JB/115/116/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/115/116/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


obtained <del>for nothing</del> by government for nothing.<lb/> Such is the hardship to Government upon this score.<lb/> What would <add><del>there have been to pay</del></add> Government have had to pay, if it had<lb/> gone to work <add>and built</add> <del>building</del> <add>a Penitentiary House</add> for these supernumeraries<lb/> upon the common plan? <del>It could not</del> A second<lb/> Penitentiary House could not be built for one half<lb/> a dozen or a dozen supernumeraries as they<lb/> happen to be brought in: <del>it must be built</del><lb/> and upon the common plans not a single supernumerary <del>can</del> could be taken in to the first house,<lb/> <del>It</del> <add>The second</add> must be built for the greatest probably number,<lb/> say <del><!-- pound symbol --></del> 1,000. With the benefit of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> <sic>Blackburne's</sic><lb/> frugality a Penitentiary House <add>for a thousand</add> could<lb/>
<p>obtained <del>for nothing</del> by government for nothing.<lb/> Such is the hardship to Government upon this score.<lb/> What would <add><del>there have been to pay</del></add> Government have had to pay, if it had<lb/> gone to work <add>and built</add> <del>building</del> <add>a Penitentiary House</add> for these supernumeraries<lb/> upon the common plan? <del>It could not</del> A second<lb/> Penitentiary House could not be built for one half<lb/> a dozen or a dozen supernumeraries as they<lb/> happen to be brought in: <del>it must be built</del><lb/> and upon the common plans not a single supernumerary <del>can</del> could be taken in to the first house,<lb/> <del>It</del> <add>The second</add> must be built for the greatest probable number,<lb/> say <del><!-- pound symbol --></del> 1,000. With the benefit of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> <sic>Blackburne's</sic><lb/> frugality a Penitentiary House <add>for a thousand</add> could<lb/> not be had for as little as <!-- pound symbol -->200,000. <del>Say</del><lb/> It might now be had say for <!-- pound symbol -->100,000.<lb/> But for one reason or other, <add>such as diminution in the<lb/> number of criminals</add><del>improvement of <gap/><lb/> morals</del>, improvement of the County Prisons, <unclear>intrusion</unclear><lb/> of the Colony plan, or adoption of some other mode<lb/> of disposing of convicts) perhaps not above<lb/> 5000 are received into this <!-- pound symbol -->100,000 House.<lb/> What is the consequence? That for each <del>man</del><lb/> convict House-rent alone (at <add><!-- pound symbol -->1,000</add> <!-- pound symbol -->5 per cent)<lb/> comes to <!-- pound symbol -->150 a year. In M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Bentham's plan<lb/> it comes to <!-- pound symbol -->9 a year <add>and that</add> for two years only. </p>
 
 




Line 26: Line 24:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:21, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

obtained for nothing by government for nothing.
Such is the hardship to Government upon this score.
What would there have been to pay Government have had to pay, if it had
gone to work and built building a Penitentiary House for these supernumeraries
upon the common plan? It could not A second
Penitentiary House could not be built for one half
a dozen or a dozen supernumeraries as they
happen to be brought in: it must be built
and upon the common plans not a single supernumerary can could be taken in to the first house,
It The second must be built for the greatest probable number,
say 1,000. With the benefit of Mr Blackburne's
frugality a Penitentiary House for a thousand could
not be had for as little as 200,000. Say
It might now be had say for 100,000.
But for one reason or other, such as diminution in the
number of criminals
improvement of
morals
, improvement of the County Prisons, intrusion
of the Colony plan, or adoption of some other mode
of disposing of convicts) perhaps not above
5000 are received into this 100,000 House.
What is the consequence? That for each man
convict House-rent alone (at 1,000 5 per cent)
comes to 150 a year. In Mr Bentham's plan
it comes to 9 a year and that for two years only.












Identifier: | JB/115/116/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

115

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

116

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37491

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in