JB/106/278/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/278/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
<p>would behold themselves exposed at all times to extortion:<lb/>
<p>would behold themselves exposed at all times to extortion:<lb/>
<add>to extortion</add> blind and boundless: they would look to the<lb/>
<add>to extortion</add> blind and boundless: they would look to the<lb/>
Vistula, to the Elbe, to the Rhine: in a word, to all those <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Vistula</hi>, to the <hi rend="underline">Elbe</hi>, to the <hi rend="underline">Rhine</hi>: in a word, to all those <lb/>
water communications, which in Europe run through<lb/>
water communications, which in Europe run through<lb/>
different startes: all this they would look to, and in the <lb/>
different states: all this they would look to, and in the <lb/>
scene of self pernicious selfishness si universally and constantly<lb/>
scene of self pernicious selfishness so universally and constantly<lb/>
exhibited in the old world, would behold evidence but<lb/>
exhibited in the old world, would behold evidence but<lb/>
too conclusive to the like <add>mixture of improbity and </add> and <del>improbity</del> in the New.</p>  
too conclusive of the like <add>mixture of improbity and </add> and <del>improbity</del> in the New.</p>  
<p>To Columbia such virtual hostility could<lb/>
<p>To Columbia such virtual hostility could<lb/>
scarce fail to be in a peculiar degree galling ann irritative.<lb/>
scarce fail to be in a peculiar degree galling and irritative.<lb/>
To Mexico <add>to the exclusion of Columbia</add> the junction would, <del>afford</del><add>in this supposition, give</add> the prodigious<lb/>
To Mexico <add>to the exclusion of Columbia</add> the junction would, <del>afford</del><add>in this Supposition, give</add> the prodigious<lb/>
advantage a of a water communication between <del>their</del><add>her</add> own<lb/>
advantage a of a water communication between <del>their</del><add>her</add> own<lb/>
ports in the Atlantis and her own ports in the Pacific.<lb/>
ports in the Atlantis and her own ports in the Pacific.<lb/>
Line 23: Line 23:
for it on the ever precarious good will of a foreign state,-<lb/>
for it on the ever precarious good will of a foreign state,-<lb/>
the very idea of such a state of things-could it, consistently<lb/>
the very idea of such a state of things-could it, consistently<lb/>
with the nature of man, fail to have invitation for its accompaniment?<lb/>
with the nature of man, fail to have irritation for its accompaniment?<lb/>
While they themselves are confined to the<lb/>
While they themselves are confined to the<lb/>
supremely tedious sea communication round Cape Horn,<lb/>
supremely tedious sea communication round Cape Horn,<lb/>
or the not much less tedious internal communication<lb/>
or the not much less tedious internal communication<lb/>
up the rapid current of the River Magdalen, with a tedious land carriage at the end of it, <add>-</add> the mercantile men of<lb/>
up the rapid current of the River Magdalena, with a tedious <lb/>
land carriage at the end of it, <add>-</add> the mercantile men of<lb/>
that established Republic, with their rulers at their<lb/>
that established Republic, with their rulers at their<lb/>
back, it is in the nature of man they should look with <lb/>
back, it is in the nature of man they should look with <lb/>
Line 34: Line 35:
for throwing them out of the Market?</p>
for throwing them out of the Market?</p>


The Columbians, it is well known to Mexicans, havefor a considerable time past been regarding this jewel with a proprietary eye. After many unexpected delayes, as long ago as February 1822, a Civic Engineer went <del><gap/> <gap/></del> from Europe to make surveys in this view. Exclusion from it would produce in their breasts the sensation of a loss.  In the breasts of the Mexicanm the non-acquisition of it would not prodcue any such sensation as that of loss.  By the acquisition of it m <gap/> equal shares <gap/> on the here proposed partnership footing, the sensation of gain would be produced alike on both sides In
<p>The Columbians, it is well known to Mexicans, <lb/>
have for a considerable time past been regarding<lb/>
this jewel with a proprietary eye. After many unexpected <lb/>
delays, as long ago as February 1822, a Civil Engineer <lb/>
went <del><gap/> <gap/></del> from Europe to make surveys <lb/>
in this view. Exclusion from it would produce in <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">their</hi> breasts the sensation of a loss.  In the breasts of <lb/>
the Mexicans, the <hi rend="underline">non-acquisition</hi> of it would not produce <lb/>
any such sensation as that of loss.  By the acquisition <lb/>
of <add>it, in</add> <del><gap/> an</del> equal shares <del>of it</del> in the here proposed partnership <lb/>
footing, the sensation of gain would be produced alike <lb/>
on both sides.</p>
<p>In</p><pb/>




Line 40: Line 53:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:17, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1822 June 22?
Junctiana Proposal

would behold themselves exposed at all times to extortion:
to extortion blind and boundless: they would look to the
Vistula, to the Elbe, to the Rhine: in a word, to all those
water communications, which in Europe run through
different states: all this they would look to, and in the
scene of self pernicious selfishness so universally and constantly
exhibited in the old world, would behold evidence but
too conclusive of the like mixture of improbity and and improbity in the New.

To Columbia such virtual hostility could
scarce fail to be in a peculiar degree galling and irritative.
To Mexico to the exclusion of Columbia the junction would, affordin this Supposition, give the prodigious
advantage a of a water communication between theirher own
ports in the Atlantis and her own ports in the Pacific.
perMeantime, for this same advantage, in the case of Columbia, the demand
is equally urgent. Suppose Her next neighbour in possession
of it, and herself, for ever, either destitute of it or dependent
for it on the ever precarious good will of a foreign state,-
the very idea of such a state of things-could it, consistently
with the nature of man, fail to have irritation for its accompaniment?
While they themselves are confined to the
supremely tedious sea communication round Cape Horn,
or the not much less tedious internal communication
up the rapid current of the River Magdalena, with a tedious
land carriage at the end of it, - the mercantile men of
that established Republic, with their rulers at their
back, it is in the nature of man they should look with
other than an evil eye, on their rivals in the Mexican State,
if in the exclusive possession of so irresistible an instrument
for throwing them out of the Market?

The Columbians, it is well known to Mexicans,
have for a considerable time past been regarding
this jewel with a proprietary eye. After many unexpected
delays, as long ago as February 1822, a Civil Engineer
went from Europe to make surveys
in this view. Exclusion from it would produce in
their breasts the sensation of a loss. In the breasts of
the Mexicans, the non-acquisition of it would not produce
any such sensation as that of loss. By the acquisition
of it, in an equal shares of it in the here proposed partnership
footing, the sensation of gain would be produced alike
on both sides.

In


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/106/278/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1822-06-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

junctiana proposal

Folio number

278

Info in main headings field

junctiana proposal

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d14 / e7

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

34866

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in