★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
1<lb/> | 1<lb/> | ||
II Ex. 2. Effect prosperity<lb/> | II Ex. 2. Effect prosperity<lb/> | ||
& good government<lb/> | |||
as before obstacle<lb/> | as before obstacle<lb/> | ||
given as a cause, seat<lb/> | given as a cause, seat<lb/> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
he does in the debates<lb/> | he does in the debates<lb/> | ||
or at least attends<lb/> | or at least attends<lb/> | ||
& gives his vote</p> | |||
<p>[<!-- Pointer symbol --> In a Note mention<lb/> | <p>[<!-- Pointer symbol --> In a Note mention<lb/> | ||
Proxies as an abusive<lb/> | |||
mode of taking a part.]</p> | mode of taking a part.]</p> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<p>Answer general feeling<lb/> | <p>Answer general feeling<lb/> | ||
that for men<lb/><lb/> | that for men<lb/> | ||
of that profession<lb/> | |||
legislation & administration<lb/> | legislation & administration<lb/> | ||
are not suitable<lb/> | are not suitable<lb/> | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
for a man who is not<lb/> | for a man who is not<lb/> | ||
at liberty to speak as he<lb/> | at liberty to speak as he<lb/> | ||
thinks; who if arguing<lb/> | |||
on the ground of utility<lb/> | on the ground of utility<lb/> | ||
might be silenced by<lb/> | might be silenced by<lb/> | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
<foreign>1. Improbabilia credenda.<lb/> | <foreign>1. Improbabilia credenda.<lb/> | ||
2. Indefensibilia defendenda.<lb/> | 2. Indefensibilia defendenda.<lb/> | ||
3. Surditas versus | 3. Surditas versus rationem,<lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">officium</hi>: auditio,<lb/> | <hi rend="underline">officium</hi>: auditio,<lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">infamia</hi>.<lb/> | <hi rend="underline">infamia</hi>.<lb/> | ||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
July 1810 B2. Pt. 8. Ch. 6 Sec 3 3
Fallacies B.II Eitherside Part VIII. Judicium Faculty Confounders
Bishops
Cause & obstacle confounders
II
1
II Ex. 2. Effect prosperity
& good government
as before obstacle
given as a cause, seat
of Bishops in the
House of Lords.
P.1.
2.
Proofs that it is
not the cause.
1. In no situation
can a man promote
any business any further
than as he takes
a part in it.
In the H of Lords a
man can not take
a part in the business
any further than
he does in the debates
or at least attends
& gives his vote
[ In a Note mention
Proxies as an abusive
mode of taking a part.]
3. — Bishops, English
26 Irish : speech
by a Bishop a sort
of miracle: attendance
rare except one to read
prayers. p1.
3.
Question 1. Numbers
why so small.
Answer general feeling
that for men
of that profession
legislation & administration
are not suitable
occupations p.2
4.
Question 2. Why not
suitable?
Answer 1. In the Debates
by the personality
fallacies Bishops
eminently vulnerable
1. Apostles Senators or even
Common Councilmen?
2. Did Lazarus or Dives
cloathe himself in purple
& fine linen.
3. By fishing & walking
about to preach would not
you be more like them
than you are? p.2.
---page break---
5
Answer. 2. Feeling
general that the legislature
is not a fit place
for a man who is not
at liberty to speak as he
thinks; who if arguing
on the ground of utility
might be silenced by
reference to 39 Articles
as a text.
6.
Disadvantages under
which a Bishop has
to speak.
1. Improbabilia credenda.
2. Indefensibilia defendenda.
3. Surditas versus rationem,
officium: auditio,
infamia.
4. Partes vulnerabiles
tot propriae.
5 Vincula tot propria.
6. Ad virum ratio
indecora, sicut ad filiam
aut uxorem verta
lasciva.
7.
In vain would it be
for them to contend there
as they so often have done elsewhere
that neither Jesus nor
his Apostles know
what they said that
every thing they said
is to be explained, &
explained away, or explained
to mean the contrary.
[ Add Facienda
1. From the Lords'
Journals collect the members
of Bishops present
each day.
2. From the Debates
observe the topics they
spoke to & the arguments.
3. Note the No of Bishops
brought down to
vote against Romillys
Bills.
4. In proportion as
the defects in the penal
code become apparent so
will the deprabity of these Bishops p.3.
|
Identifier: | JB/104/431/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1810-07 |
1-7 |
||
|
104 |
fallacies |
||
|
431 |
fallacies bii eitherside part viii to the judicial faculty |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 |
||
|
fc1 |
th 1806 |
||
|
andre morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
34402 |
|||
