JB/104/384/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/384/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/104/384/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/104/384/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1 July 1811 6<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
 
<note>V. <foreign>ad superstitionem</foreign><lb/>
Ch. 1. <gap/></note>
 
<p>6</p>
 
<note>13<lb/>
2. For the case where<lb/>
by a succeeding legislator<lb/>
the notice of<lb/>
the immutability of<lb/>
a preceding set of laws<lb/>
has been said to be set<lb/>
up, see <hi rend="underline">post</hi>.</note>
 
<p>2. Of the case in which the notice of the immutability of a set of<lb/>
laws has been said to have <add>spoken of as having</add> been set up by a succeeding <add>succeeding</add><lb/>
legislator an exemplification will be brought to view<lb/>
a little further on [The explanation will require too many <add>occupy too much <del><gap/></del></add><lb/>
words <add>room</add> to find its place here.]</p>
 
<note>14<lb/>
3. <add>For a</add> Case where d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> notice<lb/>
has been set up by<lb/>
a commentator see<lb/>
<sic>Cokes</sic> notice about<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi></note>
 
<p>3. It is to <add>In</add> lawyercraft in the person of an individual<lb/>
lawyer that we must look for <add>may be seen</add> the first exemplification<lb/>
of a conceit <del><gap/></del> so irreconcileable to general utility <add>public welfare</add> and<lb/>
common sense</p>
 
<p><del>Magna Char</del> The Statute or rather <del><gap/></del> the public <add>political</add><lb/>
document called <hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi> is the first, or rather<lb/>
the only Statute <del>to</del> in which the attribute of immutability <add>attributes of indestructibility</add><lb/>
have been endeavoured to be planted by such<lb/>
hands &#x2014; Lord Chief Justice Coke's are the hands by which<lb/>
the <sic>atchievment</sic> was attempted. Of this Statute <add>law</add> such<lb/>
he assures us <add>according to law</add> is the force and virtue that <del><gap/></del> to any<lb/>
<add><gap/></add> future Statute from that time to the end of time should it<lb/>
happen to find itself in contradiction to this eternal<lb/>
standard <add>land-mark</add>, every such Statute would <add>will</add> be void.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:16, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1 July 1811 6
Fallacies

V. ad superstitionem
Ch. 1.

6

13
2. For the case where
by a succeeding legislator
the notice of
the immutability of
a preceding set of laws
has been said to be set
up, see post.

2. Of the case in which the notice of the immutability of a set of
laws has been said to have spoken of as having been set up by a succeeding succeeding
legislator an exemplification will be brought to view
a little further on [The explanation will require too many occupy too much
words room to find its place here.]

14
3. For a Case where do notice
has been set up by
a commentator see
Cokes notice about
Magna Charta

3. It is to In lawyercraft in the person of an individual
lawyer that we must look for may be seen the first exemplification
of a conceit so irreconcileable to general utility public welfare and
common sense

Magna Char The Statute or rather the public political
document called Magna Charta is the first, or rather
the only Statute to in which the attribute of immutability attributes of indestructibility
have been endeavoured to be planted by such
hands — Lord Chief Justice Coke's are the hands by which
the atchievment was attempted. Of this Statute law such
he assures us according to law is the force and virtue that to any
future Statute from that time to the end of time should it
happen to find itself in contradiction to this eternal
standard land-mark, every such Statute would will be void.




Identifier: | JB/104/384/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-07-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

13-14

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

384

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6 / d6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34355

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in