JB/096/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/111/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/111/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/111/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Were the Duty once recognized for what he<lb/>
is: just, according to our notions of<lb/>
justice: benevolent, according to our notions of<lb/>
benevolence, <note>as well as powerful according to our notions of power</note> the <add>whole</add> affair of Religion would be<lb/>
plain and easy <add>short and easy</add> &#x2014; The current systems<lb/></p>
 
<p><note>The current System</note> There would be no such thing as what are commonly<lb/>
called Religious duties. The <add>Our</add> duties<lb/>
of Theology would vanish into smoke<lb/>
to God would no longer be opposed to our<lb/>
duties to our neighbour. The former would<lb/>
be no longer supposed to consist in a<lb/>
different set of acts, in a different act<lb/>
of sentiments: but as the same set of<lb/>
acts and sentiments as the latter, under a<lb/>
different point of view: a point of view<lb/>
if not false, yet useless.</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p>One might say were pernicious: since<lb/>
it leads men to reduce, or to increase the catalogue:<lb/>
which can not be reduced without a domination<lb/>
of happiness, that is without mischief to<lb/>
others; nor increased without mischief to <del>himself</del> <add>one</add><lb/>
man's self.</p>
 
<p>If he is weak, he has an interest in our<lb/>
homage: if he has that jealousy which<lb/>
arises from the consciousness of impotence.<lb/>
If he <del>has</del> is foolish, he may accept of an<lb/>
action that has nothing to do with the end<lb/>
which he has proposed for us, in the<lb/>
room of one which has: <note>will press upon him</note> but he must be<lb/>
very foolish if he accepts of one small<lb/>
act of the former kind in the room of a<lb/>
multitude of the latter: he must be foolish<lb/>
above measure, if that one act be<lb/>
accepted <add>by him</add> from a different person.<lb/>
Such folly exceeds the ordinary measure<lb/>
of folly visible in [the weakest of] mankind.</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p>The observance of the public happiness in the<lb/>
pursuit of our own would ensure us against<lb/>
his wrath: the pursuit of it, would entitle<lb/>
us to his favour</p>
 
<p>This is the true and simple <add>plain &amp; <del><gap/></del> truly unsophisticated</add> idea of<lb/>
Religion; which <del>makes [it unite</del> <add>consolidates it</add> in such<lb/>
manner with Morality, as to] a separate<lb/>
Sanction and nothing but a Sanction applied<lb/>
to the precepts of morality, to every of them<lb/>
and to none but them: in addition to those<lb/>
which Morality [is pregnant <add>furnishes</add> with] of itself.</p>
 
<p>An idea thus .... is the ....<lb/>
of [systematical] Divines of every persuasion:<lb/>
they dare not controvert it, because<lb/>
they dare not <sic>admitt</sic> it, because it quadrates<lb/>
not with their systems.</p>
 
<head>INTROD. LAW Divine. no separate rule of Action. ][BR][ ][</head>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Were the Duty once recognized for what he
is: just, according to our notions of
justice: benevolent, according to our notions of
benevolence, as well as powerful according to our notions of power the whole affair of Religion would be
plain and easy short and easy — The current systems

The current System There would be no such thing as what are commonly
called Religious duties. The Our duties
of Theology would vanish into smoke
to God would no longer be opposed to our
duties to our neighbour. The former would
be no longer supposed to consist in a
different set of acts, in a different act
of sentiments: but as the same set of
acts and sentiments as the latter, under a
different point of view: a point of view
if not false, yet useless.


---page break---

One might say were pernicious: since
it leads men to reduce, or to increase the catalogue:
which can not be reduced without a domination
of happiness, that is without mischief to
others; nor increased without mischief to himself one
man's self.

If he is weak, he has an interest in our
homage: if he has that jealousy which
arises from the consciousness of impotence.
If he has is foolish, he may accept of an
action that has nothing to do with the end
which he has proposed for us, in the
room of one which has: will press upon him but he must be
very foolish if he accepts of one small
act of the former kind in the room of a
multitude of the latter: he must be foolish
above measure, if that one act be
accepted by him from a different person.
Such folly exceeds the ordinary measure
of folly visible in [the weakest of] mankind.


---page break---

The observance of the public happiness in the
pursuit of our own would ensure us against
his wrath: the pursuit of it, would entitle
us to his favour

This is the true and simple plain & truly unsophisticated idea of
Religion; which makes [it unite consolidates it in such
manner with Morality, as to] a separate
Sanction and nothing but a Sanction applied
to the precepts of morality, to every of them
and to none but them: in addition to those
which Morality [is pregnant furnishes with] of itself.

An idea thus .... is the ....
of [systematical] Divines of every persuasion:
they dare not controvert it, because
they dare not admitt it, because it quadrates
not with their systems.

INTROD. LAW Divine. no separate rule of Action. ][BR][ ][




Identifier: | JB/096/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

introd. law divine no separate rule of action

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31115

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in