JB/120/157/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/120/157/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
</head>
</head>
<p><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <note>Rose</note></p>
<p><del><gap/> <gap/></del> <note>Rose</note></p>
<p>The above <del>account</del> <add><sic>incompleat</sic> sketch<add><del>narration</del><add><del>relation</del></add></add></add> which, though (I believe) not<lb/>
<p>The above <del>account</del> <add><sic>incompleat</sic> sketch<add><del>narration</del><add><del>relation</del></add> which, though (I believe) not<lb/>
sent, was <del>designs</del> written in the intention of  being<lb/>
sent, was <del>designs</del> written in the intention of  being<lb/>
sent - and written at the time when the impression<lb/>
sent - and written at the time when the impression<lb/>
Line 45: Line 45:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:29, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

30 Jany 1802 +After B9 Conn.Obs. 1952

SS34 Prior intrigues - Tergiversation of Mr Rose 5

Rose

The above account incompleat sketch<add>narration<add>relation which, though (I believe) not
sent, was designs written in the intention of being
sent - and written at the time when the impression
made by every accid incident was fresh in the memory
- may serve (as already intimated) as far
as it goes. But, being writte addressed to a person,
whose time would not admit of long details, it
was a very abbreviated one, and several particulars
of a naturesort not much in danger of stepping
evaporating quickly being obliteratedevaporating out of the memory, may
be here subjoined.


Upon Mr Rose'sthe Honourable Secretary's setting pen to paper as
above, I soon found that the but too much
reason to be satisfiedassured that the mistatement was
wilful, and probably pre- concistedpre-arranged. not an idea
of itof what he wrote bore the smallest resemblance to whathe had dictated
made me dictate. - Articles, four or five in number - each. Articles 4 or 5, each vying with the other
rest in absurdity: the one that the one above reported ismay serve as a specimen,
but it is but one. The experienced cloudiness of
the Honourable Secretary's conceptions might have
accounted for a good deal: but no degree of
honed misconception could have accounted for
half the absurdity, which , under my very eye, he
had the assurance to put into my mouth.
I wasbecame seriousy and prophetically apprehensive, of some gross and
blazingfalshood, we to be brought up against me upon occasion,
such as that which your Lordship will see
in an an a false, malicious as well as anonymous libel paper from





Identifier: | JB/120/157/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.

Date_1

1802-01-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

120

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

157

Info in main headings field

prior intrigues - tergiversation of mr rose

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e15 / f15 / f52

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39983

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in