JB/104/408/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/408/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>May 1811<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
 
<note><gap/> <gap/><lb/>
Ch</note>
 
<p>These fallacies will save time in argumentation<lb/>
not <unclear>Eph<gap/> Johns</unclear> only but Ancestor-worship &amp;c</p>
 
<note>Use of this list<lb/>
of fallacies with<lb/>
their respective exposure<lb/>
saving<lb/>
words in debate</note>
 
<p>In argumentation no small quantity of time may<lb/>
be saved to <add>by</add> those who wish to save it. If any <add>one of these</add> instances<lb/>
so it be that the <del>mask</del> <add>veil</add> is sufficiently <sic>stript</sic> <add>torn</add><lb/>
from off the face of the fallacy the trouble of argumentation<lb/>
may be saved by simple reference.</p>
 
<p><add>Can business</add> Argumentation <add>Political altercation</add> might thus be a<gap/> as with as<lb/>
much conciseness as that of juridical pleading was in<lb/>
those early days which Blackstone speaks of.</p>
 
<p>Cut. prt 4.</p>
 
<p>[The net would thus be no sooner thrown, that this hatchet<lb/>
might be taken in hand to cut it.]</p>
 
<p>Stale! stale! This is the Ancestor-worshipper fallacy,<lb/>
or this is the Hobgoblin-criers fallacy &#x2014; and so forth</p>
 
<p>After a reference of this sort, discourse employed<lb/>
in the exposure of the instrument of deception would be a<lb/>
mere waste of words.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:16, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

May 1811
Fallacies


Ch

These fallacies will save time in argumentation
not Eph Johns only but Ancestor-worship &c

Use of this list
of fallacies with
their respective exposure
saving
words in debate

In argumentation no small quantity of time may
be saved to by those who wish to save it. If any one of these instances
so it be that the mask veil is sufficiently stript torn
from off the face of the fallacy the trouble of argumentation
may be saved by simple reference.

Can business Argumentation Political altercation might thus be a as with as
much conciseness as that of juridical pleading was in
those early days which Blackstone speaks of.

Cut. prt 4.

[The net would thus be no sooner thrown, that this hatchet
might be taken in hand to cut it.]

Stale! stale! This is the Ancestor-worshipper fallacy,
or this is the Hobgoblin-criers fallacy — and so forth

After a reference of this sort, discourse employed
in the exposure of the instrument of deception would be a
mere waste of words.




Identifier: | JB/104/408/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

408

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34379

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in