★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<head>3</head> | <head>3</head> | ||
<note>6. Conduct 3.Convict Let. continued.</note> | <note>6. Conduct<lb/> 3.Convict Let.<lb/> continued.</note> | ||
<p>Be this as it may — [spite of the difficulty which <lb/>an <del>u</del> idea, in any degree divergent from the routine of common <lb/>place, experiences in its endeavours <add>is | <p>Be this as it may — [spite of the difficulty which <lb/>an <del>u</del> idea, in any degree divergent from the routine of common <lb/>place, experiences in its endeavours <add>is doomed to experience</add> to place itself in <lb/>the neighborhood of a declaiming tongue] so it is <add>happens</add> that <lb/>by one means or another, in the year 1794 if not before <lb/>the difference between interested management, and trust management <lb/>was not altogether a <unclear>secret</unclear> to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt. Not <lb/>only so but at that time <del>all th and</del> (how long before I <lb/>can not pretend <add>take upon me</add> to say) it was sufficiently understood <lb/>that a law authorizing administration to conduct a system <lb/>and in particular a system of <add><unclear>this</unclear></add> confinement <add>and labour</add> for criminals — <lb/>in the way <add>on the principle</add> of <del>interested</del> <add>trust</add> management <del>as under the</del> <lb/>as under the original Penitentiary plan was no sufficient <lb/>authority for committing it to interested management as under <lb/>the proposed new Penitentiary plan: <del>and</del> <add>but</add> unless the <lb/>distance between interested management (as under the original <lb/>Transportation plan) and trust management (as under this <lb/>new Transportation plan) be greater than the distance between <lb/>trust management and interested management — it <lb/>should seem that, if the <sic>alledged</sic> <del>p</del> necessity or propriety, <lb/>of obtaining the <del>bit of t</del> <add>of resorting to Parliament for its express sanction</add> sanction of Parliament before <lb/>possession was taken of the land, was any thing better than a <lb/>pretence, that therefore <add>in that case</add> from and after the time at least <lb/>when the difference between the two species of management <lb/>was discovered — powers given by Parliament as under the <lb/>Old Transportation laws to provide for convicts by <add>under <add>on the <del>price</del></add></add> interested <lb/>management ought not, without express authority from <lb/>Parliament — use by <add>any such trick as</add> the intervention of a sham-contract, <lb/>to have been applied to the providing for the same description <lb/>of persons make <add>upon</add> the diametrically opposite system <add>plan</add> — under <lb/>mere trust management without interest. </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
28 June 1802 46 N. S. Wales 3
6. Conduct
3.Convict Let.
continued.
Be this as it may — [spite of the difficulty which
an u idea, in any degree divergent from the routine of common
place, experiences in its endeavours is doomed to experience to place itself in
the neighborhood of a declaiming tongue] so it is happens that
by one means or another, in the year 1794 if not before
the difference between interested management, and trust management
was not altogether a secret to Mr Pitt. Not
only so but at that time all th and (how long before I
can not pretend take upon me to say) it was sufficiently understood
that a law authorizing administration to conduct a system
and in particular a system of this confinement and labour for criminals —
in the way on the principle of interested trust management as under the
as under the original Penitentiary plan was no sufficient
authority for committing it to interested management as under
the proposed new Penitentiary plan: and but unless the
distance between interested management (as under the original
Transportation plan) and trust management (as under this
new Transportation plan) be greater than the distance between
trust management and interested management — it
should seem that, if the alledged p necessity or propriety,
of obtaining the bit of t of resorting to Parliament for its express sanction sanction of Parliament before
possession was taken of the land, was any thing better than a
pretence, that therefore in that case from and after the time at least
when the difference between the two species of management
was discovered — powers given by Parliament as under the
Old Transportation laws to provide for convicts by under <add>on the price</add> interested
management ought not, without express authority from
Parliament — use by any such trick as the intervention of a sham-contract,
to have been applied to the providing for the same description
of persons make upon the diametrically opposite system plan — under
mere trust management without interest.
Identifier: | JB/116/217/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-06-28 |
[[marginal_summary_numbering::[ ] continued]] |
||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
217 |
n. s. wales |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 / f46 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
1800 |
|||
37750 |
|||