JB/104/147/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/147/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>25 May 1811 5<lb/>
Fallacies</head>


<note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 9<lb/>
Ch. Authority<lb/>
§ <del>Analysis</del><lb/>
§.2. II. Subjects</note>


<p>2</p>
<note>5<add>(a)</add><lb/>
1. Not only question of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">fact</hi> but d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of <hi rend="underline">law</hi><lb/>
a question <foreign>quid<lb/>
factum</foreign><lb/>
2. Ex. gr. Question<lb/>
as to import of Stat.<lb/>
of Ed. 3. Parliaments<lb/>
to be held "once a year<lb/>
"or oftener if need be."</note>
<p><del>On the <add>any</add> occasion of judicial argument</del> <add>In judicial procedure</add> a distinction<lb/>
which on every occasion is liable to <del>arise</del> be brought to<lb/>
view is that <del><gap/></del> between the question of fact and the<lb/>
question of law: &#x2014; but to the purpose <del>now</del> <add>at present</add> in hand,<lb/>
<add>viz. with a view to the question <hi rend="underline"><foreign>quid faciendum</foreign></hi>,</add><lb/>
under the question <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>quid factum</foreign></hi> is included as<lb/>
well the question of <hi rend="underline">law</hi> as the question of fact: the<lb/>
question whether to <del>such or such effect</del> <add>the effect supposed</add> a law or rule of<lb/>
law exists or is to be considered as existing being as<lb/>
much a question of fact &#x2014; <add>and as such</add> a question distinct from the<lb/>
question <hi rend="underline"><foreign>quid faciendum</foreign></hi> as any other question of<lb/>
fact that can be named.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

25 May 1811 5
Fallacies

2o 9
Ch. Authority
§ Analysis
§.2. II. Subjects

2

5(a)
1. Not only question of
fact but do of law
a question quid
factum

2. Ex. gr. Question
as to import of Stat.
of Ed. 3. Parliaments
to be held "once a year
"or oftener if need be."

On the any occasion of judicial argument In judicial procedure a distinction
which on every occasion is liable to arise be brought to
view is that between the question of fact and the
question of law: — but to the purpose now at present in hand,
viz. with a view to the question quid faciendum,
under the question quid factum is included as
well the question of law as the question of fact: the
question whether to such or such effect the effect supposed a law or rule of
law exists or is to be considered as existing being as
much a question of fact — and as such a question distinct from the
question quid faciendum as any other question of
fact that can be named.



Identifier: | JB/104/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

5a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

147

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34118

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in