JB/107/015/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/015/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>Style</head>
<head>Style</head>
<p>Superfoetation <add>Ingemination</add> of Epithets without a copula is a fault which Junius gives in to<lb/> It is remarkable that scarce any instances of it are observable in the compositions <add>of the</add> <lb/>Ancients.<lb/> <note>imports either a deficiency in the import of the first, which is to be supplied in the second by addition or an irrelevancy <add>in the first</add> which is to be atoned for in the second by substitution </note> </p>
<p>Superfoetation <add>Ingemination</add> of Epithets without a copula is a fault which Junius gives in to<lb/> It is remarkable that scarce any instances of it are observable in the compositions <add>of the</add> <lb/>Ancients.<lb/>  
<note>imports either a deficiency in the import of the first, which is to be supplied in the second by addition or an irrelevancy <add>in the first</add> which is to be atoned for in the second by substitution </note> </p>


<p>The insertion of the copula between epithets implies a consciousness of <add>that there is a difference</add> <del>a</del> distinction in <add>the</add> <lb/>Ideas which they are used to express and as intention that there should be <lb/> The other implies the intention to convey but a single Idea, to which one of them <gap/> <add>of</add> <lb/>being commensurate, and therefore the other was added by way of supplement to patch up <add>the</add> <lb/>deficiency.<lb/> <note>was <add>by the </add> substitution <add>upon <unclear>ordination</unclear></add> of the second, judged adequate to the first judged inadequate or by the co-ordination to fill up <add>jointly with  </add> <add>in <gap/></add> the measure proposed. <add>kept in view.</add></note> </p>
<p>The insertion of the copula between epithets implies a consciousness of <add>that there is a difference</add> <del>a</del> distinction in <add>the</add> <lb/>Ideas which they are used to express and as intention that there should be <lb/> The other implies the intention to convey but a single Idea, to which one of them <gap/> <add>of</add> <lb/>being commensurate, and therefore the other was added by way of supplement to patch up <add>the</add> <lb/>deficiency.<lb/>  
<note>was <add>by the </add> substitution <add>upon <unclear>ordination</unclear></add> of the second, judged adequate to the first judged inadequate or by the co-ordination to fill up <add>jointly with  </add> <add>in <gap/></add> the measure proposed. <add>kept in view.</add></note> </p>


<p>Over and above Simulation <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>, <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> The exciting Ideas relative to the subject in hand inconsistent with the truth of the writers sentiments ..... which by insertion of words  openly significative of the contrary</note> which is <del>most commonly</del> <add>almost always</add> inconsistent with Virtue, and <add>Dissimulation</add> <lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>||</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>||</hi> The existing of Ideas so inconsistent by the suppression <add><gap/></add> of words which would have restored the consistency.</note> which is frequently: there is another point of prudence, which is without a <add>name</add> <lb/>which consists in the avoiding to <unclear>head</unclear> up <add> <gap/><add>invidious</add></add> questions <add>that are</add> collateral to it, using that choice of <add>words</add><lb/> <add>through the progress of the discourse</add> which shall preserve a neutrality towards all such.</p>   
<p>Over and above Simulation <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi>, <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> The exciting Ideas relative to the subject in hand inconsistent with the truth of the writers sentiments ..... which by insertion of words  openly significative of the contrary</note> which is <del>most commonly</del> <add>almost always</add> inconsistent with Virtue, and <add>Dissimulation</add>  
<lb/>  
<hi rend='superscript'>||</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>||</hi> The existing of Ideas so inconsistent by the <add>intentional</add> suppression of words which would have restored the consistency.</note> which is frequently: there is another point of prudence, which is without a <add>name</add> <lb/>which consists in the avoiding to tread up <add> <gap/> <add>invidious</add></add> questions <add>that are</add> collateral to it, using that choice of <add>words</add><lb/> <add>through the progress of the discourse</add> which shall preserve a neutrality towards all such.</p>   


<p>In this Talent, so necessary to those who touch <add>all whose speculations lead them <add>the <unclear>newer</unclear> of a</add></add> upon points of Politics or <add>under</add> Religion<lb/> an arbitrary Government, it is not to be <sic>wonder'd</sic> if the French particularly <del>exe</del> <lb/> M<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> D'Alembert and the Author of the <foreign>Essai de l'Esprit</foreign>, are models in this <add>way</add> <gap/> <lb/>which would have restored the <sic>cor</sic> <!-- remainder of line seems to have been rubbed away --><lb/> -existence.</p>  
<p>In this Talent, so necessary to those who touch <add>all whose speculations lead them <add>the <unclear>newer</unclear> of a</add></add> upon points of Politics or <add>under</add> Religion<lb/> an arbitrary Government, it is not to be <sic>wonder'd</sic> if the French particularly <del>exe</del> <lb/> M<hi rend='superscript'>s</hi> D'Alembert and the Author of the <foreign>Essai de l'Esprit</foreign>, are models in this <add>way</add> <gap/> <lb/>which would have restored the <sic>cor</sic> <!-- remainder of line seems to have been rubbed away --><lb/> -existence.</p>  
Line 15: Line 19:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:17, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Style

Superfoetation Ingemination of Epithets without a copula is a fault which Junius gives in to
It is remarkable that scarce any instances of it are observable in the compositions of the
Ancients.
imports either a deficiency in the import of the first, which is to be supplied in the second by addition or an irrelevancy in the first which is to be atoned for in the second by substitution

The insertion of the copula between epithets implies a consciousness of that there is a difference a distinction in the
Ideas which they are used to express and as intention that there should be
The other implies the intention to convey but a single Idea, to which one of them of
being commensurate, and therefore the other was added by way of supplement to patch up the
deficiency.
was by the substitution upon ordination of the second, judged adequate to the first judged inadequate or by the co-ordination to fill up jointly with in the measure proposed. kept in view.

Over and above Simulation +, + The exciting Ideas relative to the subject in hand inconsistent with the truth of the writers sentiments ..... which by insertion of words openly significative of the contrary which is most commonly almost always inconsistent with Virtue, and Dissimulation
|| || The existing of Ideas so inconsistent by the intentional suppression of words which would have restored the consistency. which is frequently: there is another point of prudence, which is without a name
which consists in the avoiding to tread up <add>invidious</add> questions that are collateral to it, using that choice of words
through the progress of the discourse which shall preserve a neutrality towards all such.

In this Talent, so necessary to those who touch all whose speculations lead them <add>the newer of a</add> upon points of Politics or under Religion
an arbitrary Government, it is not to be wonder'd if the French particularly exe
Ms D'Alembert and the Author of the Essai de l'Esprit, are models in this way
which would have restored the cor
-existence.

Style Simulation x Dissimulation Epithesi Superfoetatio.



Identifier: | JB/107/015/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

107

Main Headings

Folio number

015

Info in main headings field

style simulation & dissimulation epithetion superfoctatio

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield motif] [gr with crown]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35006

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in