JB/116/046/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/046/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


New York; 1802: Eddy,<lb/><note>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 3<lb/></note><lb/>Page 58. "It is certain also, that under the present system of<lb/>"punishment, a much less number of offenders escape conviction.<lb/>"<hi rend='underline'>Individuals do not</hi>, from a sense of the terrible consequences to the<lb/>"party, <hi rend='underline'>refuse to prosecute</hi>; nor <hi rend='underline'>juries</hi>, from motives of compassion,<lb/>"<hi rend='underline'>forbear to convict</hi> the guilty. This is a most salutary consequence<lb/>"of the amelioration of our general laws &#x2014;<lb/><lb/>Philadelphia<lb/><note>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 1</note> <del><gap/></del>, 1793: <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>. "Juries are not now unwilling to<lb/>"convict; and pardons are not granted till they [the prisoners]<lb/>"<gap/> some appearances of amendment.  
<head>Letter 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> or 3</head>
 
<p><note>XIII Crimes <gap/> Death. <del>XV D</del> Crimes <gap/> Prosecution ready</note> New York; 1802: Eddy,<lb/><note>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 3<lb/></note><lb/>Page 58. "It is certain also, that under the present system of <lb/>"punishment, a much less number of offenders escape conviction.<lb/>"<hi rend='underline'>Individuals do not</hi>, from a sense of the terrible consequences to the<lb/>"party, <hi rend='underline'>refuse to prosecute</hi>; nor <hi rend='underline'>juries</hi>, from motives of compassion,<lb/>"<hi rend='underline'>forbear to convict</hi> the guilty. This is a most salutary consequence<lb/>"of the amelioration of our penallaws &#x2014;</p>
 
 
<p><note>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 1</note> <del><gap/>;</del> <add>Philadelphia</add> 1793: <gap/> p. 92. "Juries are not now unwilling to<lb/>"convict; and pardons are not granted till they [the prisoners]<lb/>"discover some appearances of amendment. <note>the <gap/> <gap/> of it <gap/> spoken of</note></p>
 
<p><note>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 2</note> Philadelphia; 1795. Liancourt, p. 29. "Juries, who naturally feel<lb/>"repugnant to the punishment of death, &amp; incline rather to doubt <note>a few <unclear>comments</unclear> which every <gap/> be left without is <gap/> of:</note><lb/>"of, than add strength to the evidence adduced, when they find, as is<lb/>"now the case, the punishment proportioned to the crime, and<lb/>"are convinced of the utility of the scheme, will be less averse<lb/>"to investigate &amp; and admit the proofs of guilt. The executive also<lb/>"has no sufficient motive to pardon a convict previous to the<lb/>"execution of his sentence, since at any time he has the power<lb/>"of doing it, after the criminal has demonstrated that he is<lb/>"worthy of the indulgence. <hi rend='underline'>This certainty of punishment has</hi><lb/><hi rend='underline'>"already proved a great check upon criminality".</hi></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Letter 2d or 3

XIII Crimes Death. XV D Crimes Prosecution ready New York; 1802: Eddy,
No 3

Page 58. "It is certain also, that under the present system of
"punishment, a much less number of offenders escape conviction.
"Individuals do not, from a sense of the terrible consequences to the
"party, refuse to prosecute; nor juries, from motives of compassion,
"forbear to convict the guilty. This is a most salutary consequence
"of the amelioration of our penallaws —


No 1 ; Philadelphia 1793: p. 92. "Juries are not now unwilling to
"convict; and pardons are not granted till they [the prisoners]
"discover some appearances of amendment. the of it spoken of

No 2 Philadelphia; 1795. Liancourt, p. 29. "Juries, who naturally feel
"repugnant to the punishment of death, & incline rather to doubt a few comments which every be left without is of:
"of, than add strength to the evidence adduced, when they find, as is
"now the case, the punishment proportioned to the crime, and
"are convinced of the utility of the scheme, will be less averse
"to investigate & and admit the proofs of guilt. The executive also
"has no sufficient motive to pardon a convict previous to the
"execution of his sentence, since at any time he has the power
"of doing it, after the criminal has demonstrated that he is
"worthy of the indulgence. This certainty of punishment has
"already proved a great check upon criminality".




Identifier: | JB/116/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

letter 2d or 3

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f90

Penner

jeremy bentham; john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham; john herbert koe

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37579

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in