JB/104/249/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/249/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><gap/> July 1811 July 4 + ++ <del>B <gap/></del> E 10<lb/>
Fallacies Fallacies</head>
 
<note>V. <foreign>ad superstitionem</foreign><lb/>
Ch.<lb/>
§.5</note>
 
<p>5 1</p>
 
<p>§.5 Duration of laws &#x2014; Possible erroneous arrangements <add>in</add> relation to it.</p>
 
<note>or 1<lb/>
In point of duration<lb/>
defeasible perpetuity<lb/>
when consistent with the<lb/>
nature of the case<lb/>
the only arrangement<lb/>
customary as well as<lb/>
<del>generally</del> proper<lb/>
except for special<lb/>
cause.</note>
 
<p><del>In all these cases there</del> In respect of duration, in<lb/>
all these cases [there is] one and the same sort of arrangement<lb/>
presents itself as being, in so far as it is in<lb/>
the nature of the case practicable, the only one that is<lb/>
conformable <add>not only</add> to the dictates of <add>general</add> utility as presented by reason<lb/>
and experience as well as <add>but also</add> to <add>the</add> most generally <add>extensively</add> prevalent<lb/>
usage. to little less than uninterrupted usage.</p>
 
<p>This arrangement is that which has place where<lb/>
<add>the duration of</add> the law in question is understood to be perpetual <add>continue in force</add>,<lb/>
<del>supposing</del> <add>so long and so <del>long only</del> far only</add> except in so far as by the <del><gap/></del> sovereignty<lb/>
in question no abrogation <add>of it</add> or alteration in it has<lb/>
place</p>
 
<note>or 2<lb/>
In cases 1, 2, 3, 4<lb/>
this is consistent with<lb/>
the nature of the case</note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline"><sic>Defeasable</sic> perpetuity</hi> is the name by which<lb/>
in two words or in one word this most ordinary<lb/>
and natural mode of duration may be characterized<lb/>
<unclear>by</unclear> the arrangement presented by the principle of <sic>defeasable</sic><lb/>
perpetuity.</p>
 
<note>or 3<lb/>
<unclear>Seems</unclear> in cases 5 <gap/><lb/>
Special reservation<lb/>
excepted, in case 5<lb/>
the former government<lb/>
is extinguished<lb/>
by the nature of the<lb/>
compact:&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014; in case 6 the f<gap/><lb/>
<unclear>freedom</unclear>, i.e. exemption<lb/>
from <unclear>government</unclear></note>
 
<p>In <add>each of</add> the four first of these <add>six</add> cases this arrangement is<lb/>
in <add>consistent with</add> the nature of the case a practicable one: in each of<lb/>
those cases the perpetuity is <del><gap/></del> in the nature of the case <hi rend="underline">defeasible</hi>.</p>
 
<p>In the fifth and sixth above, it is not in the<lb/>
nature of the case practicable: in neither of those cases<lb/>
is the perpetuity <del><gap/> in the nat</del> in the nature of the case<lb/>
defeasible</p>
 
<p>In the <add>The</add> case of an incorporative union between two<lb/>
sovereignties <add>sovereignties is that of a contract, in virtue of which</add> the two <del>original</del> contracting parties, the two<lb/>
original sovereignties are both of them extinct and <unclear>gone</unclear><add>[+]</add>.<lb/>
<note><add>[+]</add> Unless <del><gap/></del> in so<lb/>
far as in and by the<lb/>
act of incorporation<lb/>
special provision is<lb/>
made for the purpose<lb/>
there exists no person, no party<lb/>
by whom any such<lb/>
operation as that of<lb/>
dissolving the union<lb/>
and replacing <add>restoring</add> <add>re-instituting</add> the<lb/>
two quondam sovereignties<lb/>
in <add>into</add> their original<lb/>
state is capable<lb/>
of being performed.</note><lb/>
<del>There exists no party no person capable of performing any</del><lb/>
There exists no person <add>not any person or persons</add> other than the <del>whole</del> aggregate<lb/>
body of the whole community, <add>excepted,</add> by whom any such restitution<lb/>
can be so much as called for <add>demanded</add> and claimed. <add>demanded.</add></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

July 1811 July 4 + ++ B E 10
Fallacies Fallacies

V. ad superstitionem
Ch.
§.5

5 1

§.5 Duration of laws — Possible erroneous arrangements in relation to it.

or 1
In point of duration
defeasible perpetuity
when consistent with the
nature of the case
the only arrangement
customary as well as
generally proper
except for special
cause.

In all these cases there In respect of duration, in
all these cases [there is] one and the same sort of arrangement
presents itself as being, in so far as it is in
the nature of the case practicable, the only one that is
conformable not only to the dictates of general utility as presented by reason
and experience as well as but also to the most generally extensively prevalent
usage. to little less than uninterrupted usage.

This arrangement is that which has place where
the duration of the law in question is understood to be perpetual continue in force,
supposing so long and so long only far only except in so far as by the sovereignty
in question no abrogation of it or alteration in it has
place

or 2
In cases 1, 2, 3, 4
this is consistent with
the nature of the case

Defeasable perpetuity is the name by which
in two words or in one word this most ordinary
and natural mode of duration may be characterized
by the arrangement presented by the principle of defeasable
perpetuity.

or 3
Seems in cases 5
Special reservation
excepted, in case 5
the former government
is extinguished
by the nature of the
compact:—
— in case 6 the f
freedom, i.e. exemption
from government

In each of the four first of these six cases this arrangement is
in consistent with the nature of the case a practicable one: in each of
those cases the perpetuity is in the nature of the case defeasible.

In the fifth and sixth above, it is not in the
nature of the case practicable: in neither of those cases
is the perpetuity in the nat in the nature of the case
defeasible

In the The case of an incorporative union between two
sovereignties sovereignties is that of a contract, in virtue of which the two original contracting parties, the two
original sovereignties are both of them extinct and gone[+].
[+] Unless in so
far as in and by the
act of incorporation
special provision is
made for the purpose
there exists no person, no party
by whom any such
operation as that of
dissolving the union
and replacing restoring re-instituting the
two quondam sovereignties
in into their original
state is capable
of being performed.

There exists no party no person capable of performing any
There exists no person not any person or persons other than the whole aggregate
body of the whole community, excepted, by whom any such restitution
can be so much as called for demanded and claimed. demanded.




Identifier: | JB/104/249/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-07-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 1 - or 3

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

249

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

[[titles::duration of laws - […?] arrangement in relation to it]]

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / d10 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34220

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in