★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head><gap/> July 1810 + B 1<lb/> | |||
Fallacies</head> | |||
<note>3. <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
Ch. 7. I<gap/> <gap/></note> | |||
<p>1</p> | |||
<p><foreign>Considitur</foreign><lb/> | |||
Outs the same persons as the Ins: but their position differs<lb/> | |||
The d greater a less demand they have for fallacies results from<lb/> | |||
this reference on the position.</p> | |||
<p>Ch. or §. Why among the Ins the use of fallacies is<lb/> | |||
more extensive than among the Outs.</p> | |||
<p>Ch. or §. Why in this work <del><add><gap/></add></del> the largest space is occupied<lb/> | |||
by the Fallacies of the Ins. <gap/> those which occupy<lb/> | |||
the largest space.</p> | |||
<note>1<lb/> | |||
Ins fallacies occupy<lb/> | |||
the largest space.<lb/> | |||
Is not this partiality-<lb/> | |||
fallacy?</note> | |||
<p>By <add>On</add> the base inspection of the list, it will have <add>use observation</add><lb/> | |||
been rendered obvious <add>evident</add> to the reader <add>that will naturally have presented itself to the reader, is</add> that of the three<lb/> | |||
<sic>groupes</sic> into which the general stock of <del><gap/></del> <add>these</add> fallacies<lb/> | |||
has been distributed, the fallacies of the Ins are<lb/> | |||
those which occupy <add>by which is occupied</add> by far the largest <del><gap/></del> space.</p> | |||
<p>On the ground of this observation a natural question<lb/> | |||
seems to be <add>on the part of the reader</add>, to what causes is to be attributed <add>from whence comes comes</add><lb/> | |||
so great a difference <add>disproportion</add>? To one side <add><sic>groupe</sic></add> <add>of the House</add> allotting so<lb/> | |||
large a proportion of space, to the other, as well<lb/> | |||
as to the <del><gap/></del> <sic>groupe</sic> which are employable <add>sometimes</add> indifferently<lb/> | |||
on either side <add>on one side sometimes on the other</add>, so small a <add>an one</add> proportion,<lb/> | |||
is not this disproportion <del>itself</del> a proof of partiality,<lb/> | |||
itself a sort of fallacy?</p> | |||
<p><del>These are questions</del> Question those that seem<lb/> | |||
to call for <add>an</add> answer, [and an answer they shall<lb/> | |||
have]</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
July 1810 + B 1
Fallacies
3.
Ch. 7. I
1
Considitur
Outs the same persons as the Ins: but their position differs
The d greater a less demand they have for fallacies results from
this reference on the position.
Ch. or §. Why among the Ins the use of fallacies is
more extensive than among the Outs.
Ch. or §. Why in this work the largest space is occupied
by the Fallacies of the Ins. those which occupy
the largest space.
1
Ins fallacies occupy
the largest space.
Is not this partiality-
fallacy?
By On the base inspection of the list, it will have use observation
been rendered obvious evident to the reader that will naturally have presented itself to the reader, is that of the three
groupes into which the general stock of these fallacies
has been distributed, the fallacies of the Ins are
those which occupy by which is occupied by far the largest space.
On the ground of this observation a natural question
seems to be on the part of the reader, to what causes is to be attributed from whence comes comes
so great a difference disproportion? To one side groupe of the House allotting so
large a proportion of space, to the other, as well
as to the groupe which are employable sometimes indifferently
on either side on one side sometimes on the other, so small a an one proportion,
is not this disproportion itself a proof of partiality,
itself a sort of fallacy?
These are questions Question those that seem
to call for an answer, [and an answer they shall
have]
|
Identifier: | JB/104/333/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1810-07 |
1 |
||
|
104 |
fallacies |
||
|
333 |
fallacies |
||
|
001 |
why among the ins the use of fallacies is more extensive than among the outs |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
th 1806 |
||
|
andre morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
34304 |
|||
