JB/104/300/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/300/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1819 Aug. 18<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
 
<p>8</p>
 
<p>Text resumed</p>
 
<p>So vast is the amplitude capable of <del>being</del> being<lb/>
given to the import of the word forms, that under the wing of<lb/>
it no abuse so mischievous but may find protection. <del>Under</del> <add>Within</add><lb/>
the <del>notion of</del> idea attached to <add>associated with</add> the word <hi rend="underline">Forms</hi>, though the word<lb/>
<del><gap/> is well</del> is commonly added as if it <del><gap/></del> designated something<lb/>
not included under it, is included the idea associated to the word<lb/>
Ceremonies. Ceremonies when <add>in so far as</add> performed by the free consent<lb/>
and concurrence of the people at large are commonly either<lb/>
useful or [at the worst] indifferent <add>or indifferent</add> <add>[matters of indifference]</add>. But when <del><gap/> performed<lb/>
and</del> ordained by government &amp; by a government <add>by</add> which deception<lb/>
is employed and <add><unclear>relied</unclear></add> as an instrument of depredation and oppression<lb/>
they are almost in every <del><gap/></del> instance <add>without exception</add> almost sure<lb/>
to be <del><gap/></del> no less mischievous, than were it not for self-partiality,<lb/>
authority-worship and <del>ancestor-worship</del> ancestor-worship, <add>+</add><lb/>
<note><add>+</add> in Ch Authority<lb/>
worship; Ch. Ancestor<lb/>
-worship</note><lb/>
they would appear <add>be deemed</add> absurd. That, by <del>a man's</del> <add>his</add> having<lb/>
had certain words said over him, a man has been made<lb/>
to hold supernatural intercourses <add>converse</add> with the invisible Almighty<lb/>
<del>and thus</del> his <del>has been rendered</del> nature has been to such<lb/>
a degree changed as that before his <unclear>mandates</unclear>, on condition<lb/>
of his pretending that they were taken from a certain book in<lb/>
which <add>as every body sees</add> no such collections of words are to be found, the understandings<lb/>
and wills of all other men ought, <add>as the present Bishop of London assures his Clergy,</add> to lie prostrate, is<lb/>
<del>a <gap/></del> an imposture that by the help of certain ceremonies<lb/>
has been attempted, and <del>could hard</del> without those instruments<lb/>
of <add>mischievous</add> deception could hardly have been attempted. That by<lb/>
the <del><gap/></del> utterance of certain words, with <sic>cloathes</sic> of a certain<lb/>
form upon his back, it was in a <sic>mans</sic> power to produce<lb/>
rain and <add>or</add> sunshine, or <add>so much as</add> contribute in <del><gap/></del> any the smallest degree<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> contribute to the production of rain <del><gap/></del> and <add>or</add> sunshine is<lb/>
a notion that if <del><gap/></del> observed to be maintained among a <del>set</del> <add>tribe</add> of<lb/>
men with black skins in Africa would be an object of universal<lb/>
scorn and contempt, but which by such statesmen as the authors of<lb/>
this speech <del>would be numbered among</del> <add>is regarded as consecrated by</add> those forms without the observance <note>of which "the Constitution<lb/>
could not be <add><gap/></add> preserved.'</note></p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:16, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 18
Fallacies

8

Text resumed

So vast is the amplitude capable of being being
given to the import of the word forms, that under the wing of
it no abuse so mischievous but may find protection. Under Within
the notion of idea attached to associated with the word Forms, though the word
is well is commonly added as if it designated something
not included under it, is included the idea associated to the word
Ceremonies. Ceremonies when in so far as performed by the free consent
and concurrence of the people at large are commonly either
useful or [at the worst] indifferent or indifferent [matters of indifference]. But when performed
and
ordained by government & by a government by which deception
is employed and relied as an instrument of depredation and oppression
they are almost in every instance without exception almost sure
to be no less mischievous, than were it not for self-partiality,
authority-worship and ancestor-worship ancestor-worship, +
+ in Ch Authority
worship; Ch. Ancestor
-worship

they would appear be deemed absurd. That, by a man's his having
had certain words said over him, a man has been made
to hold supernatural intercourses converse with the invisible Almighty
and thus his has been rendered nature has been to such
a degree changed as that before his mandates, on condition
of his pretending that they were taken from a certain book in
which as every body sees no such collections of words are to be found, the understandings
and wills of all other men ought, as the present Bishop of London assures his Clergy, to lie prostrate, is
a an imposture that by the help of certain ceremonies
has been attempted, and could hard without those instruments
of mischievous deception could hardly have been attempted. That by
the utterance of certain words, with cloathes of a certain
form upon his back, it was in a mans power to produce
rain and or sunshine, or so much as contribute in any the smallest degree
contribute to the production of rain and or sunshine is
a notion that if observed to be maintained among a set tribe of
men with black skins in Africa would be an object of universal
scorn and contempt, but which by such statesmen as the authors of
this speech would be numbered among is regarded as consecrated by those forms without the observance of which "the Constitution
could not be preserved.'




Identifier: | JB/104/300/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1819-08-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

300

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::i&m [with prince of wales feathers above] 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

"text resumed"

ID Number

34271

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in