JB/116/365/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/365/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>18 Jan<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> 1803 + <lb/>(7</head>
<head>18 Jan<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> 1803 + <lb/>(7</head>


<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 10. p. 316. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>October 1793. <add><hi rend='underline'>Intention executed a third time.&#x2014;</hi> </add>Sailed the Boddingtons <lb/>and Sugarcane for Bengal: "From the Sugarcane <lb/>"were brought up this day ... two "<del>more</del> Expirees: "they had<lb/> "got on board without permission. "... Punished with 90 <lb/>"lashes each, and sent up to Toongobbe." </p>     
<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 10. p. 316. 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>October 1793. <add><hi rend='underline'>Intention executed a third time.&#x2014;</hi> </add> Sailed the Boddington <lb/>and Sugarcane for Bengal: "From the Sugarcane <lb/>"were brought up this day ... two "<del>more</del> Expirees: "they had<lb/> "got on board without permission. "... Punished with 90 <lb/>"lashes each, and sent up to <sic>Toongabbe</sic>." <!-- Correct spelling is Toongabbie --> </p>      
 
<p><del>In M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Collins 2 Volumes <gap/></del> <add>In the continuation of the history, in express</add> statements of detention <lb/><del>no ideas have occurred to my research</del>. <add>have been met with <del>presented themselves</del>.</add> The historian not<lb/> being at this time not present in the Colony, the <del>statements</del> <lb/>provision exhibited in the former volume no longer for <lb/>scale intself in the same degree. During this latter period, [+]<lb/> <note>[+] the conception which it seems to be the object to present to view, is rather that of the removal of the restraint than the continuation of it. <del>Still however</del> It is not however the less <unclear>perceptible</unclear>, that even at this time it was <hi rend='underline'>retraint</hi> that constituted the <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> rub, and that whatever instances of the exercise of the <add>opposite</add> liberty took place, were the result of <del>spe</del> so many <hi rend='underline'>special</hi> permissions, and constituted but so many <hi rend='underline'>exceptions</hi> to the rule.</note> the <del>object seen impression that seems intended to be conveyed,<lb/> is that of the non-existence of <add>removal of all <gap/> <gap/></add> <gap/> bar on the liberty<lb/> of departure, in the case of Expirees. Grant this It appears <lb/>however notwithstanding, that the existence of this liberty<lb/> was by no means restraint was <gap/> the general <lb/>rule, and that liberty, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p><del>In M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Collins 2 Volumes <gap/></del> <add>In the continuation of the history, in express</add> statements of detention <lb/>
<del>no ideas have occurred to my research</del>. <add>have been met with <del>presented themselves</del>.</add>
The historian not<lb/> being at this time present in the Colony, the <del>statements</del> <lb/>precision exhibited in the former volume no longer presents <lb/>
itself in the same degree. During this latter period, [+]<lb/> <note>[+] the conception which it seems to be the object to present to view, is rather that of the removal of the restraint than the continuation of it. <del>Still however</del> It is not however the less perceptible, that even at this time it was <hi rend='underline'>restraint</hi> that constituted the <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> rub, and that whatever instances of the exercise of the <add>opposite</add> liberty took place, were the result of <del>spe</del> so many <hi rend='underline'>special</hi> permissions, and constituted but so many <hi rend='underline'>exceptions</hi> to the rule.</note>
<lb/>
the <del>object seen impression that seems intended to be conveyed,<lb/> is that of the non-existence of <add>removal of all <gap/> restraints</add> any bar on the liberty<lb/> of departure, in the case of Expirees. Grant this It appears <lb/>however notwithstanding, that the existence of this liberty<lb/> was by no means restraint was still the general <lb/>rule, and that liberty, <add>though frequently granted</add> took place not without special <lb/>permission, not any other-wise than as an exemption to the<lb/> general rule.</del> </p>


<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> <del>12</del> <add>11.</add> <del>p. 11 Collins</del> II p.11 6<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> December 1796. <add>"Although</add> they every<lb/> day saw that this obstacle was thrown in the way of the<lb/> "Convict <hi rend='underline'>who had got through the period of his transportation<lb/> "with credit and a good character</hi>, but that he was suffered <lb/>to depart with the marks of any ship who would receive<lb/> "him, and a certificate given to him of his being a free<lb/> man, <add>yet &amp;</add> By this it appears as plainly that <del>some</del><lb/> among Expirees themselves <del>some were detained as well as <lb/>others</del> <add>there were some, <del>that</del> to whom <del>principles</del> <add>the liberty</add> of departure was <del>gr</del> refused,<lb/> as it does</add> that there were others to whom it was granted. </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:23, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

18 Jany 1803 +
(7

No 10. p. 316. 2dOctober 1793. Intention executed a third time.— Sailed the Boddington
and Sugarcane for Bengal: "From the Sugarcane
"were brought up this day ... two "more Expirees: "they had
"got on board without permission. "... Punished with 90
"lashes each, and sent up to Toongabbe."

In Mr Collins 2 Volumes In the continuation of the history, in express statements of detention
no ideas have occurred to my research. have been met with presented themselves. The historian not
being at this time present in the Colony, the statements
precision exhibited in the former volume no longer presents
itself in the same degree. During this latter period, [+]
[+] the conception which it seems to be the object to present to view, is rather that of the removal of the restraint than the continuation of it. Still however It is not however the less perceptible, that even at this time it was restraint that constituted the general rub, and that whatever instances of the exercise of the opposite liberty took place, were the result of spe so many special permissions, and constituted but so many exceptions to the rule.
the object seen impression that seems intended to be conveyed,
is that of the non-existence of removal of all restraints any bar on the liberty
of departure, in the case of Expirees. Grant this It appears
however notwithstanding, that the existence of this liberty
was by no means restraint was still the general
rule, and that liberty, though frequently granted took place not without special
permission, not any other-wise than as an exemption to the
general rule.

No 12 11. p. 11 Collins II p.11 6th December 1796. "Although they every
day saw that this obstacle was thrown in the way of the
"Convict who had got through the period of his transportation
"with credit and a good character
, but that he was suffered
to depart with the marks of any ship who would receive
"him, and a certificate given to him of his being a free
man, yet & By this it appears as plainly that some
among Expirees themselves some were detained as well as
others
there were some, that to whom principles <add>the liberty of departure was gr refused,
as it does</add> that there were others to whom it was granted.




Identifier: | JB/116/365/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1803-01-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

365

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37898

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in