JB/116/133/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/133/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<p>But I must not run on yet to <hi rend='underline'>causes</hi>: I have<lb/> not <del>done yet with</del> <add>spoken yet of</add> <hi rend='underline'>consequences</hi>. </p>
<p>But I must not run on yet to <hi rend='underline'>causes</hi>: I have<lb/> not <del>done yet with</del> <add>spoken yet of</add> <hi rend='underline'>consequences</hi>. </p>


<p><add>On</add>Turning over the Journal of the Judge Advocate, I <lb/>observe trains of <del>about</del> <add>may be seen</add> a number of Ordinances 68 or<lb/> thereabouts issued between <del>1</del> 1787 and October 1796<lb/> in the compass of about <add>more:</add> nine years. These Ordinances <lb/>were legal or illegal according to the quality of <add>live</add> <del>live<lb/> persons </del> <add>descriptions of persons &#x2014; those</add> on whom active <gap/> the obligation was <add>respectively</add> imposed<lb/> by them and <del>asked</del> those whose <gap/> <gap/> were<lb/> wrought upon and assisted by them.</p>
<p><add>On</add>Turning over the Journal of the Judge Advocate, I <lb/>observe trains of <del>about</del> <add>may be seen</add> a number of Ordinances 68 or<lb/> thereabouts issued between <del>1</del> 1787 and October 1796<lb/> in the compass of about <add>more:</add> nine years. These Ordinances <lb/>were legal or illegal according to the quality of <add>live</add> <del>live<lb/> persons </del> <add>descriptions of persons &#x2014; those</add> on whose  active faculties the obligation was <add>respectively</add> imposed<lb/> by them and <del>accord</del> those whose passive  faculties were<lb/> wrought upon and assisted by them.</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p>1. They may have been legal so far as the party bound<lb/> and the party affected by them were the same or though<lb/> different both belonging to <add>included in</add> to the class of unemancipated Bondsmen </p>
<p>2. They may have been legal in so far as both parties<lb/> being of <add>appertaining to </add> the class of level officers or subordinate Agents<lb/> of Government under the Governor the obligation in both ways<lb/> was confined within the sphere of subjection marked out<lb/> by the <add>nature and</add> duties of their respective offices. </p>


<p>3. They may have been legal <del>in so</del> within the same <lb/> <unclear>translations</unclear> in the case of Officers of the Military class &#x2014; <del>Naval</del> <add>Sea</add> <lb/>as well as land service included &#x2014; supposing the powers <lb/>received from the Governors commission to have stretched to <lb/>that extreme. </p>


<p>To save <del><sic>enquiry</sic></del> <add>description</add> I will take these legality for granted <lb/>in the case of <add>the commanders and crews of</add> foreign vessels &#x2014; and even in the case of <lb/><add>the Commanders and crews of</add> private vessels such as those in which the Convicts <add>or <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi></add> <note>or other <del>men</del> or goods for the use of the Colony</note> were <lb/><add>imported into the Colony</add> brought out by contract so long as they continued on board, <lb/>or <del>were to</del> so far as the refusal of permission <add>depended on the <unclear>promise</unclear> of</add> to come or <gap/><lb/> upon the land. </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

26 June 1802 B. 5
N. S. Wales 18
1

But I must not run on yet to causes: I have
not done yet with spoken yet of consequences.

OnTurning over the Journal of the Judge Advocate, I
observe trains of about may be seen a number of Ordinances 68 or
thereabouts issued between 1 1787 and October 1796
in the compass of about more: nine years. These Ordinances
were legal or illegal according to the quality of live live
persons
descriptions of persons — those on whose active faculties the obligation was respectively imposed
by them and accord those whose passive faculties were
wrought upon and assisted by them.

1. They may have been legal so far as the party bound
and the party affected by them were the same or though
different both belonging to included in to the class of unemancipated Bondsmen

2. They may have been legal in so far as both parties
being of appertaining to the class of level officers or subordinate Agents
of Government under the Governor the obligation in both ways
was confined within the sphere of subjection marked out
by the nature and duties of their respective offices.

3. They may have been legal in so within the same
translations in the case of Officers of the Military class — Naval Sea
as well as land service included — supposing the powers
received from the Governors commission to have stretched to
that extreme.

To save enquiry description I will take these legality for granted
in the case of the commanders and crews of foreign vessels — and even in the case of
the Commanders and crews of private vessels such as those in which the Convicts or + or other men or goods for the use of the Colony were
imported into the Colony brought out by contract so long as they continued on board,
or were to so far as the refusal of permission depended on the promise of to come or
upon the land.




Identifier: | JB/116/133/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

133

Info in main headings field

extracts from the case of hall v campbell

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

john herbert koe

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37666

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in