JB/106/238/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/238/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<p>Question 1. Why ought no man to be punishable for<lb/>
<p>Question 1. Why ought no man to be punishable for<lb/>
imputing inaptitude to any public functionary?</p>
imputing inaptitude to any public functionary?</p>
<p>Answer. Becuase inaptitude in some degree or <lb/>
<p>Answer. 1. Because inaptitude in some degree or <lb/>
other in some shape or other, is in relation to every
other in some shape or other, is in relation to every<lb/>
situation, but men <del><gap/></del> particularly in relation to every<lb/>
situation, but men <del><gap/></del> particularly in relation to every<lb/>
political situation the lot of every human being: - the<lb/>
political situation the lot of every human being: - the<lb/>
result of the radical and universal imperfection of human<lb/>
result of the radical and universal imperfection of human<lb/>
nature: insomuch that to say of any <del>man that</del><lb/>
nature: insomuch that to say of any <del>man that</del><lb/>
public functionary that<add>in</add> <del>inaptitude</del> in respect of <add>such</add> his<lb/>
public functionary that <add>in</add> <del>inaptitude</del> in respect of <add>such</add> his<lb/>
function inaptitude is not in any shape <add>justly</add> imputable<lb/>
function inaptitude is not in any shape <add>justly</add> imputable<lb/>
to him as much as to say that he not a man,<lb/>
to him is as much as to say that he not a man,<lb/>
but an individual belonging to some species of being<lb/>
but an individual belonging to some species of being<lb/>
distinct from and superior to that of man.</p>
distinct from and superior to that of man.</p>
<p>The functionary <del>A government</del> theefore <del>which be</del> who <del>seeks</del> prohibits or seeks<lb/>
<p>The functionary <del>A government</del> therefore <del>which be</del> who <del>seeks</del> prohibits or seeks<lb/>
to <del>prohibit a</del> cause to be prohibited &amp;c</p>
to <del>prohibit &amp;c</del> cause to be prohibited lest &amp;c<lb/>
<p>declares himself thereby to be - not a man but a being of a nature <note><add>in such <gap/> and design</add> distinct from and superior<lb/>
declares himself thereby to be - not a man but a being of a nature <note><add>in such sort and degree</add> distinct from and superior<lb/>
to the race of manm as<lb/>
to the race of man as<lb/>
not to be liable to fall<lb/>
not to be liable to fall<lb/>
<add>through ignorance or <gap/></add> such error: or else that <add>can<add><unclear>captive</unclear></add></add><lb/>
<add>through ignorance or <gap/></add> into error: or else that <add>can capture</add><lb/>
though be deemed full<lb/>
though be deemed full<lb/>
<gap/> error he is <del><gap/></del> determined<lb/>
<gap/> error he is <del><gap/></del> determined<lb/>
to persevere in it</note></p>
to persevere in it</note></p>
<p>2. If <del>inaptitude neither</del> to the person or persons<lb/>
<p>2. If <del>inaptitu neither</del> to the person or persons<lb/>
<add>by</add>in whose hands the supreme power<del>powers</del> of government is<add>are</add><lb/>
<add>by</add>in whose hands the supreme power<del>powers</del> of government is<add>are</add><lb/>
lodged<add>exercised</add> inaptitude <add>relative inaptitude</add> may not in any shape be imputed,<lb/>
lodged <add>exercised</add> inaptitude <add>relative inaptitude</add> may not in any shape be imputed,<lb/>
the government so constituted is a perfect despotism<lb/>
the government so constituted is a perfect despotism<lb/>
a government <del>to</del> such that to the <add>under it</add> the abuse of its power<lb/>
a government <del>to</del> such that to the <add>under it</add> the abuse of its power<lb/>
howsever mischievous there exists no check, and from<lb/>
howsoever mischievous there exists no check, and <sic>form</sic><lb/>
which the most extreme and mischievous abuses<lb/>
which the most extreme and mischievous abuses <note>Should there be any<add><gap/></add><lb/>
of that pa?? in the word the most <unclear>consuminate</unclear> and<lb/>
man<add>so many men</add> who supposes this<lb/>
destructive tyranny may at all times be <del>with</del> but too<lb/>
<add>each</add> of them of himself, not one<lb/>
will suppose it if any<lb/>
but himself</note><lb/>
of that power in the word the most consummate and<lb/>
destructive tyranny may at all times be <del>well</del> but too<lb/>
reasonably expected.</p>
reasonably expected.</p>
<p>A functionary therefore who prohibits or seeks a cause<lb/>
to be prohibited &amp;c</p>
<p>declares thereby his wish and if possible less intention to <del>uph</del><lb/>
establish or uphold in the hands of the Government of which he is a member <note>-ber a consummate<lb/>
and <del>mad <gap/></del><add><del>perpetual</del> everlasting</add><lb/>
tyrranny.</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:17, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Question 1. Why ought no man to be punishable for
imputing inaptitude to any public functionary?

Answer. 1. Because inaptitude in some degree or
other in some shape or other, is in relation to every
situation, but men particularly in relation to every
political situation the lot of every human being: - the
result of the radical and universal imperfection of human
nature: insomuch that to say of any man that
public functionary that in inaptitude in respect of such his
function inaptitude is not in any shape justly imputable
to him is as much as to say that he not a man,
but an individual belonging to some species of being
distinct from and superior to that of man.

The functionary A government therefore which be who seeks prohibits or seeks
to prohibit &c cause to be prohibited lest &c
declares himself thereby to be - not a man but a being of a nature in such sort and degree distinct from and superior
to the race of man as
not to be liable to fall
through ignorance or into error: or else that can capture
though be deemed full
error he is determined
to persevere in it

2. If inaptitu neither to the person or persons
byin whose hands the supreme powerpowers of government isare
lodged exercised inaptitude relative inaptitude may not in any shape be imputed,
the government so constituted is a perfect despotism
a government to such that to the under it the abuse of its power
howsoever mischievous there exists no check, and form
which the most extreme and mischievous abuses Should there be any
manso many men who supposes this
each of them of himself, not one
will suppose it if any
but himself

of that power in the word the most consummate and
destructive tyranny may at all times be well but too
reasonably expected.

A functionary therefore who prohibits or seeks a cause
to be prohibited &c

declares thereby his wish and if possible less intention to uph
establish or uphold in the hands of the Government of which he is a member -ber a consummate
and mad perpetual everlasting
tyrranny.



Identifier: | JB/106/238/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1817-12-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

3 or 1 - 4 or 2

Box

106

Main Headings

liberty of the press

Folio number

238

Info in main headings field

liberty of the press

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"to jack begin a fresh column here"

ID Number

34826

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in