JB/106/086/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/106/086/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>Feb 7 1807</head>
<head>Feb 7 1807</head>
<note>Judicial Justice<lb/>
Letter V<lb/>
I. <gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del></note>


<p><del>Misdecisi</del><add>The articles of misdecision</add> Prevention of mis-decision and <del>prevention</del><lb/>
<p><del>Misdecisi</del><add>The articles of misdecision</add> Prevention of mis-decision and <del>prevention</del><lb/>
maintenance of uniformity require ulterior consideration.</p>
maintenance of uniformity require ulterior consideration.</p>
<note>4<lb/>
<gap/> consideration<lb/>
<gap/> resulting<lb/>
1. Prevention of misdecision<lb/>
2. Maintenance of uniformity</note>


<p>In regard to misdecision, the mischief of it <del>differs</del><add>differs</add> is<lb/>
<p>In regard to misdecision, the mischief of it <del>differs</del><add>differs</add> is<lb/>
materially, <del>varied by the difference</del><add>whatever be the cause or object of demand</add> according to the nature of<lb/>
materially, <del>varied by the difference</del> <add>whatever be the cause or object of demand</add> according to the nature of<lb/>
the subject of decision. i.e. according as it is the point<add>matter</add> of <lb/>
the subject of decision. i.e. according as it is the point <add>matter</add> of <lb/>
kind in the point<add>matter</add> of fact: the mischief, and thereupon accordingly<lb/>
kind in the point <add>matter</add> of fact: the mischief, and thereupon accordingly<lb/>
the remedy: the mischief viz. in respect of  <lb/>
the remedy: the mischief viz. in respect of  <lb/>
the remedy which it <sic>admitts</sic> of in the one case and act<lb/>
the remedy which it <sic>admitts</sic> of in the one case and act<lb/>
in the other.</p>
in the other.</p>


Where the subject of the decision is the point in question of<lb/>
<note>5<lb/>
<del>fact merely, it</del><add>fact merely <del>more</del> in this case be the state of the law over so uncertain and unengnoscible, it</add> admitts of an ever changing Judge or act of <lb/>
Mischief of misdecision<lb/>
and consequently in <gap/><lb/>
of prevention of<lb/>
misdecision varies<lb/>
according as the subject<lb/>
is matter of fact or<lb/>
law</note>
 
<note>6<lb/>
Subject of decision<lb/>
matter of fact, judication<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> (law were<lb/>
so unrecognisable) may<lb/>
be committed to an <lb/>
everchanging set of Judges<lb/>
such as a Jury; for<lb/>
mischief of misdecision<lb/>
is in this case slight<lb/>
not extending beyond<lb/>
the <gap/> and his circle.<lb/>
Verdict, in one <add>through</add> case<lb/>
but ever so bad, will<lb/>
not be the worse <gap/><lb/>
<gap/>: same July will not sit again</note>
 
 
<p>Where the subject of the decision is the point in question of<lb/>
<del>fact merely, it</del><add>fact merely <del>more</del> in this case be the state of the law over so uncertain and uncognoscible, it</add> admitts of an ever changing Judge or set of <lb/>
Judges: such for example as an English Jury.  In this case<lb/>
Judges: such for example as an English Jury.  In this case<lb/>
the mischief of misdecision is comparatively slight:<add>light:</add> <del>yesterday</del><lb/>
the mischief of misdecision is comparatively slight:<add>light:</add> <del>yesterday</del><lb/>
Line 23: Line 61:
the work of the conscience of the individual, to whose prejudice<lb/>
the work of the conscience of the individual, to whose prejudice<lb/>
the misdecision operates.  <del>Yesterday</del><add>Go back a day</add>, in such or such a cause, <lb/>
the misdecision operates.  <del>Yesterday</del><add>Go back a day</add>, in such or such a cause, <lb/>
a Jury gave <del>an  unjust</del><add>their</add> verdict.
a Jury gave <del>an  unjust</del><add>their</add> verdict. The verdict was unjust, <lb/>
and in that sort of case which exists to no small extent,<lb/>
in which a new trial could not be granted. So much the<lb/>
worse: but however there ends the mischief; at any rate so far <lb/>
as that set of changeable judges is concerned: for the same set<lb/>
will not meet a second time.</p><pb/>
 
 




Line 29: Line 74:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:17, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Feb 7 1807

Judicial Justice
Letter V
I.

MisdecisiThe articles of misdecision Prevention of mis-decision and prevention
maintenance of uniformity require ulterior consideration.

4
consideration
resulting
1. Prevention of misdecision
2. Maintenance of uniformity

In regard to misdecision, the mischief of it differsdiffers is
materially, varied by the difference whatever be the cause or object of demand according to the nature of
the subject of decision. i.e. according as it is the point matter of
kind in the point matter of fact: the mischief, and thereupon accordingly
the remedy: the mischief viz. in respect of
the remedy which it admitts of in the one case and act
in the other.

5
Mischief of misdecision
and consequently in
of prevention of
misdecision varies
according as the subject
is matter of fact or
law

6
Subject of decision
matter of fact, judication
(law were
so unrecognisable) may
be committed to an
everchanging set of Judges
such as a Jury; for
mischief of misdecision
is in this case slight
not extending beyond
the and his circle.
Verdict, in one through case
but ever so bad, will
not be the worse
: same July will not sit again


Where the subject of the decision is the point in question of
fact merely, itfact merely more in this case be the state of the law over so uncertain and uncognoscible, it admitts of an ever changing Judge or set of
Judges: such for example as an English Jury. In this case
the mischief of misdecision is comparatively slight:light: yesterday
the suffering extends not beyond the individual, or at mass beyond
the work of the conscience of the individual, to whose prejudice
the misdecision operates. YesterdayGo back a day, in such or such a cause,
a Jury gave an unjusttheir verdict. The verdict was unjust,
and in that sort of case which exists to no small extent,
in which a new trial could not be granted. So much the
worse: but however there ends the mischief; at any rate so far
as that set of changeable judges is concerned: for the same set
will not meet a second time.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/106/086/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-6

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

086

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34674

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in