★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>of the 12 Judges, a decision given in this very instance, <lb/> in the instance of this very spot, when first fixed upon<lb/> for as many Penitentiary Houses: One in Wandsworth<lb/> Common Field for Females: this at Battersea Rise for<lb/> Males. People in Wandsworth were alarmed: people<lb/> in Battersea were alarmedL the Judges disallowed the<lb/> choice of Wandsworth Field, not because they considered <lb/> the alarms of neighbourhoods as sufficient grounds for<lb/> negativing such a choice, (for if they had they must<lb/> have rejected this spot as well as the other,) but because<lb/> they regarded this <hi rend="underline">one</hi> spot as sufficient as well as proper<lb/> for both establishments.</p> | |||
<p>As to this point, you Memorialist can not take upon <lb/> him, nor is it necessary, to say precisely of what description<lb/>the individuals were whose investments were meant to<lb/> be included in the above mentioned calculation of £200,000:<lb/> whether it included the whole number of individuals, at<lb/> whatsoever periods their respective investments had been<lb/> made, who conceived themselves aggrieved: or whether it<lb/> included, such only, whose investments had been made, at<lb/> periods subsequent to that, at which the taking possession <lb/> of the land for the purpose in question, became known<lb/> to have been suspended. Whichsoever of these suppositions<lb/> be the true one, it makes, with respect to the justice<lb/> of such claims, as your Memorialist humbly apprehends,<lb/> no sort of difference. So far as any such investment<lb/> took place previously to the aforesaid decision<lb/><add>of</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
of the 12 Judges, a decision given in this very instance,
in the instance of this very spot, when first fixed upon
for as many Penitentiary Houses: One in Wandsworth
Common Field for Females: this at Battersea Rise for
Males. People in Wandsworth were alarmed: people
in Battersea were alarmedL the Judges disallowed the
choice of Wandsworth Field, not because they considered
the alarms of neighbourhoods as sufficient grounds for
negativing such a choice, (for if they had they must
have rejected this spot as well as the other,) but because
they regarded this one spot as sufficient as well as proper
for both establishments.
As to this point, you Memorialist can not take upon
him, nor is it necessary, to say precisely of what description
the individuals were whose investments were meant to
be included in the above mentioned calculation of £200,000:
whether it included the whole number of individuals, at
whatsoever periods their respective investments had been
made, who conceived themselves aggrieved: or whether it
included, such only, whose investments had been made, at
periods subsequent to that, at which the taking possession
of the land for the purpose in question, became known
to have been suspended. Whichsoever of these suppositions
be the true one, it makes, with respect to the justice
of such claims, as your Memorialist humbly apprehends,
no sort of difference. So far as any such investment
took place previously to the aforesaid decision
of
|
Identifier: | JB/118/117/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
26 |
|||
|
118 |
panopticon |
||
|
117 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d17 / d18 / d19 / d20 |
||
|
see note to letter 988, vol. 5 |
39171 |
||
