JB/096/250/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/250/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


<p>It will I suppose be thought that it is something <add>to be something</add><lb/>
<p>It will I suppose be thought that it is something <add>to be something</add><lb/>
<add>more than blind prejudice</add> that attaches <del><gap/></del> people of this country<lb/>
<add>more than blind prejudice</add> that attaches <del>that</del> people of this country<lb/>
so strongly to the institution of Grand Juries.<lb/>
so strongly to the institution of Grand Juries.<lb/>
That institution is subverted in the method<lb/>
That institution is subverted in the method<lb/>
Line 16: Line 16:
as he understands is <add>sanguine in <sic>it's</sic></add> <del>in</del> favour; and if M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi><lb/>
as he understands is <add>sanguine in <sic>it's</sic></add> <del>in</del> favour; and if M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi><lb/>
Thurloe be is so unhappy as to entertain an<lb/>
Thurloe be is so unhappy as to entertain an<lb/>
ill opinion. He has accordingly made him the <gap/><lb/>
ill opinion. He has accordingly made him the part<lb/>
of his declamation.</p>
of his declamation.</p>
<p>As to M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Thurloe, I hope <add>he has</add> his character <add>that</add> will<lb/>
be his defence. If not, he must look out for <note>and the <gap/> of which he forms a part</note><lb/>
<del>other</del> <add>better</add> defenders: I have no other concern to defend<lb/>
him, than <del>as for</del> what I have to defend<lb/>
any man whom I see unjustly <del><gap/></del>: <add>much attacked</add> and<lb/>
as far as I think him <add>attacked</add> unjustly. <del>attacked.</del><lb/>
whether he is so or no in this <del>instance</del> <add>score will be</add> seen <note>from the examination of the Proposal which it is said to patronise.</note></p>
<pb/>
<p>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning has doubly disappointed me &#x2014;<lb/>
in the side he has taken; and in the course<lb/>
he has taken to defend <add>maintain</add> it. M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning<lb/>
does not approve of abrogating Appeals<lb/>
for Murder, because <del>to abrogate them is</del> <add>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning does</add><lb/>
not like innovations, because this is an<lb/>
innovation, and who can say what may<lb/>
be the consequences of it. This is <add>the drift of</add> his<lb/>
speech: I can make no more of it.<lb/>
M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning not like innovations? then<lb/>
M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning does not like the <del>assembly</del> <add>office that</add><lb/>
<del>in which he sits</del>, <add>places him in the assembly in which he sits</add> nor the business which<lb/>
calls him there: he does not like acts of<lb/>
parliament, he does not like laws. for<lb/>
what is any Law but an innovation? <del>he</del><lb/>
He who does not like innovations, does not like<lb/>
<add>any of</add> those benefits that are to be wrought to the community<lb/>
by good laws: for the greater <del>the</del> any<lb/>
such benefit, the greater the innovation.</p>
<pb/>
<p>It would be as impertinent for me to defend his<lb/>
character in general, as it was in that writer<lb/>
to attack it. I am one of those obscure<lb/>
and speculating persons, M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Printer, who<lb/>
are too high <add>in one sense</add> to feel themselves personally interested<lb/>
either for or against men in power &#x2014;<lb/>
not high enough in <gap/>:</p>
<p>I had other expectations from M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Dunning's<lb/>
approved <add>political</add> integrity, from his <del><gap/></del> <add>nervous</add> brilliant eloquence<lb/>
and solid understanding. If the<lb/>
innovation in question has any probable ill<lb/>
consequences it was for him to have seen them<lb/>
it was for him to have been able and willing<lb/>
to point them out.</p>
<pb/>
<head>23.</head>
<p><add>A Minister</add> The Crown might work <sic>it's</sic> revenges in a<lb/>
very effectual manner by <del><gap/></del> <add>making</add> an<lb/>
instrument of the party having right to<lb/>
Appeal &#x2014; If the party killed were killed<lb/>
in prosecution of their Schemes, it is likely<lb/>
his Heir or his Widow might be in their<lb/>
Schemes too &#x2014; <del>They are</del> It might thus put<lb/>
<del>Tye up its own hands from pardoning</del> <add>itself under a very <sic>agreable</sic> disability, and find</add><lb/>
a very effectual means of tying up its own<lb/>
hands from pardoning.</p>
<head>APPEAL. [BR][3][ ]</head>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:12, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

It will I suppose be thought that it is something to be something
more than blind prejudice that attaches that people of this country
so strongly to the institution of Grand Juries.
That institution is subverted in the method
of Appeal.

A writer in the Public Advertizer of ...
May, declares expresses himself vehemently dissatisfied
with the proposal: because Mr Thurloe
as he understands is Attorney General, and Mr Thurloe
as he understands is sanguine in it's in favour; and if Mr
Thurloe be is so unhappy as to entertain an
ill opinion. He has accordingly made him the part
of his declamation.

As to Mr Thurloe, I hope he has his character that will
be his defence. If not, he must look out for and the of which he forms a part
other better defenders: I have no other concern to defend
him, than as for what I have to defend
any man whom I see unjustly : much attacked and
as far as I think him attacked unjustly. attacked.
whether he is so or no in this instance score will be seen from the examination of the Proposal which it is said to patronise.


---page break---

Mr Dunning has doubly disappointed me —
in the side he has taken; and in the course
he has taken to defend maintain it. Mr Dunning
does not approve of abrogating Appeals
for Murder, because to abrogate them is Mr Dunning does
not like innovations, because this is an
innovation, and who can say what may
be the consequences of it. This is the drift of his
speech: I can make no more of it.
Mr Dunning not like innovations? then
Mr Dunning does not like the assembly office that
in which he sits, places him in the assembly in which he sits nor the business which
calls him there: he does not like acts of
parliament, he does not like laws. for
what is any Law but an innovation? he
He who does not like innovations, does not like
any of those benefits that are to be wrought to the community
by good laws: for the greater the any
such benefit, the greater the innovation.


---page break---

It would be as impertinent for me to defend his
character in general, as it was in that writer
to attack it. I am one of those obscure
and speculating persons, Mr Printer, who
are too high in one sense to feel themselves personally interested
either for or against men in power —
not high enough in :

I had other expectations from Mr Dunning's
approved political integrity, from his nervous brilliant eloquence
and solid understanding. If the
innovation in question has any probable ill
consequences it was for him to have seen them
it was for him to have been able and willing
to point them out.


---page break---

23.

A Minister The Crown might work it's revenges in a
very effectual manner by making an
instrument of the party having right to
Appeal — If the party killed were killed
in prosecution of their Schemes, it is likely
his Heir or his Widow might be in their
Schemes too — They are It might thus put
Tye up its own hands from pardoning itself under a very agreable disability, and find
a very effectual means of tying up its own
hands from pardoning.

APPEAL. [BR][3][ ]




Identifier: | JB/096/250/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

23

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

250

Info in main headings field

appeal

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31254

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in