★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/011/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/121/011/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Marginal Corrections</head> | |||
<head>Marginal Corrections < | <head>Correct<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Oberv<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>{Compensation} <lb/>{Suppression}</head> | ||
Spence's opposition <lb/> J.B. has <lb/> the proof in his <lb/> | <p>Suppression. </p> <p> 1.<lb/>The difference between <lb/> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fide</foreign></hi> suppression <lb/> of documents and <lb/> Forgery lies not in <lb/> the mischief but <lb/> in the article of <lb/>punishment and <lb/> that of faculty of <lb/> proof. </p> <p> 2. <lb/> In the instance of <lb/> J.B.<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> supplemental <lb/> Letter of 20<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> June <lb/> 1800 & Boards Letter of <lb/> reference between that <lb/> and the 27<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> it would <lb/> be a point to pronounce <lb/> upon whether the <lb/> suppression was <lb/> <foreign><hi rend="underline">bona</hi></foreign> or <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fide.</foreign></hi> </p> <p> 3. <lb/> Proof of <hi rend="underline"><foreign>mala fidis</foreign></hi> <lb/>in ther suppression <lb/> of J B<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> supplemental <lb/> letter of 20 June 1800 <lb/> (if <del> suppd</del> suppressed) <lb/> its putting a flat <lb/>contradiction on the <lb/> pretended increase <lb/> of terms. </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Can put to <sic>shew</sic> <lb/> the points of agreement <lb/> & disagreement <lb/> between <foreign>mala fide</foreign> <lb/> suppression & forgery. <lb/> 1. Obliterative forgery - <lb/> If instead of suppressing <lb/>the entire letter <lb/> (20 June 1800) supplemental <lb/> to the Memorial <lb/> Long had obliterated <lb/> the saving Clause to <lb/> a like effect in the <lb/>body of the Memorial <lb/>the effect would <lb/> have been the same. </p> <p> 5<lb/> 2 So also by creative <lb/> Forgery the same <lb/> effect might have <lb/> been produced. </p> <pb/><!-- note in different ink --><note>Think of the materials<lb/> that mans<lb/> heart must be<lb/> made of who being<lb/> <unclear>omnipresent</unclear><lb/> when having events<lb/> at his command<lb/> - and having the<lb/> choice of means -<lb/> chooses in preference<lb/> a course of<lb/> eight years perfidy</note> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | <pb/> <p> Perfidy </p> <p> 1. <lb/> The ignominy of <lb/> perfidy is not incurred <lb/> wantonly <lb/> nor without a <lb/> specific motive by <lb/> any body - nor in <lb/> particular was on <lb/> the particular <lb/> occasion in question <lb/> by <del>Pitt</del> Pitt.</p> <p> 2.<lb/> He had a particular <lb/> & cogent reason <lb/> for it - the fear <lb/> of putting hs <lb/> habitual messmate <lb/> L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Spencer out of <lb/> humour. - </p> <p>3. <lb/> Of L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> | ||
Spence's opposition <lb/> J.B. has <lb/> the proof in his <lb/> Lordship's hand. </p> <p> 4. <lb/> Had it not been <lb/> for that cogent <lb/> reason JB <sic>admitts</sic> <lb/> that Pitt would have <lb/> carried the Establishment <lb/> into effect. </p> <p>5<lb/> Pitt would no <lb/> more have broken <lb/> his word than <lb/> he would have<lb/> concurred in the <lb/> exercise of legislative <lb/> power if the object <lb/> of the conspiracy <lb/> could have been <lb/> effected otherwise. </p> <pb/> <p> Perfidy. </p> <p> 6 <lb/> If a man were <lb/> uniform in the <lb/> breach of his promises <lb/> it would <lb/> come to the same <lb/> thing as if he <lb/> were so in the <lb/> observance of them. </p> <p>7. <lb/> The influence is - <lb/> not that Pitt breaks <lb/> promises so often <lb/> as he keeps them - <lb/> he break<del>s</del> them <lb/> no oftener than it <lb/> answers the convenience<lb/> or fancied <lb/> interest of the <lb/>moment. - </p> <p> 8. <lb/> Had the uneasiness <lb/> from the shame <lb/> of having broke <lb/> his promise ever <lb/> surmounted that <lb/> which caused his <lb/> breaking it - he <lb/> would have <lb/>repented & kept it - <lb/> this was JB<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> <lb/> chance. </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | |||
'Click Here To Edit
Marginal Corrections
Correctd Obervd{Compensation}
{Suppression}
Suppression.
1.
The difference between
mala fide suppression
of documents and
Forgery lies not in
the mischief but
in the article of
punishment and
that of faculty of
proof.
2.
In the instance of
J.B.s supplemental
Letter of 20th June
1800 & Boards Letter of
reference between that
and the 27th it would
be a point to pronounce
upon whether the
suppression was
bona or mala fide.
3.
Proof of mala fidis
in ther suppression
of J Bs supplemental
letter of 20 June 1800
(if suppd suppressed)
its putting a flat
contradiction on the
pretended increase
of terms.
4.
Can put to shew
the points of agreement
& disagreement
between mala fide
suppression & forgery.
1. Obliterative forgery -
If instead of suppressing
the entire letter
(20 June 1800) supplemental
to the Memorial
Long had obliterated
the saving Clause to
a like effect in the
body of the Memorial
the effect would
have been the same.
5
2 So also by creative
Forgery the same
effect might have
been produced.
---page break---
Think of the materials
that mans
heart must be
made of who being
omnipresent
when having events
at his command
- and having the
choice of means -
chooses in preference
a course of
eight years perfidy
---page break---
Perfidy
1.
The ignominy of
perfidy is not incurred
wantonly
nor without a
specific motive by
any body - nor in
particular was on
the particular
occasion in question
by Pitt Pitt.
2.
He had a particular
& cogent reason
for it - the fear
of putting hs
habitual messmate
Ld Spencer out of
humour. -
3.
Of Ld
Spence's opposition
J.B. has
the proof in his
Lordship's hand.
4.
Had it not been
for that cogent
reason JB admitts
that Pitt would have
carried the Establishment
into effect.
5
Pitt would no
more have broken
his word than
he would have
concurred in the
exercise of legislative
power if the object
of the conspiracy
could have been
effected otherwise.
---page break---
Perfidy.
6
If a man were
uniform in the
breach of his promises
it would
come to the same
thing as if he
were so in the
observance of them.
7.
The influence is -
not that Pitt breaks
promises so often
as he keeps them -
he breaks them
no oftener than it
answers the convenience
or fancied
interest of the
moment. -
8.
Had the uneasiness
from the shame
of having broke
his promise ever
surmounted that
which caused his
breaking it - he
would have
repented & kept it -
this was JBs
chance.
|
Identifier: | JB/121/011/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-13, 15, 1-8 |
|||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
011 |
Marginal Contents Compensation Suppression Perfidy Connectg Observs |
||
|
003 |
Offer of compensation / Suppression / Perfidy |
||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
A8 / F8 |
||
|
CW 1799 |
|||
|
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
003 |
|||
