JB/116/171/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/171/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>13 July 1802 6</head>
<head>13 July 1802 6</head>
<head>N. S. Wales </head>
<head>N. S. Wales </head>
<head>3</head>
<note>3</note>
<note>Conduct<lb/>
<gap/> Samples</note>


<p><del>distilling of spirits</del> &#x2014; distillation of spirits &#x2014; <del>was the sale</del> <lb/>were they silent in the subject of sale<del>?</del> of spirits? <lb/><del>were th</del> was it confined to that of distillation? It may<lb/> be so: but it is more than I should have expected. To <lb/>suppose <del>t at</del> <add>any thing</add> possible which as yet has not <add>been known to have</add> happened <lb/>is a stretch of thought <del>such as I should not have</del> <add>beyond any thing of which I could</add> <lb/><del>re</del> have suspected his Majesty. Ministers if that have not to speak of <unclear>others.</unclear> </p>
<p><del>distilling of spirits</del> &#x2014; distillation of spirits &#x2014; <del>was the sale</del> <lb/>were they silent in the subject of sale<del>?</del> of spirits? <lb/><del>were th</del> was it confined to that of distillation? It may<lb/> be so: but it is more than I should have expected. To <lb/>suppose <del>t at</del> <add>any thing</add> possible which as yet has not <add>been known to have</add> happened <lb/>is a stretch of thought <del>such as I should not have</del> <add>beyond any thing of which I could</add> <lb/><del>re</del> have suspected his Majesty. Ministers if that have not<lb/> to speak of <unclear>others.</unclear> </p>


<p>Such were my reflections &#x2014; before I had come to the <add>next</add> whole. <lb/><del>which with mat</del></p>
<p>Such were my reflections &#x2014; before I had come to the <add>next</add> whole. <lb/><del>which with mat</del></p>


<p>Proof of utility were <add>not</add> of the <gap/> <del><hi rend="underline">opposite to</hi> that</del> <lb/><del>which was</del> <add>actually</add> taken in the present instance <add>but of its opposite! ..</add> From the very <lb/>"frequent state of intoxication in which treat numbers ..<lb/> "<del>of the</del> had for some time past been seen, there was reason <lb/><del>th</del> "to suspect that a greater quantity of spirituous liquors <lb/>"had been landed from the different ships which had entered<lb/> "this port than formerly had been obtained for ...<lb/>  <note>The <gap/> could not have been better, had the contrivance been by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose, and the wording by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt.</note> &#x2014; it became highly necessary to put a def. as early as possible<lb/> "to a practice which was pregnant with all kinds of <lb/>"mischief: </p>
<p>Proof of utility were <add>not</add> of the measure <del><hi rend="underline">opposite to</hi> that</del> <lb/><del>which was</del> <add>actually</add> taken in the present instance <add>but of its opposite! ..</add> From the very <lb/>"frequent state of intoxication in which great numbers ..<lb/> "<del>of the</del> had for some time past been seen, there was reason <lb/><del>th</del> "to suspect that a greater quantity of spirituous liquors <lb/>"had been landed from the different ships which had entered<lb/> "this port than formerly had been obtained for ...<lb/>  <note>The <gap/> could not have been better, had the contrivance been by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Rose, and the wording by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt.</note> &#x2014; it became highly necessary to put a def. as early as possible<lb/> "to a practice which was pregnant with all kinds of <lb/>"mischief: </p>


<p>Proof of illegality. In Great Britain it is certainly no<lb/> more of a "<hi rend="underline">misbehaviour</hi>" than it is of an "<hi rend="underline">outrage</hi>" to <del>barter</del> <lb/>exchange corn for spirits. Nor would it be a ground for refusing<lb/> a <gap/> for the sale of <add>trade in</add> spirits, much less for revoking<lb/> one when <add>already</add> granted: granted, and that <add>to last</add> for a whole twelvemonth
<p>Proof of illegality. In Great Britain it is certainly no<lb/> more of a "<hi rend="underline">misbehaviour</hi>" than it is of an "<hi rend="underline">outrage</hi>" to <del>barter</del> <lb/>exchange corn for spirits. Nor would it be a ground for refusing<lb/> a licence for the sale of <add>trade in</add> spirits, much less for revoking<lb/> one when <add>already</add> granted: granted, and that <add>to last</add> for a whole twelvemonth
<lb/> instead of being revoked by an unexpected stretch of power<lb/> <del>at the end</del> of before two months were at an end. </p>
<lb/> instead of being revoked by an unexpected stretch of power<lb/> <del>at the end</del> of before two months were at an end. </p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

13 July 1802 6 N. S. Wales 3 Conduct
Samples

distilling of spirits — distillation of spirits — was the sale
were they silent in the subject of sale? of spirits?
were th was it confined to that of distillation? It may
be so: but it is more than I should have expected. To
suppose t at any thing possible which as yet has not been known to have happened
is a stretch of thought such as I should not have beyond any thing of which I could
re have suspected his Majesty. Ministers if that have not
to speak of others.

Such were my reflections — before I had come to the next whole.
which with mat

Proof of utility were not of the measure opposite to that
which was actually taken in the present instance but of its opposite! .. From the very
"frequent state of intoxication in which great numbers ..
"of the had for some time past been seen, there was reason
th "to suspect that a greater quantity of spirituous liquors
"had been landed from the different ships which had entered
"this port than formerly had been obtained for ...
The could not have been better, had the contrivance been by Mr Rose, and the wording by Mr Pitt. — it became highly necessary to put a def. as early as possible
"to a practice which was pregnant with all kinds of
"mischief:

Proof of illegality. In Great Britain it is certainly no
more of a "misbehaviour" than it is of an "outrage" to barter
exchange corn for spirits. Nor would it be a ground for refusing
a licence for the sale of trade in spirits, much less for revoking
one when already granted: granted, and that to last for a whole twelvemonth
instead of being revoked by an unexpected stretch of power
at the end of before two months were at an end.



Identifier: | JB/116/171/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

171

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37704

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in