JB/096/170/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/170/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/170/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/096/170/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>OFFENCES PRINC. &amp; ACCESS.</head>
 
<p>I shall call them Accessory <add>-ies of</add> [in] the first, &amp; for<lb/>
3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <hi rend='underline'>remove</hi> and so on, as the case is, numbering<lb/>
them from the Principal.</p>
 
<p><del>Why <gap/> <add>numbers</add> in this way</del><lb/>
This course of numbering them I shall call<lb/>
the <hi rend='underline'>direct</hi>: giving to the opposite one the<lb/>
appellation of <hi rend='underline'>inverse</hi>:</p>
 
<pb/>
 
<p>by Judicial decisions concerning<lb/>
what is &amp; what is<lb/>
not a taking &#x2014; The King<lb/>
ought to <del>give <add>their</add> indecision</del> decide it by their<lb/>
determination particular, as it is,<lb/>
in each case &#x2014; otherwise we<lb/>
shall have (at least if <add>future</add> Judges<lb/>
copy from their predecessors)<lb/>
a taking in <hi rend='underline'>Law</hi> which nobody<lb/>
understands to be a taking; &amp;<lb/>
<add>not</add> a taking in Law which every<lb/>
body understands to be one. nor<lb/>
any <gap/> put the matter more out of doubt than it<lb/>
already by the word <gap/>.</p>
 
<p>The use of the Law is, that<lb/>
people may be persuaded, if<lb/>
they <add>[unlawfully]</add> take a thing <add>which they have in</add> they shall</p>


<pb/> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

OFFENCES PRINC. & ACCESS.

I shall call them Accessory -ies of [in] the first, & for
3d remove and so on, as the case is, numbering
them from the Principal.

Why numbers in this way
This course of numbering them I shall call
the direct: giving to the opposite one the
appellation of inverse:


---page break---

by Judicial decisions concerning
what is & what is
not a taking — The King
ought to give their indecision decide it by their
determination particular, as it is,
in each case — otherwise we
shall have (at least if future Judges
copy from their predecessors)
a taking in Law which nobody
understands to be a taking; &
not a taking in Law which every
body understands to be one. nor
any put the matter more out of doubt than it
already by the word .

The use of the Law is, that
people may be persuaded, if
they [unlawfully] take a thing which they have in they shall


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/096/170/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

170a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 170.

Info in main headings field

punishment end of

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31174

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in