★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>8 Aug 1811 9</p> | |||
<head>Fallacies</head> | |||
<note>Ch. Classification</note> | |||
<p>9</p> | |||
<p>Allotting to [the expression of] those <add><sic>groupes</sic> of</add> fallacies which<lb/> | |||
[appear <add>seem</add> to] apply themselves <del>to</del> respectively to the <del>jud</del><lb/> | |||
imagination and the judgment the <add>classical</add> appellation<lb/> | |||
of arguments <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad imaginationem</foreign></hi> and arguments<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad judicium</foreign></hi>, the following are the appellations <add>denominations</add> that<lb/> | |||
have presented themselves as capable <add>applicable</add> of serving<lb/> | |||
to characterize and distinguish the <add><unclear>condivident</unclear></add> <add>component</add> <sic>groupes</sic> <del>into</del><lb/> | |||
that may be formed by this subdivision of the inordinately<lb/> | |||
ample class <add>the component elements</add> of which <del>the</del> <add>would</add> on the same plan <add>principle</add><lb/> | |||
of denomination be termed arguments <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad affectus</foreign></hi>.</p> | |||
<note>17<lb/> | |||
Names of the <hi rend="underline">orders</hi><lb/> | |||
of fallacies in the<lb/> | |||
above plan: — with<lb/> | |||
subdivision of Order 1.<lb/> | |||
I. Arguments <foreign>ad affectus</foreign><lb/> | |||
II. <foreign>ad imaginationem</foreign><lb/> | |||
III. — <foreign>ad judicium</foreign>.</note> | |||
<p>Arguments 1. <foreign>ad <hi rend="underline">vericundiam</hi></foreign> 2 <foreign>ad <hi rend="underline">quietem</hi></foreign><lb/> | |||
3 <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad socordium</foreign></hi> 4 <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad rectum</foreign> <add><foreign>sen timeram</foreign></add></hi> 5 <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad superstitionum</foreign></hi><lb/> | |||
<del>6 — <hi rend="underline"><foreign>ad invidentiam</foreign></hi></del> <add>6 <foreign>ad superbiam</foreign></add> 7 <foreign>ad odium</foreign> 8 <foreign>ad amicitium</foreign><lb/> | |||
9 <foreign>ad invidentiam</foreign></p> | |||
<note>Division of Order I<lb/> | |||
1 — <foreign>ad vericundiam</foreign><lb/> | |||
2. <foreign>ad quietem</foreign><lb/> | |||
3. <foreign>ad socordium</foreign><lb/> | |||
4. — <foreign>ad rectum</foreign><lb/> | |||
5. — <foreign>ad superstitionum</foreign><lb/> | |||
6 — <foreign>ad superbiam</foreign><lb/> | |||
7. — <foreign>ad odium</foreign><lb/> | |||
8 — <foreign>ad amicitium</foreign><lb/> | |||
9 — <foreign>ad invidentiam</foreign></note> | |||
<p>In the arrangement <add>distribution</add> thus made imperfections<lb/> | |||
will be found the removal of which, should the removal<lb/> | |||
of them be found practicable and at the same time<lb/> | |||
worth the trouble, must be left to some <sic>experter</sic> hand.<lb/> | |||
The denominations themselves not in every instant sufficiently<lb/> | |||
distinct from each other: the articles ranged under<lb/> | |||
them respectively not appertaining <add>with a degree of propriety sufficiently exclusive</add> to the heads under<lb/> | |||
which they are placed — To <del><gap/></del> these objections<lb/> | |||
not to mention others no satisfactory answer <add>answer that appeared</add> has been found.</p> | |||
<note>18<lb/> | |||
Imperfections of<lb/> | |||
this arrangement<lb/> | |||
1. denomination not<lb/> | |||
sufficiently distinct<lb/> | |||
2. G<gap/>, not properly<lb/> | |||
appertaining to their<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">divisions</hi> — &c</note> | |||
<p>Imperfect as it is, the arrangement [it is hoped] will<lb/> | |||
still it is hoped be found by the reflecting <add>thinking</add> reader be found to be not <!-- Continues in the margin --> altogether without<lb/> | |||
its use</p> | |||
<note>19<lb/> | |||
Notwithstanding this<lb/> | |||
the classification will<lb/> | |||
be found better than<lb/> | |||
none, and is the least<lb/> | |||
imperfect J.B. could make<lb/> | |||
To mend it or make a<lb/> | |||
better is left for some <sic>experter</sic> hand.</note> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
8 Aug 1811 9
Fallacies Ch. Classification
9
Allotting to [the expression of] those groupes of fallacies which
[appear seem to] apply themselves to respectively to the jud
imagination and the judgment the classical appellation
of arguments ad imaginationem and arguments
ad judicium, the following are the appellations denominations that
have presented themselves as capable applicable of serving
to characterize and distinguish the condivident component groupes into
that may be formed by this subdivision of the inordinately
ample class the component elements of which the would on the same plan principle
of denomination be termed arguments ad affectus.
17
Names of the orders
of fallacies in the
above plan: — with
subdivision of Order 1.
I. Arguments ad affectus
II. ad imaginationem
III. — ad judicium.
Arguments 1. ad vericundiam 2 ad quietem
3 ad socordium 4 ad rectum sen timeram 5 ad superstitionum
6 — ad invidentiam 6 ad superbiam 7 ad odium 8 ad amicitium
9 ad invidentiam
Division of Order I
1 — ad vericundiam
2. ad quietem
3. ad socordium
4. — ad rectum
5. — ad superstitionum
6 — ad superbiam
7. — ad odium
8 — ad amicitium
9 — ad invidentiam
In the arrangement distribution thus made imperfections
will be found the removal of which, should the removal
of them be found practicable and at the same time
worth the trouble, must be left to some experter hand.
The denominations themselves not in every instant sufficiently
distinct from each other: the articles ranged under
them respectively not appertaining with a degree of propriety sufficiently exclusive to the heads under
which they are placed — To these objections
not to mention others no satisfactory answer answer that appeared has been found.
18
Imperfections of
this arrangement
1. denomination not
sufficiently distinct
2. G, not properly
appertaining to their
divisions — &c
Imperfect as it is, the arrangement [it is hoped] will
still it is hoped be found by the reflecting thinking reader be found to be not altogether without
its use
19
Notwithstanding this
the classification will
be found better than
none, and is the least
imperfect J.B. could make
To mend it or make a
better is left for some experter hand.
|
Identifier: | JB/104/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1811-08-08 |
17-19 |
||
|
104 |
fallacies |
||
|
055 |
fallacies |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d9 / e9 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
34026 |
|||
