★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<add>the legislators</add> and that he runs his head against <lb/>an Act of Parliament for the mere pleasure of beating <lb/>it down, as a bull would at a red waistcoat? <lb/>Is this credible of any man — not to speak of the Duke <lb/>of Portland?</p> | <add>the legislators</add> and that he runs his head against <lb/>an Act of Parliament for the mere pleasure of beating <lb/>it down, as a bull would at a red waistcoat? <lb/>Is this credible of any man — not to speak of the Duke <lb/>of Portland?</p> | ||
<p><del>Em</del> Enmity, my Lord? — most certainly not. — Enmity is not </p> | |||
<p><del>My Lord I impute to him no such <lb/>enmity. I impute nothing <add>now</add> to him but contempt. <lb/> enmity: contempt is the only sentiment I charge him with, <lb/>as towards the authority of Parliament. Contempt not enmity is the <add>what</add> </del> sentiment a man <lb/>feels for that <add>a</add> power, which he beholds lying under <add>at</add> <lb/>his feet. What I do not say is — that it <lb/><del><gap/> is a practice with him upon all occasions <add>he makes it a study <add>a point</add></add></del> on this or any other occasion, & <lb/> <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> and which every <lb/>Secretary of State <lb/>will feel for the authority <lb/>of Parliament, <lb/>if the Duke of Portland <lb/>is not punished.</note><del>running</del> the Duke of Portland has made <del>a study of running</del> <lb/>it a matter of sport or study to run at Acts of <lb/><add><del>to go out of his way to run against acts of</del></add> <lb/>Parliament, for the mere pleasure of beating them <lb/>down: what I do say is — that when he has a <lb/> <add><del>a</del> particular</add> point to gain — <del>[<add>such as</add> a job for a M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baldwin <lb/>or a compliment for a Lord Belgrave</del> —] and <lb/><add>at the same time</add> <hi rend="underline">a licence for being bold</hi> — he <del>he does not care</del> <add><hi rend="underline">cares</hi> not</add> how <lb/>many acts he <del>beats down</del> <add><unclear>moves</unclear> against</add> in the pursuit of <del>his</del> <add>it,</add> <lb/><del>point: <add>object</add> — and Your Lordship has seen the proofs <lb/>of it. </del> — and the proofs <del>of it</del> are, I hope <add><del>I think</del></add> plain <lb/>enough. What I do not impute to him, is <lb/><note>not the contempt of <lb/>hostility — but the contempt <lb/> of negligence</note> a causeless and impossible enmity towards Parliament: <lb/>what do <del>I</del> impute to him, is — a but too natural — <lb/> <add>(and thinking of the results</add> I had almost said <add>but</add> too well warranted) — contempt for <lb/>Parliament: — <del>and</del> <add>a contempt manifested by</add> that <hi rend="underline">carelessness</hi> which is the natural effect and sign of it.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
20 Apr. 1802 36 Dispensing power
What then (says Your Lordship) would you have
me suppose that the Duke is at heart in a state enmity
The
Contempt not
enmity was the
sentiment Italics thus
expressed ?
Parliament with Parliament,
the legislators and that he runs his head against
an Act of Parliament for the mere pleasure of beating
it down, as a bull would at a red waistcoat?
Is this credible of any man — not to speak of the Duke
of Portland?
Em Enmity, my Lord? — most certainly not. — Enmity is not
My Lord I impute to him no such
enmity. I impute nothing now to him but contempt.
enmity: contempt is the only sentiment I charge him with,
as towards the authority of Parliament. Contempt not enmity is the what sentiment a man
feels for that a power, which he beholds lying under at
his feet. What I do not say is — that it
is a practice with him upon all occasions he makes it a study <add>a point</add> on this or any other occasion, &
[+] and which every
Secretary of State
will feel for the authority
of Parliament,
if the Duke of Portland
is not punished.running the Duke of Portland has made a study of running
it a matter of sport or study to run at Acts of
to go out of his way to run against acts of
Parliament, for the mere pleasure of beating them
down: what I do say is — that when he has a
a particular point to gain — [such as a job for a Mr Baldwin
or a compliment for a Lord Belgrave —] and
at the same time a licence for being bold — he he does not care cares not how
many acts he beats down moves against in the pursuit of his it,
point: object — and Your Lordship has seen the proofs
of it. — and the proofs of it are, I hope I think plain
enough. What I do not impute to him, is
not the contempt of
hostility — but the contempt
of negligence a causeless and impossible enmity towards Parliament:
what do I impute to him, is — a but too natural —
(and thinking of the results I had almost said but too well warranted) — contempt for
Parliament: — and a contempt manifested by that carelessness which is the natural effect and sign of it.
Identifier: | JB/121/400/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-04-20 |
Not numbered |
||
121 |
Panopticon |
||
400 |
Dispensing power |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
F36 |
||
CW 1799 |
|||
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
1799 |
|||
001 |
|||