JB/107/220/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/107/220/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Peines <hi rend="superscript">1<del>8</del>9</hi></head><!-- headings in pencil -->
<head>Peines <hi rend="superscript">1<del>8</del>9</hi></head><!-- headings in pencil -->


<p><note><!-- note in pencil --><unclear>Paley Deliberated upon</unclear> 10 "The execution of the sentence is <hi rend="underline">deliberated</hi> upon" Meaning not by the King for that is impossible but by the Judge - Which supposes what was just before &amp; is just after pronounced impracticable, that the Judges in words <del>express</del> <unclear>actually</unclear> <unclear>thus</unclear> express the <del>ground on which</del> circumstances calling for capital punishment in each particular instance</note>
<p><note><!-- note in pencil -->Paley Deliberated upon <lb/>10 "The execution of the sentence is <hi rend="underline">deliberated</hi> upon" Meaning not by the King for that is impossible but by the Judge - Which supposes what was just before &amp; is just after pronounced impracticable, that the Judges in words <del>express</del> <unclear>actually</unclear> <unclear>thus</unclear> express the <del>ground on which</del> circumstances calling for capital punishment in each particular instance</note>
<lb/>
"Deliberated upon"? the execution of the sentence<lb/>
"Deliberated upon"? the execution of the sentence<lb/>
deliberated upon? - how and by whom? By the<lb/>
deliberated upon? - how and by whom? By the<lb/>
King <del><unclear>when</unclear></del> alone, conversing with himself alone <add>thinking in his own person</add>? A supposition<lb/>
King <del>when</del> alone, conversing with himself alone <add>thinking in his own person</add>? A supposition<lb/>
so extravagent can hardly have been intended:<lb/>
so extravagant can hardly have been intended:<lb/>
his Majesty. whole time <add>for a task like this, the whole <add>disposable</add> time of this royal <unclear>person</unclear></add> would hardly be sufficient <del>for it</del>.<lb/>
his Majesty. whole time <add>for a task like this, the whole <add>disposable</add> time of this royal person</add> would hardly be sufficient <del>for it</del>.<lb/>
Deliberated upon by persons more than one, Speaking<lb/>
Deliberated upon by persons more than one, Speaking<lb/>
as well as thinking together? If so, observe the consequence.<lb/>
as well as thinking together? If so, observe the consequence.<lb/>
Line 23: Line 24:
by what means is it to be rendered the subject of the<lb/>
by what means is it to be rendered the subject of the<lb/>
deliberation - of the conversation the existence of which<lb/>
deliberation - of the conversation the existence of which<lb/>
<del><unclear>be</unclear> <gap/> for</del> <add><del>is thus <unclear>assumed</unclear></del>, and with so much <add><gap/> a</add> satisfaction contemplated?</add> is so decidedly assumed and so thoroughly<lb/>
<del><unclear>be</unclear> <gap/> for</del> <add><del>is thus assumed</del>, and with so much <add><gap/> a</add> satisfaction contemplated?</add> is so decidedly assumed and so thoroughly<lb/>
approved of? By what means, but by <hi rend="underline">general</hi><lb/>
approved of? By what means, but by <hi rend="underline">general</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">words</hi>, <del>in the same way as <unclear>in</unclear></del> <add><unclear>being</unclear> the same instruments by which in</add> <del>in</del> relation to any other<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">words</hi>, <del>in the same way as <unclear>in</unclear></del> <add><unclear>being</unclear> the same instruments by which in</add> <del>in</del> relation to any other<lb/>
Line 32: Line 33:
perfectly <add><sic>compleatly</sic></add> capable of being expressed: <add>which</add> at the same time<lb/>
perfectly <add><sic>compleatly</sic></add> capable of being expressed: <add>which</add> at the same time<lb/>
in the next preceding page but <unclear>on</unclear> these same circumstances<lb/>
in the next preceding page but <unclear>on</unclear> these same circumstances<lb/>
were as <del><unclear>inexplicably</unclear></del> <add>decidedly and <unclear>insuperably</unclear> -</add> <unclear>inexpressible</unclear>: "circumstances which,<lb/>
were as <del><unclear>inexplicably</unclear></del> <add>decidedly and insuperably -</add> inexpressible: "circumstances which,<lb/>
"however easy to perceive" ...... "it is impossible to enumerate<lb/>
"however easy to perceive" ...... "it is impossible to enumerate<lb/>
"or define."</p>  
"or define."</p>  
Line 39: Line 40:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:18, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

29 Jan 1809 Peines 189

Paley Deliberated upon
10 "The execution of the sentence is deliberated upon" Meaning not by the King for that is impossible but by the Judge - Which supposes what was just before & is just after pronounced impracticable, that the Judges in words express actually thus express the ground on which circumstances calling for capital punishment in each particular instance

"Deliberated upon"? the execution of the sentence
deliberated upon? - how and by whom? By the
King when alone, conversing with himself alone thinking in his own person? A supposition
so extravagant can hardly have been intended:
his Majesty. whole time for a task like this, the whole <add>disposable time of this royal person</add> would hardly be sufficient for it.
Deliberated upon by persons more than one, Speaking
as well as thinking together? If so, observe the consequence.
Of the materials for such thinking, a part, and by the
Reverend Doctor the part first mentioned, consist of the
"general" character of the crimes of those in whose instance
the execution of the this sentence, i.e the question whether
to put them to death or suffer them to live according to law, or save <add>them from it in disobedience to the </add> is thus
taken for the subject of deliberation. But In this
But this "general" character of the crimes in question,
by what means is it to be rendered the subject of the
deliberation - of the conversation the existence of which
be for is thus assumed, and with so much <add> a satisfaction contemplated?</add> is so decidedly assumed and so thoroughly
approved of? By what means, but by general
words, in the same way as in being the same instruments by which in in relation to any other
subject, general ideas are by such as are capable of them wont to be expressed? Here
then, in this page it seems, that the circumstances in
question - viz the circumstances on which the propriety or
impropriety of inflicting capital punishment turns are
perfectly compleatly capable of being expressed: which at the same time
in the next preceding page but on these same circumstances
were as inexplicably decidedly and insuperably - inexpressible: "circumstances which,
"however easy to perceive" ...... "it is impossible to enumerate
"or define."




Identifier: | JB/107/220/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

10

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

220

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e19

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

35211

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in