JB/116/642/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/642/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


61<lb/><lb/>two acts are there. Two Acts both of them to provide<lb/>for one gentleman, a gentleman already provided for<lb/>in a situation always <del>besigged</del> besieged by candidates.<lb/>an Act to increase his recompense, the other to<lb/>reduce his service.<lb/><lb/>But, Sir, what ground for all this? Is there<lb/>to be no end of all this malice &#x2014; of all these impu-<lb/>-tations &#x2014; these uncandid these envenomed insinuations?<lb/><lb/>My Lord, my answer is as distinct as possible.<lb/>Four features &#x2014;four antecedent features &#x2014;betray, even of<lb/>themselves the complexion of the business.<lb/><lb/>First the existence of such an abuse &#x2014;and for<lb/>such a length of time &#x2014;year after year &#x2014; under the<lb/>very <hi rend='underline'>noses</hi> &#x2014; (the term is a coarse one &#x2014; under the<lb/><hi rend='underline'>eyes</hi> I should have said, had gentlemen chosen to<lb/>have eyes &#x2014;) of such a pyramid of official personages<lb/>as those whose duty it was to prevent it.<lb/><lb/>Secondly, the neglect &#x2014;a neglect too indecorous<lb/>to have been manifested without cogent reasons &#x2014; the<lb/><sic>compleat</sic> neglect shown to the only persons by whom<lb/>the smallest wish to see it remedied had ever been<lb/>manifested.<lb/><lb/>Thirdly, the total absence of all signs of dis-<lb/>-pleasure &#x2014;as well rewards the persons by whose im-<lb/>-mediate misconduct the mischief had been brought<lb/>about, as towards the perpetually silent and mo-<lb/>-tionless official spectators, by whose connivance it<lb/>had been fostered: &#x2014;or the contrary &#x2014; <lb/><lb/>Fourthly, the positive tokens of satisfaction given,<lb/>by resorting to these very patrons & protectors of the abuse
<head>61</head>
 
<p>two acts are there. Two Acts both of them to provide<lb/>for one gentleman, a gentleman already provided for<lb/>in a situation always <del>besigged</del> besieged by candidates:<lb/>an Act to increase his recompense, the other to<lb/>reduce his service.</p>
 
<p>But, Sir, what ground for all this? Is there<lb/>to be no end of all this malice &#x2014; of all these imputations<lb/> &#x2014; these uncandid these envenomed insinuations?</p>
 
<p>My Lord, my answer is as distinct as possible.<lb/>Four features &#x2014; four antecedent features &#x2014; betray, even of<lb/>themselves the complexion of the business.</p>
 
<p>First the existence of such an abuse &#x2014; and for<lb/>such a length of time &#x2014; year after year &#x2014; under the<lb/>very <hi rend='underline'>noses</hi> &#x2014; (the term is a coarse one &#x2014; under the<lb/><hi rend='underline'>eyes</hi> I should have said, had gentlemen chosen to<lb/>have eyes &#x2014;) of such a pyramid of official personages<lb/>as those whose duty it was to prevent it.</p>
 
<p>Secondly, the neglect &#x2014; a neglect too indecorous<lb/>to have been manifested without cogent reasons &#x2014; the<lb/><sic>compleat</sic> neglect shown to the only persons by whom<lb/>the smallest wish to see it remedied had ever been<lb/>manifested.</p>
 
<p>Thirdly, the total absence of all signs of displeasure<lb/> &#x2014; as well rewards the persons by whose immediate<lb/> misconduct the mischief had been brought<lb/>about, as towards the perpetually silent and motionless<lb/> official spectators, by whose connivance it<lb/>had been fostered: &#x2014; or the contrary &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Fourthly, the positive tokens of satisfaction given,<lb/>by resorting to these very patrons & protectors of the abuse</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:23, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

61

two acts are there. Two Acts both of them to provide
for one gentleman, a gentleman already provided for
in a situation always besigged besieged by candidates:
an Act to increase his recompense, the other to
reduce his service.

But, Sir, what ground for all this? Is there
to be no end of all this malice — of all these imputations
— these uncandid these envenomed insinuations?

My Lord, my answer is as distinct as possible.
Four features — four antecedent features — betray, even of
themselves the complexion of the business.

First the existence of such an abuse — and for
such a length of time — year after year — under the
very noses — (the term is a coarse one — under the
eyes I should have said, had gentlemen chosen to
have eyes —) of such a pyramid of official personages
as those whose duty it was to prevent it.

Secondly, the neglect — a neglect too indecorous
to have been manifested without cogent reasons — the
compleat neglect shown to the only persons by whom
the smallest wish to see it remedied had ever been
manifested.

Thirdly, the total absence of all signs of displeasure
— as well rewards the persons by whose immediate
misconduct the mischief had been brought
about, as towards the perpetually silent and motionless
official spectators, by whose connivance it
had been fostered: — or the contrary —

Fourthly, the positive tokens of satisfaction given,
by resorting to these very patrons & protectors of the abuse




Identifier: | JB/116/642/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

642

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d61 / d62

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7, and note 4 to letter 1824, vol. 7

ID Number

38175

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in