★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
"Upon this | "Upon this plan" (continues he) it is enough to <hi rend="underline">vindicate</hi><lb/> | ||
the | the lenity of the laws. that <hi rend="underline">some</hi> instances <del>same as</del><lb/> | ||
"the word <hi rend="underline">some</hi> is by <hi rend="underline">him</hi> printed in Italics) are to be found<lb/> | "the word <hi rend="underline">some</hi> is by <hi rend="underline">him</hi> printed in Italics) are to be found<lb/> | ||
"in each class of capital crimes, which | "in each class of capital crimes, which require the restraint<lb/> | ||
"of capital punishment: and that this restraint could<lb/> | "of capital punishment: and that this restraint could<lb/> | ||
"not be applied, without subjecting the whole class to the<lb/> | "not be applied, without subjecting the whole class to the<lb/> | ||
"same condemnation."</p> | "same condemnation."</p> | ||
<p>More looseness of expression, more confusion of<lb/> | <p>More looseness of expression, more confusion of<lb/> | ||
ideas: <add>the</add> looseness <del>of</del><add>in the</add> expression having the confusion in the<lb/> | ideas: <add>the</add> looseness <del>of</del><add>in the</add> expression having the confusion in the<lb/> | ||
ideas for its cause. the design<add>object <del><gap/></del></add> with<add>in</add> which the paragraph<lb/> | ideas for its cause. the design <add>object <del><gap/></del></add> with<add>in</add> which the paragraph<lb/> | ||
commenced being forgotten, and <add>before the conclusion of it</add> another, <del>design</del><lb/> | commenced being forgotten, and <add>before the conclusion of it</add> another, <del>design</del><lb/> | ||
<add>view, </add> the opposite one taken up instead of it.</p> | <add>view, </add> the opposite one taken up instead of it.</p> | ||
The view with which at the commencement of the<lb/> | <p>The view with which at the commencement of the<lb/> | ||
paragraph he started, in the way of suppostition as <del>of</del><lb/> | paragraph he started, in the way of suppostition as <del>of</del><lb/> | ||
charged upon the system, is<add>was</add> the view of "cruelty": and this<lb/> | charged upon the system, is <add>was</add> the view of "cruelty": and this<lb/> | ||
is the charge against which at that period <add>it uses his object</add> he and | is the charge against which at that period <add>it uses his object</add> he and stuck<lb/> | ||
to defend it<add>the defence of it</add>. <del>On this</del> In this view, | to defend it<add>the defence of it</add>. <del>On this</del> In this view, what, on this occasion,<lb/> | ||
supposing any such <unclear>lesser</unclear> <hi rend="underline">word</hi> as the word <unclear>Comity</unclear><lb/> | |||
employed - supposing any such <hi rend="underline">quality</hi> as <hi rend="underline">< | employed - supposing any such <hi rend="underline">quality</hi> as <hi rend="underline"></hi> <unclear>Comity</unclear><lb/> | ||
stated as belonging or not to belonging to the < | stated as belonging or not to belonging to the <unclear>laws</unclear>,<add>it was requisite for him </add> was -<lb/> | ||
to <hi rend="underline">prove</hi>, <add>and produce a persuasion of, </add> the existence of it. Instead of this what<lb/> | to <hi rend="underline">prove</hi>, <add>and produce a persuasion of, </add> the existence of it. Instead of this what<lb/> | ||
does he? he supposes this very quality | does he? he supposes this very quality charged upon<lb/> | ||
the laws as belonging to them, <add>and that</add> in a < | the laws as belonging to them, <add>and that</add> in a <sic>vitious</sic> degree, and<lb/> | ||
<add>for a</add> by way of defence against this charge, undertakes to<lb/> | <add>for a</add> by way of defence against this charge, undertakes to<lb/> | ||
"<hi rend="underline">vindicate</hi>" it: that is, <del>to view</del> admitting <hi rend="underline">now</hi> instead<lb/> | "<hi rend="underline">vindicate</hi>" it: that is, <del>to view</del> admitting <hi rend="underline">now</hi> instead<lb/> | ||
of <hi rend="underline">proving</hi> - admitting <hi rend="underline"><unclear> | of <hi rend="underline">proving</hi> - admitting <hi rend="underline"><unclear>now</unclear></hi> what he had undertaken<lb/> | ||
to prove - | to prove - admitting the existence of <unclear>Comity</unclear> as a quality<lb/> | ||
belonging to those laws<del>,</del> <add>that which</add> what <del>he</del>, in conclusion he sets himself to <note>to make out is - that though it does exist, it does not exist in any such design a can justly be termed <unclear>excessive</unclear>. Quere, how to make sense of this? Answer - by supposing that in saying <hi rend="underline">vindicate</hi> he meant <hi rend="underline">prove</hi>.</note> | belonging to those laws<del>,</del> <add>that which</add> what <del>he</del>, in conclusion he sets himself to <note>to make out is - that though it does exist, it does not exist in any such design a can justly be termed <unclear>excessive</unclear>. Quere, how to make sense of this? Answer - by supposing that in saying <hi rend="underline">vindicate</hi> he meant <hi rend="underline">prove</hi>.</note></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
"Upon this plan" (continues he) it is enough to vindicate
the lenity of the laws. that some instances same as
"the word some is by him printed in Italics) are to be found
"in each class of capital crimes, which require the restraint
"of capital punishment: and that this restraint could
"not be applied, without subjecting the whole class to the
"same condemnation."
More looseness of expression, more confusion of
ideas: the looseness ofin the expression having the confusion in the
ideas for its cause. the design object within which the paragraph
commenced being forgotten, and before the conclusion of it another, design
view, the opposite one taken up instead of it.
The view with which at the commencement of the
paragraph he started, in the way of suppostition as of
charged upon the system, is was the view of "cruelty": and this
is the charge against which at that period it uses his object he and stuck
to defend itthe defence of it. On this In this view, what, on this occasion,
supposing any such lesser word as the word Comity
employed - supposing any such quality as Comity
stated as belonging or not to belonging to the laws,it was requisite for him was -
to prove, and produce a persuasion of, the existence of it. Instead of this what
does he? he supposes this very quality charged upon
the laws as belonging to them, and that in a vitious degree, and
for a by way of defence against this charge, undertakes to
"vindicate" it: that is, to view admitting now instead
of proving - admitting now what he had undertaken
to prove - admitting the existence of Comity as a quality
belonging to those laws, that which what he, in conclusion he sets himself to to make out is - that though it does exist, it does not exist in any such design a can justly be termed excessive. Quere, how to make sense of this? Answer - by supposing that in saying vindicate he meant prove.
|
Identifier: | JB/107/232/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1809-01 |
1 |
||
|
107 |
law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net) |
||
|
232 |
peines paley's net |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e31 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
th 1806 |
||
|
andre morellet |
|||
|
1806 |
|||
|
35223 |
|||
