JB/116/173/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/173/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


28-Oct-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.


<head>13 July 1802<!-- aligned to the left-hand margin --> <!-- white space --> 8<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin --></head><!-- all in pencil -->
<head>13 July 1802<!-- aligned to the left-hand margin --> <!-- white space --> 8<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin --></head><!-- all in pencil -->
<head>N. S. Wales  <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- heading and note in pencil -->
<head>N. S. Wales  <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- heading and note in pencil -->


<head>2<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin, and in pencil --><note>IV . Samples  Drunkenness  5</note></head><!-- note in pencil -->
<head>2<!-- aligned to the right-hand margin, and in pencil --><note>IV. Samples  Drunkenness  5</note></head><!-- note in pencil -->
<p><!-- indented -->Thus far Captain Collins ,  What status me on the
 
<p><!-- indented -->Thus far Captain Collins,  What status me <del>on</del> the
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>subject , is &#x2014; that</del> probable effect of this new law is
<del>subject, is &#x2014; that</del> probable effect of this new law is
<lb/>
<lb/>
the introducing into the <gap/> in question certain formalities ,
the introducing into the <sic>traffick</sic> in question certain formalities,
<lb/>
<lb/>
or perhaps in instances or <gap/> of <gap/>
or perhaps in some instances or sort of curiosity
<lb/>
<lb/>
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise : but
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise: but
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>how the <del>greater</del> consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can <gap/>.</add>  The owner of the grain would sell it to the <del><gap/></del> <add>Gin-shop</add> pub <add>keeper</add>
<add>how the <del>greater</del> consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can see.</add>  The owner of the grain would sell it to the <del><gap/></del> <add>Gin-shop keeper</add> pub
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> for <add><del>the</del></add> money : <del>and <gap/></del> <add><del><gap/></del></add>  In would <del><gap/></del> <add>have</add> the
<del>-lican</del> for <add><del>the</del></add> money: <del>and <gap/><!-- 'instate tis' --></del> <add><del>was <gap/></del></add>  he would <del>give</del> <add>have</add> the
<lb/>
<lb/>
money <add>to give</add> for the <gap/> .  <add>Which <gap/></add>  That the money should be <del>particularly</del> <add>of the very
money <add>to give</add> for the gin.  <add>Which <gap/></add>  That the money should be <del>particularly</del> <add>of the very
<lb/>
<lb/>
first goodness</add> <del>good</del> would not on <del>this</del> <add>such an</add> occasion be <del>absolutely</del> <add>altogether</add> necessary .
first goodness</add> <del>good</del> would not on <del>this</del> <add>such an</add> occasion be <del>absolutely</del> <add>altogether</add> necessary.
<lb/>
<lb/>
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough ,
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough,
<lb/>
<lb/>
in the shape <gap/><!-- addition from beneath ? --> of any thing called money , for this ceremony , the
in the shape of any thing called money, for this ceremony, the
<lb/>
<lb/>
<gap/> would then have to sell the grain to somebody
<unclear>comediater</unclear> would then have to sell the grain to somebody
<lb/>
<lb/>
else in the first instance , in order to get the money - which
else in the first instance, in order to get the money - which
<lb/>
<lb/>
got , he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper   
got, he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper   
<lb/>
<lb/>
who would then have the capital to go on upon , as above.
who would then have the capital to go in upon, as above.
<lb/></p>
 
<p><!-- indented -->The simple way <add>course</add> I still think, would have been
<lb/>
to <add>have</add> prevented the existence of the <del>p</del> prison by <del>stopping</del> <add>preventing</add>
<lb/>
as well the introduction as the fabrication of it.  If <del>both</del> <add>both</add>
<lb/>
could not be prevented or if neither could, <add>by</add> what <del>could</del>
<lb/>
others course could the matter be mended?  So much
<lb/>
no existed, so much would be drink: more could not
<lb/>
be; and being drunk, what mattered it by whom
<lb/>
drank or by whom sold?  by a sinning publican,
<lb/>
or by a publican who was not a sinner?
<lb/></p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Line 43: Line 100:




<lb/></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


13 July 1802 8 N. S. Wales Conduct

2IV. Samples Drunkenness 5

Thus far Captain Collins, What status me on the
subject, is — that probable effect of this new law is
the introducing into the traffick in question certain formalities,
or perhaps in some instances or sort of curiosity
with which it would not have been incumbered otherwise: but
how the greater consumption should be lessened by any such means is more than I can see. The owner of the grain would sell it to the Gin-shop keeper pub
-lican for the money: and was he would give have the
money to give for the gin. Which That the money should be particularly of the very
first goodness
good would not on this such an occasion be absolutely altogether necessary.
If the gin shop-keeper could not command capital enough,
in the shape of any thing called money, for this ceremony, the
comediater would then have to sell the grain to somebody
else in the first instance, in order to get the money - which
got, he might go boldly with it to the gin shop keeper
who would then have the capital to go in upon, as above.

The simple way course I still think, would have been
to have prevented the existence of the p prison by stopping preventing
as well the introduction as the fabrication of it. If both both
could not be prevented or if neither could, by what could
others course could the matter be mended? So much
no existed, so much would be drink: more could not
be; and being drunk, what mattered it by whom
drank or by whom sold? by a sinning publican,
or by a publican who was not a sinner?

























Identifier: | JB/116/173/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

173

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37706

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in