JB/104/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/081/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>21 June 1810 + §.5 8<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
<note>1. Generalia<lb/>
Ch. 1. Generalia<lb/>
§.5. II of the Outs</note>
<p>1</p>


<note>1<lb/>
The persons by whom<lb/>
the fallacies of the<lb/>
Ins and d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of the<lb/>
Outs are employed<lb/>
are the same:<lb/>
<!-- Continued below the first note above -->
viz. in <hi rend="underline">possession</hi><lb/>
when <hi rend="underline">Ins</hi>: in <hi rend="underline">expectancy</hi><lb/>
when <hi rend="underline">Outs</hi></note>
<p><del>Fallacies useful to the Outs are all that serve to <hi rend="underline">diffuse</hi> &amp;<lb/>
impede or discredit good measures proposed by the Ins.</del></p>
<p>§. 5 Fallacies of the <hi rend="underline">Outs</hi> &#x2014; their general nature.</p>
<p>If, in speaking of the Outs regard be had<lb/>
to the <hi rend="underline">persons</hi> thus described, <add>in</add> the fallacies in<lb/>
which the Ins find the means of defence, for <del>such</del> <del><add>viz for whatever</add></del> <add>viz for such</add><lb/>
abuses and other imperfections, <del><gap/></del> whatsoever they be,<lb/>
in which they behold sources of profit to themselves<lb/>
<note><add>[+]</add> which in defence<lb/>
of their more immediate<lb/>
interests they find<lb/>
an interest in setting<lb/>
to work</note><lb/>
whatsoever fallacies there be <add>may be to be found</add> in which <add>the dissemination of which</add> <add>in the view of which</add> they have an<lb/>
<add>a sinister</add> interest, in the same fallacies have the Outs also<lb/>
the like interest: the difference between <hi rend="underline">possession</hi><lb/>
and <hi rend="underline">expectancy</hi> being <add>constituting</add> the only <del><gap/></del> difference.<add>(a)</add></p>


<note><add>(a)</add> Note to say that<lb/>
Neutrals are here laid<lb/>
out of the account.</note>
<note>2<lb/>
But at any given<lb/>
time fallacies of<lb/>
the Ins will not<lb/>
all suit [the position<lb/>
of] the Outs:<lb/>
nor vice versa</note>
<p>But, if regard be had to <add>Turn to</add> <add>Look at</add> the <add>their</add> position in <add>circumstance of</add><lb/>
which they stand, <add>act,</add> the fallacies which we<lb/>
<del>shall see reason to class <add><gap/></add> under the general denomination</del> <add>belong to the position of the Ins</add><lb/>
<del>of fallacies of the <gap/> Ins,</del> will be seen to<lb/>
have no application to the <del>case</del> <add>position</add> of the <del>Ins</del> Outs.<lb/>
The position of the Outs will at the same time be<lb/>
seen to have a set of fallacies peculiar to itself</p>
<note>3<lb/>
Fallacies, peculiar<lb/>
to the position of the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Outs</hi>, are such as<lb/>
promise to promote<lb/>
this impropriety <gap/><lb/>
thence the discussion<lb/>
of the <hi rend="underline">Ins</hi></note>
<p>Fallacies peculiar to the position of the <hi rend="underline">Outs</hi>, are<lb/>
such <del>as</del> the tendency of which is to <del>be cast reproach<lb/>
upon the Ins</del> promote the discussion of the Ins: to promote<lb/>
it viz. in the only way in which it is in the power of<lb/>
arguments proper or improper <add>relevant or irrelevant</add> to promote any such<lb/>
event, viz. by lowering them in the estimation of those <add>their measures, and thence the authors <note>and promoters of those<lb/>
measures</note></add><lb/>
[to whom it belongs to judge.] <add>and</add> whose judgment presents a<lb/>
prospect of being contributory to such event.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

21 June 1810 + §.5 8
Fallacies
1. Generalia
Ch. 1. Generalia
§.5. II of the Outs

1

1
The persons by whom
the fallacies of the
Ins and do of the
Outs are employed
are the same:
viz. in possession
when Ins: in expectancy
when Outs

Fallacies useful to the Outs are all that serve to diffuse &
impede or discredit good measures proposed by the Ins.

§. 5 Fallacies of the Outs — their general nature.

If, in speaking of the Outs regard be had
to the persons thus described, in the fallacies in
which the Ins find the means of defence, for such viz for whatever viz for such
abuses and other imperfections, whatsoever they be,
in which they behold sources of profit to themselves
[+] which in defence
of their more immediate
interests they find
an interest in setting
to work

whatsoever fallacies there be may be to be found in which the dissemination of which in the view of which they have an
a sinister interest, in the same fallacies have the Outs also
the like interest: the difference between possession
and expectancy being constituting the only difference.(a)

(a) Note to say that
Neutrals are here laid
out of the account.

2
But at any given
time fallacies of
the Ins will not
all suit [the position
of] the Outs:
nor vice versa

But, if regard be had to Turn to Look at the their position in circumstance of
which they stand, act, the fallacies which we
shall see reason to class under the general denomination belong to the position of the Ins
of fallacies of the Ins, will be seen to
have no application to the case position of the Ins Outs.
The position of the Outs will at the same time be
seen to have a set of fallacies peculiar to itself

3
Fallacies, peculiar
to the position of the
Outs, are such as
promise to promote
this impropriety
thence the discussion
of the Ins

Fallacies peculiar to the position of the Outs, are
such as the tendency of which is to be cast reproach
upon the Ins
promote the discussion of the Ins: to promote
it viz. in the only way in which it is in the power of
arguments proper or improper relevant or irrelevant to promote any such
event, viz. by lowering them in the estimation of those their measures, and thence the authors and promoters of those
measures

[to whom it belongs to judge.] and whose judgment presents a
prospect of being contributory to such event.



Identifier: | JB/104/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1810-06-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

fallacies of the outs - their general nature

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34052

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in