JB/104/085/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/085/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


6 Aug 1811 4
<head>6 Aug 1811 4<lb/>
Fallacies
Fallacies</head>
Generalia
<note>Generalia<lb/>
Ch. Parts b<gap/>
Ch. Parts bearable</note>
<p>4</p>
<note>6<lb/>
In fabricators case<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">consciousness</hi> is not<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">evil</hi>, without evil<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">intention</hi>.<lb/>
Shilling <add>bad</add> &#x2014; no intention<lb/>
to make undue<lb/>
profit of it, in the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">consciousness</hi> of its<lb/>
badness nothing <hi rend="underline">evil</hi>.</note>
<p>In the case of the fabricator, a correspondent <hi rend="underline">intention</hi> &#x2014;<lb/>
an intention to which the same attribute <hi rend="underline">evil</hi> may<lb/>
with propriety be applied, is implied when that same<lb/>
attribute is applied to <add>the subject of</add> <hi rend="underline">consciousness</hi>.</p>


4
<p>On the part of the fabricator <add>in the case of the bad shilling</add> suppose the absence<lb/>
of all intention to make <add>in the way of utterance</add> undue profit by the article<lb/>
so fabricated, <del>it is not merely</del> <add>the mere circumstance of his knowing</add> the mere consciousness <add>knowledge</add><lb/>
of its badness <add>the article to be <hi rend="underline">bad</hi></add> in the character of a shilling suffices<lb/>
not of itself to warrant the attaching to it <add>his consciousness</add> that reproachful<lb/>
attribute.</p>


In the case of the fabricator, a correspondent intention &#x2014;
<note>7<lb/>
an intention to which the same attribute evil may
<hi rend="underline">Generalities</hi> <gap/><lb/>
with propriety be applies, is implied when that sam
seriousness of the badness<lb/>
attribute is applied toe the subject of consciousness.
present, evil intention<lb/>
will <hi rend="underline">not</hi> be absent.<lb/>
But in particular<lb/>
cases, <hi rend="underline">yes</hi></note>


On the part of the fabricator in the case of the bad shilling suppose the absence
<p>In general this evilness of intention this<lb/>
of all intention to make in the way of utterance undue profit by the article
<add>concomitant</add> accompaniment of evil intention will not be wanting<lb/>
so fabricated, it is not merely the mere circumstance of his knowing the mere consciousness knowledge
to the consciousness<add>: but</add>. But cases may put, nor those<lb/>
of its badness the article to be bad in the character of a shilling suffices
by any means unexampled ones, in which the intention <add>to the intention</add><lb/>
not of itself to warrant the attaching to it his consciousness that reproachful
has not been <hi rend="underline">evil</hi> <add>no such reproachful epithet has justly been attributable</add>.</p>
attribute.


6
<note>8<lb/>
In fabrication case
Example 1. <hi rend="underline">Button</hi>.<lb/>
consciousness is not
Resemblance of a plain<lb/>
evil, without evil
button to d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> shilling<lb/>
intention.
known to fabricator,<lb/>
Shilling bad &#x2014; no intention
yet to pass it for such<lb/>
to make undue
was not his intention.<lb/>
profit of it, in the
By accident, with or<lb/>
consciousness of its
without negligence on<lb/>
badness nothing evil.
his part, it fell into<lb/>
 
the hands of an Utterer<lb/>
In general this evilness of intention this
who passed it.<lb/>
concomitant accompaniment of evil intention will not be wanting
Utterer (who to be so<lb/>
to the consciousness. But : but cases may put, nor those
must first have been <hi rend="underline">acceptor</hi>)<lb/>
by any means unexampled ones, in which the intention to the intention
may in such<lb/>
no such reproachful spillins has justly been attributable
character have been<lb/>
has not been evil.
evilly-conscious or not,<lb/>
 
and if not, temerarious<lb/>
7
(thence blamable)<lb/>
Generalities <gap/>
or unblameable.</note>
seriousness of the badness
present, evil intention
will not be absent.
But in particular
cases, yes
 
1. The intention in which it was made, was that
of serving for a button: that it bears a certain degree degree
of resemblance to many a piece of metal which <gap/>
is in the habit of being passed for a shilling is a circumstance
of which he is not unconscious: but <gap/> that it
should be passed as such either by himself or by any
other person, was a circumstance result that in the intention of the man had never
entered into his intention had never found a place. By accident, it finds its
way into hand, by in which, with or without the circumstance
of evil consciousness with or without the circumstance of culpable blamable
ignorance or attention it has obtains currency in that character.
 
8
Example 1. Button.
Resemblance of a plain
button to do shilling
known to fabricator,
yet to pass it for such
was not his intention.
By accident, with or
without negligence on
his part, it fell into
the hands of an Utterer
who passed it.
Utterer (who to be so
must first have been acceptor)
may in each
character have ben
evilly-conscious or not,
and if not, h<gap/>
(thence blamable,
or unblameable.


<p>1. The <hi rend="underline">intention</hi> in which it was made, was that<lb/>
of serving for a <hi rend="underline">button</hi>: that it bears a certain degree <add>degree</add><lb/>
of resemblance to many a piece of metal which <del><gap/></del><lb/>
is in the habit of being passed for a shilling is a circumstance<lb/>
of which he is not unconscious: but <del><gap/></del> that it<lb/>
should be passed as such either by himself or by any<lb/>
other person, was a circumstance <add>result</add> that <add>in the intention of the man</add> had never<lb/>
entered into his intention <add>had <unclear>never</unclear> found a place</add>. By accident, it finds its<lb/>
way into hands, by <add>in</add> which, with or without the circumstance<lb/>
of evil consciousness with or without the circumstance of <del>culpable</del> <add>blamable</add><lb/>
ignorance or attention it has <add>obtains</add> currency in that character.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug 1811 4
Fallacies
Generalia
Ch. Parts bearable

4

6
In fabricators case
consciousness is not
evil, without evil
intention.
Shilling bad — no intention
to make undue
profit of it, in the
consciousness of its
badness nothing evil.

In the case of the fabricator, a correspondent intention
an intention to which the same attribute evil may
with propriety be applied, is implied when that same
attribute is applied to the subject of consciousness.

On the part of the fabricator in the case of the bad shilling suppose the absence
of all intention to make in the way of utterance undue profit by the article
so fabricated, it is not merely the mere circumstance of his knowing the mere consciousness knowledge
of its badness the article to be bad in the character of a shilling suffices
not of itself to warrant the attaching to it his consciousness that reproachful
attribute.

7
Generalities
seriousness of the badness
present, evil intention
will not be absent.
But in particular
cases, yes

In general this evilness of intention this
concomitant accompaniment of evil intention will not be wanting
to the consciousness: but. But cases may put, nor those
by any means unexampled ones, in which the intention to the intention
has not been evil no such reproachful epithet has justly been attributable.

8
Example 1. Button.
Resemblance of a plain
button to do shilling
known to fabricator,
yet to pass it for such
was not his intention.
By accident, with or
without negligence on
his part, it fell into
the hands of an Utterer
who passed it.
Utterer (who to be so
must first have been acceptor)
may in such
character have been
evilly-conscious or not,
and if not, temerarious
(thence blamable)
or unblameable.

1. The intention in which it was made, was that
of serving for a button: that it bears a certain degree degree
of resemblance to many a piece of metal which
is in the habit of being passed for a shilling is a circumstance
of which he is not unconscious: but that it
should be passed as such either by himself or by any
other person, was a circumstance result that in the intention of the man had never
entered into his intention had never found a place. By accident, it finds its
way into hands, by in which, with or without the circumstance
of evil consciousness with or without the circumstance of culpable blamable
ignorance or attention it has obtains currency in that character.



Identifier: | JB/104/085/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34056

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in