JB/116/214/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/214/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/214/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/214/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>28 June 1802 43<lb/> N. S. Wales</head>


<p>In the fiction thus <sic>employd</sic> (if it be <sic>employd</sic>, and <lb/>unless it be not so much as the colour of <del>th</del> law can be given<lb/> in the whole management) In the fiction thus <sic>employd</sic>, we <lb/>see another <add>and very material</add> fraud put by <hi rend='superscript'>[++]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[++]</hi> the Pitt and <gap/> Administration</note> <add>the <add>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt</add></add> Administration of that day upon<lb/> Parliament. I have <del>a</del> already <del>explained</del> <add>represented</add> to Your<lb/> Lordship how wide the difference is between <del>transportation</del> <add><del>bondage</del></add> <lb/>transportation bondage on the old footing, and transportation<lb/> bondage under this new footing: how completely different<lb/> the situation of <del>all</del> <add>both</add> parties concerned &#x2014; the Council<lb/> and the public here at home is in the two cases: how<lb/> natural an effect reformation is in the former case &#x2014; how <lb/>near to impossible in the latter. Nothing can be <del>a</del> more<lb/> widely different in principle and effect, than interested<lb/> management and trust - management. In the case of<lb/> interested management the manager has the <del>greatest</del> <add>strongest idea <add><del>degree</del></add> sort of</add> personal<lb/> interest possible in the success of the management: in the<lb/> case of <del>can</del> trust - management, he has little or none. <add>is supposed at least to have none.</add> Then <lb/>Under the old system the stock of all kinds of which the <lb/>labour of the Convict - Bondsman formed a part, was the<lb/> property of the Purchasing Master &#x2014; his management of it <lb/>consequently - being for his own use and <gap/> was of the <lb/>intrusted kind. Under the new system that same stock &#x2014; <lb/>that same labour is <del>under</del> the property of the state &#x2014; put<lb/> under the management of the Governor &#x2014; in whose situation <lb/>it will naturally be a point of honour to have<lb/> nothing to do <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> in appearance at least</note> with <del>that</del> <add>any</add> sort of motive to which <del>the</del> any <lb/><add>such</add> appellation <add>as that</add> of personal interest is wont to be applied <lb/>in common language.  </p> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

28 June 1802 43
N. S. Wales

In the fiction thus employd (if it be employd, and
unless it be not so much as the colour of th law can be given
in the whole management) In the fiction thus employd, we
see another and very material fraud put by [++] [++] the Pitt and Administration the <add>Mr Pitt</add> Administration of that day upon
Parliament. I have a already explained represented to Your
Lordship how wide the difference is between transportation bondage
transportation bondage on the old footing, and transportation
bondage under this new footing: how completely different
the situation of all both parties concerned — the Council
and the public here at home is in the two cases: how
natural an effect reformation is in the former case — how
near to impossible in the latter. Nothing can be a more
widely different in principle and effect, than interested
management and trust - management. In the case of
interested management the manager has the greatest strongest idea <add>degree sort of</add> personal
interest possible in the success of the management: in the
case of can trust - management, he has little or none. is supposed at least to have none. Then
Under the old system the stock of all kinds of which the
labour of the Convict - Bondsman formed a part, was the
property of the Purchasing Master — his management of it
consequently - being for his own use and was of the
intrusted kind. Under the new system that same stock —
that same labour is under the property of the state — put
under the management of the Governor — in whose situation
it will naturally be a point of honour to have
nothing to do [+] [+] in appearance at least with that any sort of motive to which the any
such appellation as that of personal interest is wont to be applied
in common language.




Identifier: | JB/116/214/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-06-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

214

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e8 / f43

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37747

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in