JB/096/098/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/098/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/098/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/098/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<head>2</head>
<head>CH.... Of LAWS in general &#x2014; MEASURE of their expediency &#x2014; Points considerable relative to every LAW &#x2014; <add>+</add> <note><del>+ Different Offices of <add>Functions or</add> Laws (<gap/> <unclear>nothing</unclear> them into Criminal <add>Penal</add> &amp; Civil <unclear>law</unclear> more properly Criminal [&#x2014; Penal] and Distributive &#x2014; Impropriety of the Common School distinction <add>division</add> of Justice into Distributive &amp; Commutative.  This comes into the next Chapter &#x2014; &#x2014; <sic>enterd</sic></del></note> Distribution of the WORK.</head>
<head><del>Of LAW in general.</del></head>
<p>The first Principles of Law as of every other Science,
<lb/>
clothed by necessity in the Garb of Abstraction &amp;
<lb/>
Metaphysics, are not therefore void of Truth, nor
<lb/>
undeserving of Attention.<lb/></p>
<p>Taking them by themselves, their
<lb/>
<sic>Subtilty</sic> will <add>may</add> seem to elude the Efforts of Apprehension,
<lb/>
and shrink from the Test of Judgment: but the
<lb/>
Details which [occupy the Bulk of the Performance, <add>issue from them as from their <add>a</add> root</add>]
<lb/>
while they exemplify and explain their Meaning,
<lb/>
will [detect <add>betray</add>] their <sic>falshood</sic> or confirm their Truth.
<lb/></p>
<p>A Law is good, according to the more or less
<lb/>
of clear Happiness which it produces.
<lb/></p>
<p>[Qu. in a NOTE.] Every Law, as such,
<lb/>
necessarily produces a certain Quantity of
<lb/>
Unhappiness.<lb/></p>
<p>In order to be satisfied of this, we must
<lb/>
consider, that an Act which <del>is</del> <add>can be conceived as being</add> prohibited by a Law
<lb/>
must be such an one as Men have a Mind to do,
<lb/>
or have not.<lb/></p>
<p>In the latter Case, the Law would be nugatory,
<lb/>
and such as could never enter into the Head of a
<lb/>
Legislator to enact: accordingly we do not find any <add>such</add><lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


2 CH.... Of LAWS in general — MEASURE of their expediency — Points considerable relative to every LAW — + + Different Offices of Functions or Laws ( nothing them into Criminal Penal & Civil law more properly Criminal [— Penal] and Distributive — Impropriety of the Common School distinction division of Justice into Distributive & Commutative. This comes into the next Chapter — — enterd Distribution of the WORK. Of LAW in general.

The first Principles of Law as of every other Science,
clothed by necessity in the Garb of Abstraction &
Metaphysics, are not therefore void of Truth, nor
undeserving of Attention.

Taking them by themselves, their
Subtilty will may seem to elude the Efforts of Apprehension,
and shrink from the Test of Judgment: but the
Details which [occupy the Bulk of the Performance, issue from them as from their <add>a root</add>]
while they exemplify and explain their Meaning,
will [detect betray] their falshood or confirm their Truth.

A Law is good, according to the more or less
of clear Happiness which it produces.

[Qu. in a NOTE.] Every Law, as such,
necessarily produces a certain Quantity of
Unhappiness.

In order to be satisfied of this, we must
consider, that an Act which is can be conceived as being prohibited by a Law
must be such an one as Men have a Mind to do,
or have not.

In the latter Case, the Law would be nugatory,
and such as could never enter into the Head of a
Legislator to enact: accordingly we do not find any such



Identifier: | JB/096/098/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

098

Info in main headings field

ch…of laws in general - measure of their expediency - points considerable relative to every law - distribution of the work

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f2 / / /

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31102

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in