JB/100/014/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/100/014/002: Difference between revisions

RichardDavis (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/014/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/014/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Place and Time</head>
<p><add>That substantial parties which may do in a day</add> <del>What </del>the English Judge does one time in a <lb/>hundred, the <unclear>Cawses</unclear> and the <sic>Bramin </sic> <add>like the English fathers</add> may <lb/>do every day: <del>their</del> inclinations may be perverse, <lb/> <del>knowledge</del> judgment may be weak: but at any<lb/> rate they have their eyes open and their hands <lb/>at liberty.</p>
 
<p>And who would think it? <add>note</add> this mass of absurdity <lb/>is the work <del>not</del> of modern <unclear>refinement</unclear>, not of<lb/> <sic>antient</sic> barbarism There was a time <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> the times of it are plainly marked, visible in history</note> when even <lb/>an English judge had it in his power to do justice. <lb/><del>Then</del> It was then thought no more a hardship to [oblige] <lb/>a man to attend his own concerns than the concerns<lb/> of other people. Each party was ready <lb/>and to answer <del><unclear>within presence</unclear> of the judge</del> <lb/>to examine and to be examined in the presence<lb/> of the judge. Advocates there were a few: attorneys<lb/> there were none. Not a farthing of <sic>expence</sic> <unclear>set on </unclear> <lb/>either party: till it was seen which of them had<lb/> deserved it: if the [one had <del>been </del>complained without <lb/>cause he was fined: <add>for his vexation</add> if the other had contested<lb/> the claim without reason] <add>a man's</add> complaint had been<lb/> groundless he was fined for his <sic>vexatiousness</sic>: <lb/> <note>These <gap/> <add>plans</add>, the only ones by which the wrongdoer is punished without taking protection from the injured, was long ago matter of form. </note> if his <sic>defence</sic>, for his litigiousness. <del>Where</del> The defending<lb/> <add><sic>defence</sic></add> of justice and injustice had become <lb/>a trade, the judges, who being taken from that trade<lb/> were <add>liable at any time to be</add> <del>frequently</del> sent back to it, were not long in discovering <lb/>that <del>a</del> fines <del>whereby</del> which bore so heavy on<lb/>
<add>that</add> </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:14, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Place and Time

That substantial parties which may do in a day What the English Judge does one time in a
hundred, the Cawses and the Bramin like the English fathers may
do every day: their inclinations may be perverse,
knowledge judgment may be weak: but at any
rate they have their eyes open and their hands
at liberty.

And who would think it? note this mass of absurdity
is the work not of modern refinement, not of
antient barbarism There was a time + + the times of it are plainly marked, visible in history when even
an English judge had it in his power to do justice.
Then It was then thought no more a hardship to [oblige]
a man to attend his own concerns than the concerns
of other people. Each party was ready
and to answer within presence of the judge
to examine and to be examined in the presence
of the judge. Advocates there were a few: attorneys
there were none. Not a farthing of expence set on
either party: till it was seen which of them had
deserved it: if the [one had been complained without
cause he was fined: for his vexation if the other had contested
the claim without reason] a man's complaint had been
groundless he was fined for his vexatiousness:
These plans, the only ones by which the wrongdoer is punished without taking protection from the injured, was long ago matter of form. if his defence, for his litigiousness. Where The defending
defence of justice and injustice had become
a trade, the judges, who being taken from that trade
were liable at any time to be frequently sent back to it, were not long in discovering
that a fines whereby which bore so heavy on
that




Identifier: | JB/100/014/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

100

Main Headings

influence of time and place

Folio number

014

Info in main headings field

place and time

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

32030

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in