JB/115/107/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/115/107/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/107/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/107/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<p><!-- indent first word -->The date of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Bentham's Proposal of which the
<lb/>
article in question forms a part, is considerably prior
<lb/>
to the application made of it in both those instances.
<lb/>
Seeing it universally approved and applauded in these
<lb/>
instances it would be matter of no small mortification
<lb/>
to him to find it rejected in an instance in which at
<lb/>
his own risk he has <sic>shewn</sic> so much anxiety to see it
<lb/>
introduced.  Should the Inventor of this species of
<lb/>
security be debarred the faculty of purchasing for
<lb/>
valuable consideration a premium which so many
<lb/>
others in similar situations are called upon to receive
<lb/>
<!-- foreign text checked: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=gratis+definition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a --><foreign>gratis</foreign>, it would be a modern instance of the <!-- foreign text checked: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=sic+vos+non+vobis+meaning&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a --><hi rend='underline'><foreign>Sic vos
<lb/>
non vobis</foreign></hi> , and surely rather an extraordinary one.
<lb/></p>
<p><!-- indent first word -->Will it be seriously apprehended that under the
<lb/>
influence of such a preservative Prisoners may not
<lb/>
die fast enough in the Prison ?  Should no mortal
<lb/>
ever die there Government know the worst: two or three
<lb/>
thousand a year is not too much to pay for a receipt
<lb/>
for immortality.
<lb/></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:21, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


The date of Mr Bentham's Proposal of which the
article in question forms a part, is considerably prior
to the application made of it in both those instances.
Seeing it universally approved and applauded in these
instances it would be matter of no small mortification
to him to find it rejected in an instance in which at
his own risk he has shewn so much anxiety to see it
introduced. Should the Inventor of this species of
security be debarred the faculty of purchasing for
valuable consideration a premium which so many
others in similar situations are called upon to receive
gratis, it would be a modern instance of the Sic vos
non vobis
, and surely rather an extraordinary one.

Will it be seriously apprehended that under the
influence of such a preservative Prisoners may not
die fast enough in the Prison ? Should no mortal
ever die there Government know the worst: two or three
thousand a year is not too much to pay for a receipt
for immortality.




Identifier: | JB/115/107/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115.

Date_1

1795-06-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

115

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

reasons for retaining the article relative to the insuring of the lives of the prisoners

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

3

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37482

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in