★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p | <p>S.1. p.5. 29 whether<lb/> | ||
it will not be <lb/> | it will not be <lb/> | ||
said that the use<lb/> | said that the use<lb/> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
the oath.</p> | the oath.</p> | ||
<p>A proof that a<lb/> | |||
power is <add>considered as</add> exercised<lb/> | |||
over the will of the<lb/> | |||
Almighty by the<lb/> | |||
performance of the<lb/> | |||
ceremony of the oath<lb/> | |||
is the number of<lb/> | |||
instances in which<lb/> | |||
the mendacity licence<lb/> | |||
is allowed <del>to be</del> &<lb/> | |||
is supposed to be<lb/> | |||
exercised with impunity.</p> | |||
<p>S.6. p.12. Parliaments<lb/> | |||
impotency<lb/> | |||
in respect of mendacity<lb/> | |||
<del><unclear>tracked</unclear></del><lb/> | |||
insisted upon<lb/> | |||
ante 12.</p> | |||
<p>There is very<lb/> | |||
little difference<lb/> | |||
between the employment<lb/> | |||
in judicature<lb/> | |||
of the <del>ceremony of</del><lb/> | |||
<del>an oath or of</del> <lb/> | |||
ordeal or of the<lb/> | |||
ceremony of an oath<lb/> | |||
- there being precisely<lb/> | |||
reason to expect<lb/> | |||
the special interference<lb/> | |||
of the Almighty<lb/> | |||
in the one case as<lb/> | |||
in the other.</p> <pb/> | |||
<p>For the purposes of<lb/> | |||
judication (S. .)<lb/> | |||
Oath is spoken of<lb/> | |||
as inefficient, yet<lb/> | |||
<del>for</del> as a cementing<lb/> | |||
the union of malefactors<lb/> | |||
it is spoken<lb/> | |||
of as highly efficient.<lb/> | |||
(S,8.)</p> | |||
<p><!-- This paragraph has a vertical line down the middle of it -->It is perhaps an<lb/> | |||
account of the reputation<lb/> | |||
the ceremony<lb/> | |||
of an oath requires<lb/> | |||
by being observed to<lb/> | |||
be used on so solemn<lb/> | |||
an occasion as a<lb/> | |||
judicial one, that<lb/> | |||
it acquires the binding<lb/> | |||
force it possesses<lb/> | |||
& thence becomes<lb/> | |||
capable of being<lb/> | |||
used as a means<lb/> | |||
for sanctioning crimes<lb/> | |||
(S.8. p.3)</p> | |||
<p>S.13. 27 whether its<lb/> | |||
antichristianity<lb/> | |||
ought not to stand<lb/> | |||
foremost, that being<lb/> | |||
likely to prove in<lb/> | |||
the eyes of many people<lb/> | |||
the principal objection<lb/> | |||
to it.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
S.1. p.5. 29 whether
it will not be
said that the use
of administering
the oath is to overawe
the witness not
to under the idea
of exercising a power
over the Almighty.
But the answer to
this is, that this
will be known to
the witness, or at
least to most witnesses,
and that they
awe they would
feel would be the
same without as
with the assistance
of the ceremony of
the oath.
A proof that a
power is considered as exercised
over the will of the
Almighty by the
performance of the
ceremony of the oath
is the number of
instances in which
the mendacity licence
is allowed to be &
is supposed to be
exercised with impunity.
S.6. p.12. Parliaments
impotency
in respect of mendacity
tracked
insisted upon
ante 12.
There is very
little difference
between the employment
in judicature
of the ceremony of
an oath or of
ordeal or of the
ceremony of an oath
- there being precisely
reason to expect
the special interference
of the Almighty
in the one case as
in the other.
---page break---
For the purposes of
judication (S. .)
Oath is spoken of
as inefficient, yet
for as a cementing
the union of malefactors
it is spoken
of as highly efficient.
(S,8.)
It is perhaps an
account of the reputation
the ceremony
of an oath requires
by being observed to
be used on so solemn
an occasion as a
judicial one, that
it acquires the binding
force it possesses
& thence becomes
capable of being
used as a means
for sanctioning crimes
(S.8. p.3)
S.13. 27 whether its
antichristianity
ought not to stand
foremost, that being
likely to prove in
the eyes of many people
the principal objection
to it.
Identifier: | JB/107/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
107 |
|||
019 |
|||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
<…>co |
|||
35010 |
|||