</p>


54.<lb/>
<p><note>Codices Personales Stat.</note> 53.<lb/>
<note>Divisiones Cod. Homo -by pokimeni Divi- Relationes Personae ad rem.</note>
Codex <del>Particularis</del>Personalis ad ultimam<lb/>
<p>. . . . sunt modi quibus <gap/> <del><add><gap/></add></del><lb/>
simplicitatem <del><gap/></del> <del>reductum</del> <add>tam <gap/> reducta</add><lb/>
rei interesse <add>mobilis <gap/></add>. Ut<add> <unclear>(alter</unclear></add> Fabricator&#x2014; --<lb/>
est <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <del><unclear>cum</unclear></del> </p>
 
<!-- a broken line connects the previous sentence with paragraph 35*, apparently its English translation -->
 
<p><note>Divisiones Cod. Homo-hypokimeni Divi- Relationes Personae ad rem.</note> 54.<lb/>
. . . . sunt modi quibus <gap/> <del><add>potest</add></del><lb/>
potest rei interesse <add>mobilis <gap/></add>. Ut<add> Cultor</add> Fabricator&#x2014; --<lb/>
Importator, <del><gap/></del><add> Venditor</add> , Vector, Exportator<add> Emptor</add><lb/>
Importator, <del><gap/></del><add> Venditor</add> , Vector, Exportator<add> Emptor</add><lb/>
Possessor, consumptor &#x2014; Contractor ei<lb/>
Possessor, consumptor &#x2014; Contractor si<lb/>
Contractus in ei re differt a contractibus<lb/>
Contractus in ei re differt a contractibus<lb/>
in aliis. Collector, exportationis causa.v. 58.</p>
in aliis. Collector, exportationis causâ. v. 58. <!-- "v. 58" in lighter ink --></p>


55.
 
<p><note>Stat. <gap/> quibus <gap/> servandi negotium<unclear> incumbit</unclear></note>
<note>Schemata Utilitates.</note>
55.<lb/>
Pangitur Codex <add>Legum</add> secundum Schema Homo<lb/>
Pangitur Codex <add>Legum</add> secundum Schema Homo<lb/>
prosopon, subditerum civium gratia: Homo-by-<lb/>
prosopon, subditerum <add>civium</add> gratiâ: Homo-hypokimenon,<lb/>
pokimenon, latorum. <add>quibus condendi &amp; exequendi</add> &amp; executorum.  
 
<pb/>
 
latorum. <add>quibus condendi &amp; exequendi</add> &amp; executorum.  
<!-- this paragraph lies on both sides of a page break --></p>
 
<p><note>Stat.</note>
 
<note>Schemata.</note>
56<lb/>
Si <del>utroque</del> alterutrum tantum adoptere<lb/>
placetet, <add>edi</add> præstat <add>ad</add> Homo<del> hypokeminon</del> <add>prosopos</add> Homo
hypokimeno:<lb/>
quia facilius est peritis<lb/>
Homo prosopa: <del><gap/></del> debita in unum Homo-hypokimenon<lb/>
comparare, quam imperitus<lb/>
Homo-hyperkimenon in debita<lb/>
Homo prosopa dividere.</p>
 
 
<p><note>Subjecta Codicum</note> 57
<del>Subjectum</del> est <note>Stat.
Res fiunt subjecta legum <gap/> voluptati præbendae aut doleri arcendo inserviunt: neque aliter inde subjectum legis est</note> vel principales vel accessi<gap/>:<lb/>
Principale [est id quod voluptati <add>usui humano</add><lb/>
præbendæ aut doleri arcendo] immediati<lb/>
<del>sub</del><add>in</add>venit: accessendum, quod non nisi per<lb/>
mediaterium alicujus principalis.</p>
 
<p>
<note><del>Subjecta</del> Divisiones Codicum</note>
<note>Stæt.</note> 58.
Divisiones Codices <add>unde hausi agitur</add> Homo-hypokimini <del>ab his</del> <lb/>
hic sunt fontes. 1 Diversitatis specificae <note>
formae naturalia</note> <add>ipso</add> in subjecto<lb/>
principali, <gap/> tametsi <add>uno aliquo</add> vocabulo generico<lb/>
comprehensæ. <del>3</del>2. Diversitas <del><unclear>etiam</unclear></del> <add>intis actus</add> potentiae<lb/>
ed circa exertos (cos scilicit quos &#x2014; armæ<add> <gap/></add><lb/>
 
<note>
operationes</note></p>
 
<head>COMPOS. System of Codes. Heads with references to the Sheets where BR V <!-- letters BR V are enclosed in boxes --> treated of.</head>
 
 
 
<pb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
<p><note>Codices Personales</note>35*<lb/>
A particular personal Code is <del>not</del> reduced to<lb/>
<sic>it's</sic> ultimate term <add>stage</add> of simplicity, when<lb/>
<del>there is no</del> <del><add>all <sic>it's</sic></add></del> <del>Article in it such, as that</del><lb/>
there is no person (designable by any<lb/>
general term of description) concerned<lb/>
as the primary object of any one  <add>of <sic>it's</sic> policies</add> that<lb/>
is not concerned also as the primary<lb/>
object of all the rest. v. No <del><gap/></del> 53.</p>
 
<p>Tis only by general <add>terms</add> descriptions that Laws<lb/>
can reach uncertain [&amp; changing] Individuals</p>
 
<pb/>
<p>
<note>Subjecta</note> 58.
Juris submittere plauserit,) qui rursus  <del><gap/></del> <add>vel</add><lb/>
ejusdem possunt esse personæ vel divisionem; <lb/>
<del>4</del> 3, Diversitas subjectorum <del><add> <add>eidem</add> <gap/></add></del> <add><gap/></add> accessariorum.<lb/>
&#x2014; <del>2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi></del>.<!-- presumably, this should be "4", though I don't see it... --> Diversitas formæ <lb/>superinductæ. 5. Diversitas loci legalis <add>ditionis legis</add>. 6. Diversitas<lb/>
temporis legalis. <add>legis.</add> v. 54.<lb/></p> <!-- v. 54 in lighter ink -->
 
<p><note>Stat. Legem possidere, quid&#x2014;</note> 59. 9. 10.<lb/>
Effectus <add>Virtus</add> <add><gap/></add> Legis pendit inter alia a possessione <lb/>
vel conceptu quam mens habet ejusdem<lb/>
Legis in <del><add><unclear> an</unclear></add>
</del> possessio sive conceptus <del><unclear>possunt</unclear></del> <add>an subvit</add><lb/>
vel <add><del><unclear>an</unclear></del> <add>respectu</add> datae legis</add> minus <add>est</add> vel magis <unclear>probabiles.</unclear></p>
<p>
<note>Stat.</note>
<note>Brevitas.</note>
60 9.10.<lb/><!-- 9. 10. in lighter ink -->
Quodlibet vocabulum adjutorium (in legibus <lb/>
<gap/> in aliis scriptis quibuslibet) manuit<lb/>
cum probabilitatem respectu Codices Homo-prosopae:<lb/>
cum latius, <unclear>tum</unclear> &amp; singularum<lb/>
fortium; quæ in intellectu<add> intellectu separatitium.</add> possunt separari<lb/>
alitis &#x2014; Quo major est vocabularum summa in<lb/>
codice, eo minor est probabilitas de quos agitur<lb/>
respectu tunc totius <gap/> &amp; dicti alicujus partis.<lb/>
adioque agitur boni quod in lege expectatur.</p>
<!-- this entire paragraph crossed out with big diagonal strokes -->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Line 38: Line 145:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


Definitiones Stat. Disc. authentica 51 SERMO
Definitiones authoritativæ sunto:

Definitiones Stat. Disc. 52.
Definitiones eodem contincatur instrumento
quo Definitum: aut aut saltum in alio, si
in alio, quod æque sit præ manibus.


Codices Personales Stat. 53.
Codex ParticularisPersonalis ad ultimam
simplicitatem reductum tam reducta
est cum


Divisiones Cod. Homo-hypokimeni Divi- Relationes Personae ad rem. 54.
. . . . sunt modi quibus potest
potest rei interesse mobilis . Ut Cultor Fabricator— --
Importator, Venditor , Vector, Exportator Emptor
Possessor, consumptor — Contractor si
Contractus in ei re differt a contractibus
in aliis. Collector, exportationis causâ. v. 58.


Stat. quibus servandi negotium incumbit Schemata Utilitates. 55.
Pangitur Codex Legum secundum Schema Homo
prosopon, subditerum civium gratiâ: Homo-hypokimenon,

---page break---
latorum. quibus condendi & exequendi & executorum.

Stat. Schemata. 56
Si utroque alterutrum tantum adoptere
placetet, edi præstat ad Homo hypokeminon prosopos Homo hypokimeno:
quia facilius est peritis
Homo prosopa: debita in unum Homo-hypokimenon
comparare, quam imperitus
Homo-hyperkimenon in debita
Homo prosopa dividere.


Subjecta Codicum 57 Subjectum est Stat. Res fiunt subjecta legum voluptati præbendae aut doleri arcendo inserviunt: neque aliter inde subjectum legis est vel principales vel accessi:
Principale [est id quod voluptati usui humano
præbendæ aut doleri arcendo] immediati
subinvenit: accessendum, quod non nisi per
mediaterium alicujus principalis.

Subjecta Divisiones Codicum Stæt. 58. Divisiones Codices unde hausi agitur Homo-hypokimini ab his
hic sunt fontes. 1 Diversitatis specificae formae naturalia ipso in subjecto
principali, tametsi uno aliquo vocabulo generico
comprehensæ. 32. Diversitas etiam intis actus potentiae
ed circa exertos (cos scilicit quos — armæ
operationes

COMPOS. System of Codes. Heads with references to the Sheets where BR V treated of.



---page break---




Codices Personales35*
A particular personal Code is not reduced to
it's ultimate term stage of simplicity, when
there is no all it's Article in it such, as that
there is no person (designable by any
general term of description) concerned
as the primary object of any one of it's policies that
is not concerned also as the primary
object of all the rest. v. No 53.

Tis only by general terms descriptions that Laws
can reach uncertain [& changing] Individuals


---page break---

Subjecta 58. Juris submittere plauserit,) qui rursus vel
ejusdem possunt esse personæ vel divisionem;
4 3, Diversitas subjectorum <add>eidem </add> accessariorum.
2d. Diversitas formæ
superinductæ. 5. Diversitas loci legalis ditionis legis. 6. Diversitas
temporis legalis. legis. v. 54.

Stat. Legem possidere, quid— 59. 9. 10.
Effectus Virtus Legis pendit inter alia a possessione
vel conceptu quam mens habet ejusdem
Legis in an possessio sive conceptus possunt an subvit
vel an <add>respectu datae legis</add> minus est vel magis probabiles.

Stat. Brevitas. 60 9.10.
Quodlibet vocabulum adjutorium (in legibus
in aliis scriptis quibuslibet) manuit
cum probabilitatem respectu Codices Homo-prosopae:
cum latius, tum & singularum
fortium; quæ in intellectu intellectu separatitium. possunt separari
alitis — Quo major est vocabularum summa in
codice, eo minor est probabilitas de quos agitur
respectu tunc totius & dicti alicujus partis.
adioque agitur boni quod in lege expectatur.










Identifier: | JB/096/092/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

51-58, 35*, 59-60

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

092

Info in main headings field

compos. system of codes - heads - with reference to the sheets where treated of v

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31096

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in